Примеры использования Definition may на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The view was expressed that the definition may be too broad.
A too narrow definition may not leave the necessary flexibility for deciding on requests.
Those who are only looking for a summary or general definition may stop reading at the end of the lead.
This definition may differ from definitions used by governmental regulatory agencies or other organizations.
In the case of mercury, the issue of disposal as part of the waste definition may be problematic in the light of the limited disposal options available.
Your definition may be complex or very simple when illustrated with some natural images, like a dolphin playing with them.
Although WHO has a global case definition for surveillance purposes,the actual case definition may vary between and within countries and regions.
It is suggested that perhaps this definition may be used here and that the reference to“similar operations” is unnecessary.
By using the plural"States",subparagraph(a) does not imply that an international organization within the definition may be established only by a plurality of States.
This definition may include Department of Defense personnel acting in a law enforcement capacity.
The United Nations system has not developed a strict definition of“indigenous peoples”, as such a definition may not be workable in all contexts and may be over-inclusive or under-inclusive.
Your definition may differ, but I define a lapsed donor as someone who has not donated to your organization within the last year, two years or three years.
While the United Kingdom welcomes the flexible approach adopted by the Commission,we remain concerned that the definition may not capture all the circumstances in which a reservation may be"specified.
In the same way that as business definition may be implemented in more than one technology, it is also capable of more than one presentation format.
In the light of the significant number of non-nationals and stateless persons residing on the territory of the State party,it believes that such a restrictive and narrow definition may limit the scope of the State Programme on Integration.
The definition may draw on, as appropriate, the existing international conventions and related provisions of Security Council resolutions.
Formally, the court refers to another legal basis, statutory definition may be very similar if not fully equal and could apply to detention on the grounds of the danger of escape.
This definition may be needed to ensure clarity of the coverage of the provisions concerning liability of commercial carriers in the Model Law.
In the light of the significant number of non-nationals and stateless persons residing on the territory of the State party,it believes that such a restrictive and narrow definition may limit the scope of the State Programme on Integration" CERD/C/304/Add.98, para. 9.
The independent expert considers that this definition may evolve as the understanding of the human rights obligations related to sanitation continues to develop.
Mr. BANTON proposed that the second sentence should be restructured to read:"In the light of the significant number of non-nationals and stateless persons residing on the territory of the State party,it believes that such a restrictive and narrow definition may restrict the scope of the State Programme on Integration.
It is important to stress that this definition may require refinement in the near future, based on country experiences with implementing this Guide into practice.
This definition may include residents of a foreign country that maintains a state of hostilities against the State of Israel, who belong to a terrorist organization that operates against the security of the state and who satisfy the other conditions of the statutory definition of‘unlawful combatant.' This definition may also include inhabitants of the Gaza Strip which today is no longer held under belligerent occupation.
There was also agreement that it was impractical to make a distinction between natural andman-made disasters, and that the definition may encompass material and environmental loss, to the extent that such loss affects persons, and that it should require some actual harm, even though some members emphasized that imminent harm should be considered sufficient.
This definition may apply to anyone who, being aware of the group's criminal objectives, becomes involved in activities that contribute to the achievement of such objectives.
There are cases(elaborated in this paper)where the definition may, figuratively speaking, tread on some countries' toes, as was mentioned at the twenty-third session of the Group of Experts.
However, the definition may still cover these groups where, for example, a terrorist organization sells drugs in order to raise money to fund their operations.
The reason the WTO Appellate Body has occasionally formulated a more demanding definition may be due to the specific character and the working of the WTO agreements rather than to a considered view of the requirements of article 31(3)(b) for a broad range of other treaties.
Date of completion under this definition may differ from that established for IFRS revenue accounting purposes, as well as from the date of actual opening to traffic.
Many of the instruments which would be included within the definition may, depending on their content, be considered either internal or international in character, with very different implications for the international responsibility of the organization.