Примеры использования Hungary indicated на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Hungary indicated that various legal provisions might help in the procedural determination.
A number of countries(e.g. France, Georgia and Hungary) indicated their interest in this area of work.
Similarly, Hungary indicated its interest in contributing to the WHO-EURO Voluntary Fund.
While noting that effective interaction between society andthe State was an essential factor, Hungary indicated that that goal was hindered by the lack of independence of the judiciary.
Hungary indicated that specific technical assistance was needed to fully implement the measures set forth in article 55.
Introducing the combined fourth and fifth periodic report,the representative of Hungary indicated that her Government remained strongly committed to international protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Hungary indicated that on 14 October 2005, it destroyed its 1,500 anti-personnel mines previously retained under Article 3.
With regard to measures to permit its courts to order payment of compensation or damages to another State party(para.(b)),Armenia reported partial compliance while Azerbaijan and Hungary indicated full implementation of such measures.
Hungary indicated that it is on track to complete all work within the previously communicated time-frame i.e., by 31 August 2013.
Reporting on measures for the return of confiscated property upon request by another State party, as prescribed by paragraph 2, Armenia and Slovenia stated that their cited legislation was fully compliant,while Azerbaijan and Hungary indicated partial implementation of the provision.
Hungary indicated that any criminal proceedings conducted under universal jurisdiction shall be instituted by the Prosecutor General.
Representatives of Ukraine, Romania and Hungary indicated general interest in the project, but requested time for internal consultations about the proposal.
Hungary indicated that it welcomed the upcoming closure of the Guantanamo detention camp and asked about the intention to grant asylum to inmates.
The representative of Hungary indicated that he would prepare a short document on this issue for consideration by the Working Party at its forthcoming session.
Hungary indicated that the total amount of area originally of concern(i.e., a strip of land 1,000 metres wide by 79,683 metres long), should be dealt with by the end of the 2013 summer.
The Government of Hungary indicated that it had no further comments in addition to the documents provided regarding scheduling of mephedrone.
Hungary indicated that it had established an early warning system for professionals working in the field of childcare and child protection whose duty it was to report to the competent authorities whenever they suspected any crime committed against a minor.
In its follow-up response, Hungary indicated that victims seeking help from the victim support service were offered individualized support responding to the specific needs arisen in consequence of a crime.
Romania and Hungary indicated that they would be willing to work with these two countries to further define the concept and cooperate on the project.
Finland and Hungary indicated the importance of, and need for, a cross-sectoral collaboration on geographic information data at national level and with a clear focus on the INSPIRE process.
In this regard, Hungary indicated that it would support work on flood management in Ukraine and assist in the work on target-setting and reporting under the Protocol on Water and Health in the Republic of Moldova.
It is clear that Hungary indicated its unwillingness to comply with some of the provisions of the Treaty from 1989, through the suspension of works required by the Treaty; it is also clear that, once the reasons given by Hungary for its action were held to be legally insufficient, this refusal entailed its responsibility for breach of those very provisions.
Some countries(e.g. the Czech Republic and Hungary) indicate that there are some schools that have adopted a"whole-institution" approach, but that this includes only a minority of all educational institutions.
The trade register of Hungary indicates that Igor Nechaev and Vladimir Artyushchik also co-owned METRATEK Kft at that time.
Hungary also indicated its interest in providing its annual contribution to the WHO-EURO Voluntary Fund.
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Hungary and Slovenia indicated full compliance with article 15.
Austria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary and Lithuania indicated that there were some differences.
Hungary and Slovenia indicated that their legislation was not in compliance with the provision under review.
Hungary, Latvia and Ukraine indicated the bodies involved.
He read out the last three sentences of those observations, and indicated that Hungary could not support that line of argument.