Примеры использования Disarmament measure на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
We did not see it as a disarmament measure.
In our view, any nuclear disarmament measure should be based on an appropriate blend of idealism and realism.
A nonverifiable and mere cutoff treaty will not be a disarmament measure.
Another important collateral disarmament measure relates to nuclear-weapon-free zones.
It is also worth noting that like those treaties, the proposed FMCT,would not be a"real" disarmament measure.
Люди также переводят
If it is to become a genuine nuclear disarmament measure, it should include verification and stocks.
The United Nations Register of Conventional Arms is a confidence-building measure, not a disarmament measure.
Another disarmament measure Canada supports is an early entry into force of the Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty.
Queries were raised as to how it was decided whether a disarmament measure was practical or not.
Although the Register is not a disarmament measure, it has proven to be a highly successful confidence-building instrument for the international community.
It would be a step towards nuclear disarmament butwould not in itself be a disarmament measure.
However, in order to be credible,any bilateral or unilateral disarmament measure should adopt the principles of transparency, irreversibility and verifiability.
The geopolitical characteristics of specific regions should be taken into account in assessing the consequences of any given disarmament measure.
Negotiations on a fissile material cut-off treaty are to be a disarmament measure and not only a non-proliferation measure; .
A fissile material cut-off treaty(FMCT) is the most realistic logical step for the next multilateral legal disarmament measure.
Convinced that any treaty on fissile material must constitute a disarmament measure and not only a non-proliferation measure”;
We also view the CTBT as a disarmament measure which must put an end to the qualitative and quantitative proliferation of nuclear weapons, whether vertically or horizontally.
But I would like to stress that the FMCT is the most realistic multilateral legal disarmament measure envisaged at this moment.
Any nuclear disarmament measure should follow the guidelines of maintaining global strategic balance and stability and undiminished security for all.
In this regard,we reiterate that nuclear-weapon-free zones are not an end in themselves or a disarmament measure per se.
In this context, in order for us to take a positive position vis-à-vis any disarmament measure, three fundamental criteria have to be satisfied from a regional perspective.
However, preparedness to discuss only“possibilities” and“cuts”, coupled with delays in ratifications,does not augur well for the START process as a disarmament measure.
No disarmament measure will be able to garner universal support or have lasting viability if it is taken at the expense of the economic or scientific development of most countries.
It seems to us that a treaty that did not cover them but was merely a cut-off treaty would be justan arms control measure, not a disarmament measure.
Each disarmament measure included in the programme would be negotiated through a mechanism- bilateral, regional, multilateral or global- that is the most appropriate for that specific measure. .
The adoption of the Treaty of Pelindaba creating a nuclear-weapon-free zone in Africa has been an important contribution to confidence building in Africa,in addition to being a collateral disarmament measure.
In our view, each disarmament measure included in the programme would be negotiated through a mechanism- bilateral, regional, multilateral or global- which is the most appropriate for that specific measure. .
This brings me to another urgent issue which is high on the international agenda both as a humanitarian concern and as a disarmament measure- a ban on anti-personnel landmines APLs.
The approach of reducing surplusesof nuclear weapons and materials little by little and selling them as a disarmament measure is not a response and is not sufficient to eliminate this danger, taking into account its seriousness and magnitude.
But if we are only going to negotiate an agreement that bans future production and does nothing to the existing thousands of nuclear warheads that are in the possession of some of our friends around this room,then it is not a disarmament measure.