Примеры использования Expert group recognized на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The expert group recognized gaps in knowledge with regard to N dynamics.
Possible best practices as regards design: The expert group recognized that certain low-pressure anti-vehicle mines could be activated by a person.
The expert group recognized that the value of statistics lay in their analysis and dissemination.
The Prosecutor is gratified that the Expert Group recognized the unique situation with regard to interns in the Office of the Prosecutor and welcomes their endorsement of considering an exception to the six-month period-of-service rule.
The Expert Group recognized that further information was unlikely to be available in the time frame of its work;
Many of the judges interviewed by the Expert Group recognized that to a greater or lesser degree this feature complicated the work of the Tribunals For example, lawyers trained in the civil law are apt to be unfamiliar with common law principles and procedures, and vice versa.
The Expert Group recognized the usefulness of such tables and requested the secretariat to include them in Chapter 4.2.3.1.
The Expert Group recognized that there had been several creative and notable initiatives undertaken by migrant women workers themselves.
The Expert Group recognized the importance of including information about the composition of ambient PM in the outputs to the model;
The Expert Group recognized the difficulty of distinguishing between the effects of PM10, PM2.5, primary PM and secondary organic aerosols.
The Expert Group recognized that, in addition to these dossiers, Parties might propose the drawing-up of dossiers on other substances.
The Expert Group recognized the inextricable links between the criminal activities under consideration and organized crime and corruption.
The Joint Expert Group recognized the need for developing empirical relationships between observed climate change variables and observed effects.
The Expert Group recognized that some future difficulties may arise in view of the adoption of important EU regulations currently under discussion.
Conclusion: The Expert Group recognized the importance of country classifications based on codes that defined individual countries as well as groupings of countries.
The Expert Group recognized that including eTIR in such a UB would not only leverage the development of the eTIR project as such but also the activities of GE.1 as a whole.
Nonetheless, the Expert Group recognized that the nature of Tribunal proceedings is complex, and thus those proceedings could not be transformed into short-term events.
The Expert Group recognized the importance of allowing a Party, in respect of which a review is being undertaken, to participate in the meetings and deliberations of the committee.
The Expert Group recognized that the Task Force had addressed several of the pollutants that were also covered in its work and that the report would provide a useful complement.
The Expert Group recognized the need for a mechanism to stimulate relevant agencies to include drug control activities in their programme of work, particularly at the field level.
The DDT expert group recognized that there is a continued need for DDT in specific settings for disease vector control where effective or safer alternatives are still lacking.
The Expert Group recognized the importance of the international drug control treaties, which constituted the legal framework for international cooperation in countering the world drug problem.
The Expert Group recognized its work was scientific and technical but that its conclusions and recommendations would be important for helping policy makers with future decisions on emissions controls.
The Expert Group recognized the importance of continuing the work on black carbon, to the extent possible, within the resources available and in cooperation with other technical bodies of the Convention working on this issue.
The Expert Group recognized that Executive Body decision 1998/2 on information to be submitted and the procedures for adding substances to annexes I, II and III to the Protocol did not refer to specific criteria.
The expert group recognized that the proposed framework must be kept under review to allow, for instance, further development in response to emerging needs with respect to future summits and major conferences.
The Joint Expert Group recognized that, in the absence of such historical base cation deposition estimates, for the forthcoming call for dynamic modelling outputs these data would be estimated country by country.
The Joint Expert Group recognized the key challenge of strengthening the link between currently monitored parameters, incorporated in dynamic models, and parameters relevant in predicting ecological impacts.
The Expert Group recognizes the essentiality of the need for well-qualified lawyers in the Prosecution Section and encourages the continuation of training programmes currently being conducted for them.
The Expert Group recognizes that the fragile funding situation of UNDCP has limited its operational capacity.