Примеры использования Future instrument should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
He also emphasized that, in his view, the future instrument should.
Hence the future instrument should lay down such an obligation.
His delegation noted that it was suggested that the future instrument should be divided into two parts.
A future instrument should include arrangements on victim assistance and international co-operation and assistance.
In the opinion of several delegations, the future instrument should take account of the diversity of national criminal law systems.
It was felt that in order to facilitate the work of the group of volunteers a structure or an outline of the future instrument should be drawn up.
One delegation noted that the future instrument should not hamper the legitimate enforcement of the law.
He referred to the gaps in international law which, in his view, justified the preparation at the current stage of a legally binding international normative instrument andsuggested the most important points that the future instrument should cover.
There is another viewpoint: the future instrument should not be overburdened with definitions like the existing treaties on outer space.
His delegation therefore welcomed the timely initiative of the delegations of New Zealand and Ukraine in presenting their two draft conventions on the question of responsibility for attacks on United Nations personnel andshared the opinion expressed in document A/48/349 that any future instrument should be elaborated in stages.
Others thought that the future instrument should limit the instances in which domestic law would have to be amended.
The future instrument should also positively influence the implementation of domestic legislation on natural resource management.
He described the items which were listed in his report and which the future instrument should contain on protection against impunity, prevention, the right to compensation and the protection of children.
A future instrument should include a prohibition on the use, production, stockpiling and transfer of those cluster munitions that cause unacceptable harm to civilians.
Question 18 of the Green Paper reads as follows:"Do you believe that a future instrument should specify the law applicable to the conditions under which the assignment may be invoked against third parties?
The future instrument should therefore contain a precise definition of the right of disappeared individuals' families to learn the truth, with all the attendant legal consequences.
Regarding needs for personal identification,documentation and registration, a future instrument should articulate specific duties of States or non-governmental actors to meet such needs in the context of displacement;
The future instrument should be an efficient tool for addressing the challenges posed by unregulated trade in conventional weapons, including small arms and light weapons.
The question was raised whether the future instrument should ban special courts, especially military courts, from trying cases of enforced disappearance.
The future instrument should take the form of a draft framework convention containing the fundamental general principles on which aquifer States should base their conduct.
In view of Working Group's discussion at its first meeting on whether the future instrument should provide for the settlement of disputes by arbitration, the secretariat invited a representative of the Permanent Court of Arbitration(PCA) to provide relevant information at this meeting.
The future instrument should cover all domestic workers, both national and non-national, but it should also contain specific recommendations concerning migrant domestic workers.
At the same time, bearing in mind the significant expense involved in technical modification of such mines, the future instrument should include specific provisions relating to assistance in dealing with such problems. He also expressed support for the development of a Convention-wide compliance mechanism, which should be non-intrusive, cost-effective, transparent and acceptable to all.
The future instrument should also provide for an investigation mechanism along the lines of that established under article 20 of the Convention against Torture, which could be set in motion if the monitoring body received credible reports indicating that massive or systematic enforced disappearances were taking place in the territory of a State.
Support was expressed for the Working Group's proposal that the future instrument should be divided into two parts, the first containing general principles concerning nationality in all situations of State succession, and the second containing rules on specific situations of State succession.
The future instrument should certainly be a framework convention, but that was no reason not to give it some substance: it must set forth principles of which States would have to take account when negotiating future watercourse agreements while still having the possibility of adapting them to the characteristics and uses of the particular watercourse, as provided in article 3.
Similarly, it is essential that the future instrument should not affect or limit in any way the right to a legitimate defence, as enshrined in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations.
Delegations had agreed,however, that any future instrument should distinguish, as appropriate, between the situation of United Nations staff members and external individuals and should not erect barriers that discouraged staff from seeking external counsel.
Another said that any reference to vulnerable groups in the future instrument should mention indigenous peoples, who suffered disproportionately from the effects of mercury through their food sources and their close relationship to the environment, and that indigenous peoples must be able to participate fully in all mercury-related decision-making.
One delegation considered that the future instrument should stipulate that no privileges, immunities or exemptions provided for in domestic law would be allowed, except insofar as they were in keeping with its aim and purpose and without prejudice to the privileges, immunities or exemptions recognized in international law, including the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.