Примеры использования Genetic resources of areas на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
What are the capacity needs for access to, and use of, marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction?
With regard to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction, an understanding of what constituted the"country of origin" might be required.
Different views continued to be expressed regarding the legal regime applicable to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction.
Thus, in their view,the principle applicable to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction was that of the common heritage of mankind and a specific legal regime needed to be developed based on that principle.
What are the challenges in the effective participation in activities related to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction?
In that regard, it was observed that the greatest benefits to humanity from marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction would stem from the worldwide availability of products and scientific knowledge and the contributions those products and information brought to advancements in public health, food affordability and science, all of which could be impeded by a benefit-sharing regime.
Different views continued to be expressed regarding the regime applicable to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction.
In that regard, it was observed that the greatest benefits to humanity from marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction would stem from the worldwide availability of products and scientific knowledge and the contributions those products and information brought to advancements in public health, food affordability and science, all of which could be impeded by a benefit-sharing regime.
What are the costs incurred and the revenues generated from activities related to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction?
A view was expressed that existing regimes were not adequate for marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction and to address the concerns of developing countries.
Some delegations suggested that a public trusteeship could be established to collect and distribute royalties andbenefits relating to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction.
It was noted that it remained difficult to assess whether the potential of genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction was different from that of genetic resources of areas within national jurisdiction.
At the same time, it was pointed out that these instruments maynot be directly and fully applicable to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction.
It was noted that any disagreement that might exist on the legal status of marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction under the Convention should not constitute an obstacle to achieving a pragmatic solution to achieve benefit-sharing.
A view was expressed that the distribution of benefits should reflect the common heritage status of marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction.
It was advanced that the design of any future access and benefit-sharing regime for marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction would need to address the current lack of an obligation, under international law, to disclose the origin of organisms.
In that regard, many delegations stressed the need to address, in an international instrument, issues related to access to, andthe sharing of benefits from, marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction.
Many delegations considered that there was a legal gap with regard to access to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction and the sharing of benefits arising from their exploitation.
A view was also expressed that the Nagoya Protocol should be considered as the most comprehensiveexisting international framework to address the issue of access to, and benefit-sharing from, marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction.
Some delegations called for the application of the regime established in Part XI of the Convention to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction and for the expansion of the mandate of the International Seabed Authority.
A view was expressed that an implementing agreement to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea should be adopted to address access to, and benefit-sharing from,the utilization of marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction.
Several delegations expressed the view that access andbenefit-sharing related to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction was a key issue that should be addressed, including in any future normative instrument.
Some delegations noted that the relevant work being carried out under the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity(Nagoya Protocol) and under other organizations, such as the World Intellectual Property Organization(WIPO),could also be beneficial, while acknowledging that these may not be directly applicable to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction.
What are the social benefits of research, uses andapplications of marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction?
An observation was made that none of the existing approaches to benefit-sharing could be applied to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction, where resources were not subject to case-by-case mutually agreed terms, but where the users and providers could span many different sectors.
It was often impossible to establish which patents related to inventions based on marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction.
Some other delegations reiterated their view that the principle of the common heritage of mankind did not apply to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction, and that the freedom of the high seas applied to those resources instead.
A view was expressed that the existing Part XI regime dealt with consumption of minerals,whereas a system with respect to marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction would be in relation to sampling.
Similarly, few States have adopted laws orregulations related specifically to access to and benefit-sharing from the utilization of marine genetic resources of areas within national jurisdiction, such resources being encompassed, in most States, in broader laws and regulations on access and benefit-sharing.
Several delegations called for the expansion of the mandate of the International Seabed Authority to manage marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction and access and benefit-sharing related thereto.