Примеры использования Delegation could not accept на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
This the state delegation could not accept.
His delegation could not accept the deletion of article 7 or the elimination of the no-harm rule.
I regret that one delegation could not accept this.
Her delegation could not accept a failure to submit the reports to the Committee by the end of the year.
In the circumstances, his delegation could not accept the report of ACABQ.
His delegation could not accept the justification offered for those acts, which were violations of the fourth Geneva Convention.
Mr. Goicochea Estenoz(Cuba)said that her delegation could not accept that proposal.
Her delegation could not accept any impact on programme resources.
Repeating past allegations served only to introduce falsehoods into the draft resolution, which her delegation could not accept.
What her delegation could not accept was the implication that the seminars were a redundant anachronism.
Mr. GELBER(United States of America) said that,for reasons well known to the Committee, his delegation could not accept the draft decision.
Ms. Janson(Canada) said that her delegation could not accept the amendment referring to the issue of foreign occupation.
His delegation could not accept the setting of new priorities without the agreement of Member States; that would set a dangerous precedent.
It should not be associated with any particular religion or culture, and his delegation could not accept that a people's struggle against occupation should be equated with terrorism.
His delegation could not accept non-payment by other Member States or a change in its effective share in the current scale of assessments.
The representative of another group reiterated that the introduction of wording on market access was new text which her delegation could not accept and that it was in a context that differed from its original inclusion in the discussions of agenda item 6.
Her delegation could not accept that international organizations could be in a position to exercise the right to self-defence.
Mr. HANSON(Canada) said that his delegation could not accept the imposition of a ceiling on assessments for peacekeeping operations.
His delegation could not accept, and was alarmed by, the Secretary-General's recommendation to increase the level of the contingency fund.
Mr. Hu Xiaodi(China)said that his delegation could not accept certain parts of the paper but could agree to use it as a framework.
His delegation could not accept a proprio motu power for the Prosecutor, because it considered that the Court could act only on referral from a State party.
Mr. RAO(India) said that his delegation could not accept the use of the word"sustainable" in the fifth preambular paragraph or in articles 5, 6 and 7.
Moreover, her delegation could not accept the phrase"taking into account the provisions of articles 5 and 6" which had been added to article 7, paragraph 2.
For that reason, his delegation could not accept the proposal just made by the representative of Singapore, which would preclude the application of paragraph 2.
Lastly, his delegation could not accept research that violated human dignity, especially when the same experiments could be carried out with adult stem cells.
Consequently, his delegation could not accept the Group's recommendations as a package and would engage constructively in the deliberations in order to achieve the best outcome for the Organization.
Her delegation could not accept that treaty monitoring bodies were competent to rule on the validity of reservations in the absence of an express treaty provision to that effect.
Incidentally, his delegation could not accept the latter article in its current form since it constituted an attempt to establish additional procedural hurdles at the start of investigations.
Furthermore, her delegation could not accept any resolution that might prejudge the Secretary-General's forthcoming comprehensive assessment of the United Nations system's response.
Ms. LI Ting(China)said that her delegation could not accept the provisions allowing the Prosecutor to initiate action ex officio; article 6(first version), paragraph 1(c), should be deleted.