Примеры использования Human rights committee decided на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
On 16 March 1995, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible.
The Human Rights Committee decided in 1996 that,“under very exceptional circumstances”, when a report is overdue“because of material difficulties”, the State party could be invited to send a delegation to discuss those difficulties or be asked to submit a provisional report dealing only with certain aspects of the Covenant A/51/40, para. 32.
Accordingly, on 21 July 1998, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible.
Accordingly, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible insofar as it appeared to raise issues under article 14, paragraph 3(b) and(e) of the Covenant.
Accordingly, on 20 March 1998, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible.
On 9 March 2004, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible in so far as it appeared to raises issues under articles 9 and 14 of the Covenant.
At its meeting on 30 March 2004, the Human Rights Committee decided to rule communication No 1008/2001 inadmissible under article 3 of the Optional Protocol.
On 20 March 1992, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible in so far as it appeared to raise issues under article 7 of the Covenant.
Also during its eighty-fifth session, the Human Rights Committee decided to conduct its agenda item on follow-up to concluding observations in public.
If the Human Rights Committee decided to develop indicators for all the rights recognized in the Covenant, it would be setting itself a task that far exceeded its capacity.
At its thirty-fifth session, in March 1989, the Human Rights Committee decided to designate a special rapporteur authorized to process new communications and requests for interim measures.
On 3 November 1993, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible in so far as it may raise issues under articles 6 and 7 of the Covenant.
Pursuant to rule 69A, paragraph 3,of its rules of procedure, the Human Rights Committee decided to publish the provisional concluding observations on the Gambia that were adopted and transmitted to the State party at its seventy-fifth session.
Accordingly, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible insofar as it might raise issues under articles 6, paragraph 1; 7; 10, paragraph 1; and 14, paragraphs 3(b),(c), and 5, of the Covenant.
At its ninety-fourth session from 13 to 31 October 2008, the Human Rights Committee decided to revise its general comment on article 19(freedom of expression) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. .
Accordingly, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible in so far as it might raise issues under article 9, paragraph 3, and article 14, subparagraphs 3(b),(c) and(d), juncto article 6, paragraph 2, of the Covenant.
At its ninety-fourth session, held from 13 to 31 October 2008, the Human Rights Committee decided to revise its General Comment 10 on article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights on freedom of expression.
Accordingly, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible insofar as it might raise issues under articles 6, 7 and, in respect of the conduct of the authors' appeal, article 14, paragraphs 1, 3(b) and(d) and 5, of the Covenant.
Accordingly, on 30 June 1994 the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible insofar as it might raise an issue under article 12 of the Covenant.
Accordingly, on 16 March 1994, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible inasmuch as it appeared to raise issues under articles 9, 10, 14 and 26 of the Covenant.
At its thirteenth session held in July 1981, the Human Rights Committee decided that States parties should submit periodic reports concerning the implementation of the provisions of the Covenant every five years.
At its thirteenth session,held in July 1981, the Human Rights Committee decided that States parties should submit periodic reports concerning the implementation of the provisions of the Covenant every five years.
In a number of cases the Human Rights Committee decided that human rights investigations with a wide scope did not constitute an examination of"the same matter" as an individual claim within the meaning of article 5(2)(a) of CCPR-OP.
Accordingly, on 6 July 1995, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible insofar as it might raise issues under articles 7 and 10, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, in respect of the alleged ill-treatment in detention.
Accordingly, on 24 July 1998, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible insofar as it related to the author's arrest and detention on 22 November 1991, the slander proceedings initiated against him on 21 April 1992, and his claim that he was a victim of discrimination.
At its ninety-ninth session(July 2010), the Human Rights Committee decided to consider the situation of civil and political rights in Dominica at its 102nd session(July 2011) in the absence of a report, as the State party had not submitted its initial report, due in 1994.
For example, at its eighty-eighth session, in October 2006, the Human Rights Committee decided to consider the situation of civil and political rights in Grenada at its ninetieth session, in July 2007, since the State party had not submitted its initial report, which was due on 5 December 1992.
Accordingly, on 15 March 1995, the Human Rights Committee decided that the communication was admissible insofar as it appeared to raise issues under article 7(in respect to the maltreatment upon arrest), article 10 and article 14, paragraph 3(b),(d)(with respect to the preliminary hearing and the trial),(e) and(g), of the Covenant.
Similarly, in view of the fact that the Human Rights Committee decided, at its eightieth session, held from 16 March to 3 April 2004, to prepare a new General Comment concerning article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the rapporteur suggests that the present report should be forwarded to the Committee as a useful contribution to work on this new General Comment.
Therefore, the Human Rights Committee decides that.