Примеры использования Equivalence scale на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Equivalence scales;
Choice of equivalence scale.
Equivalence scales.
Income per Consumer Unit that is, after applying an equivalence scale.
Equivalence scale: 1 adult 1.0.
Relative poverty rates in Poland calculated with different equivalence scales.
Swedish equivalence scale 1996.
Income measurements: in close coordination with the Canberra Group; equivalence scales; public social expenditures.
Equivalence scales for international use CES/AC.70/7.
Every household member gets assigned an equivalence scale based upon their age.
Details of Equivalence Scales should be made available as meta-data.
The corresponding proportion as measured on the EU equivalence scale was 7.3%, approximately 70,000 children.
This scale(also called"Oxford scale") was mentioned by OECD(1982)for possible use in"countries which have not established their own equivalence scale.
For this purpose we used the equivalence scale recommended by the NTA project United Nations, 2013, p. 100.
In addition to income per household, the use of income per household member andincome per Consumer Unit(calculated using equivalence scales) is recommended.
However, it appears that whatever equivalence scales are adopted, arbitrary judgements are inevitable.
During the three-year period 2005- 2007, 4.7% of all children under 18,(approximately 45,000 children),lived in households with a persistently low income measured on the OECD equivalence scale.
Since in the United States absolute poverty line is measured by using an equivalence scale which is rarely used in developing countries, M.
Applying the modified OECD equivalence scale increased the at-risk-of-poverty rate for this group of persons to 12%; in the case of the square root scale, it reached almost 16.
The account covers all sources of household income and deductions, leading to Net Disposable Income, which may be expressed per household,per household member and(by using an equivalence scale) per consumer unit.
Although there is no standard equivalence scale, the modified OECD equivalence scale has wide acceptance in many countries.
In the three-year period 2006- 2008, 3.2% of the population(almost 141,000 persons) had a persistently low income,defined by an average income over a three-year period that was below 50% of the median income according to the OECD equivalence scale.
In this case the Oxford Modified Equivalence Scale is used, because it was the most commonly used and therefore preferred scale in the EGDNA.
For a single-member household, Rmi amounts to the difference between an established threshold(Euro268 in 2000) andthe monthly disposable income of the beneficiary, while for different household sizes the amount of the benefit is calculated with reference to ISE equivalence scale.
The magnitude of absolute poverty depends directly on the equivalence scale chosen(or equivalency ratio E) and can, all else equal, differ at times.
It was recalled that equivalence scales are designed to ensure a meaningful measurement of household welfare by adjusting household incomes with respect to differences in size and composition of the household.
Another set of value judgements is involved when equivalence scales are used to apply poverty lines to families of different sizes and compositions.
The OECD equivalence scale was adopted(proposed for the statistical measurement of poverty at the level of the European Union), which made it possible to diversify the income criteria depending on the number of household members and the ages of the children.
The sensitivity of the poverty measure to the choice of the equivalence scales and the influence of non-response on the poverty measure were also pointed out.
Eurostat recommends that, where equivalence scales are used in the estimation of incomes of agricultural households, that the scales currently in use within national household budget surveys are employed.