Примеры использования Delegation did not agree на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
One delegation did not agree.
Mr. Shigabutdinov(Uzbekistan) said that the draft resolution was based on a previous draft resolution containing provisions with which his delegation did not agree.
My delegation did not agree to the proposal for the following reasons.
Mr. Ibrahima Khalil Diallo(Senegal)said that his delegation did not agree with the views just expressed by the delegation of France.
Her delegation did not agree, moreover, that discussing the issue would lead to paralysis.
Ms. LI Yanduan(China)said that her delegation did not agree that the Prosecutor should be given powers of investigation ex officio.
Her delegation did not agree that guaranteed tenure for military judges necessarily led to a better outcome.
Ms. FEDER(Uruguay), referring to article 105, said that her delegation did not agree with the proposal to allow voluntary contributions to be used to finance the Court's activities.
His delegation did not agree with the line of reasoning that the Tribunal was merely a jurisdictional mechanism to be funded from the regular budget, and it found comparisons with the International Court of Justice inappropriate.
Mr. Morán Bovio(Spain)said that his delegation did not agree with the previous speakers: the four topics covered in the note were completely distinct from one another.
One delegation did not agree with the view of the Office that it was not normally its role to address the Committee outside of the consideration of programme 6, Legal affairs, and stressed that the overall purpose of the Office was to provide advice to the principal and subsidiary organs of the United Nations.
Mr. KEATING(New Zealand)said that his delegation did not agree with those who had suggested that United Nations peace-keeping activities were becoming less important.
His delegation did not agree with the view that the circumstances caused by the current financial crisis might somehow fuel positive change in the Organization.
Mr. Bayat Mokhtari(Islamic Republic of Iran) said that his delegation did not agree with the Secretary-General's view that long-term workforce planning was of little value to the Organization.
Another delegation did not agree on the equivalency drawn between the intergovernmental organization and the Government.
With reference to question 11 of the list of issues, the delegation did not agree with the Committee's contention that there was a high incidence of ill-treatment by police officers of detainees and suspects.
The delegation did not agree with the definition of systematic torture given in the report of the Special Rapporteur on torture.
The Secretary-General had acted within his authority and his delegation did not agree with any suggestion- if in fact such a suggestion had been made- that the authority of Member States had somehow been infringed upon.
His delegation did not agree with the idea of requiring States to accept fact-finding missions within their territory.
For example, his delegation did not agree that the scale of assessments was a non-urgent issue.
His delegation did not agree that the current cash flow problems were linked to any unfairness in the scale of assessments.
Mr. DIAZ PANIAGUA(Costa Rica)said that his delegation did not agree with the representative of India that enforced disappearance of persons should be dropped from the list of crimes against humanity.
His delegation did not agree with the possible interpretations of that paragraph set out by the Special Rapporteur in paragraph 92 of the report.
The representative of Cuba stated that his delegation did not agree to additional time for the working group which should remain within the time normally allocated to other important working groups which perform similar tasks.
Her delegation did not agree that ratification by the States directly concerned should be a prerequisite for the exercise of jurisdiction.
However, there was one point on which his delegation did not agree with the Mexican delegation, namely the establishment of a working relationship between the Disarmament Commission and the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space.
His delegation did not agree that the articles in that chapter would rarely be applied in practice, but in fact held a diametrically opposite view.
However, her delegation did not agree that there was no predetermined hierarchy of sources of such practice.
Accordingly, his delegation did not agree to the inclusion, in the case of interpretative declarations, of the criterion of"enlargement", which was, however, necessary in the case of reservations.
My delegation does not agree with the implications of the second and third preambular paragraphs.