Примеры использования His submission на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Counsel includes the report as part of his submission.
He did raise the matter in his submission of 15 December 1993 to the ADB.
In his submission, the Special Rapporteur underlined four main issues of importance.
Neither has the complainant provided details of any torture in his submission to the Committee.
As such, his submission of 27 March 1996 was introduced within the delay granted.
Люди также переводят
The complainant's counsel attached the judgement of the Federal Administrative Tribunal to his submission.
In his submission of 7 March 1995, counsel agrees to the examination of the merits at this stage.
Any further requirements in this area should be requested by the Secretary-General in his submission for 1998.
In his submission of 9 October 1998, the author also forwards a new claim under articles 7 and 10.
He therefore rejects the State party's assumption that he would have omitted to mention this fact in his submission.
In his submission of 24 June 1992, the author complains about the prison conditions and the treatment he is subjected to in prison.
Within[30-90] calendar days of the applicant's receipt of the response to his submission of the decision to management evaluation; or.
In his submission of 8 January 2002, the complainant makes additional submission confirming his previous claims.
On 17 January 2012,the author's counsel inquired whether Spain would be asked to provide observations on his submission of December 2011.
In his submission of 25 September 2000, the author claims that all effective legal remedies have been exhausted in his case.
I would also like to thank the Secretary-General for his submission to the General Assembly of his first report on human security A/64/701.
He hoped his submission would encourage the Committee to highlight those problems in its concluding observations and help bring about a change of policy.
While the author does not invoke any provision of the Covenant,it transpires from his submission that he claims to be a victim of arbitrary detention and of acts of torture.
In his submission dated 13 November 1997, the author contends that the State party's observations are wrong and that the communication is admissible.
Having studied the report of the Secretary-General on Joint Arab Action and his submission to the Council on the development of education at pan-Arab level.
In his submission, the author claims to be victim of a violation of articles 7, 14, paragraph 2 and subparagraph 3(a), and articles 17 and 26 of the Covenant.
The author argues before the Committee that the Court should have considered his submission of 25 April 2005 as a second application for amparo.
In his submission on 12 July 2003, the author adds that his mental health condition has deteriorated due to the stress of awaiting his execution.
In this regard, the Advisory Committee requests the Secretary-General to address this issue prior to his submission of the report on the Tribunal mentioned in paragraph 3 above.
The fourth author failed to specify, in his submission of 11 June 2003, when and whether he had paid any contributions and whether he had been ordered to do so by the authorities.
The Commission supported these comments and asked the Executive Secretary to take them into account in finalizing his submission to United Nations Headquarters.
The author specifically referred to this decision in his submission, and only referred to the decision No. 12 Co. 452/91 as part of numerous pieces of supporting evidence.
In his submission on 23 April 2001, the author cited the Constitutional Court ruling of 28 June 1999 to allege that it was not necessary to lodge an amparo application before the Constitutional Court.
Prior to considering the merits of the case,the Committee notes that the author formulates new claims in his submission of 20 April 2009 after the Committee's decision on admissibility.
In his submission dated 18 April 2002, the author replies to the State party's observations of 18 February 2002, reiterating the same arguments that he made on 2 January 2002.