Примеры использования Immunity would на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In other respects, immunity would be waived.
Such immunity would continue to be accorded after termination of their business.
You said diplomatic immunity would be respected.
Lawyers for the victim's relatives were said to have urged Italian authorities to bring to justice a fourth person,"an Iranian whose diplomatic immunity would keep him from being prosecuted.
Nutrients that immunity would be ready to give“half its kingdom” for!- lyl-immunup!
In addition, a note to the effect that the Rules had no effect on immunity would be included in the report.
The post Nutrients that immunity would be ready to give“half its kingdom” for!
While possibly relevant to a discussion on criminal proceedings against officials of other States,questions concerning criminal immunity would be best avoided under the current agenda item for three reasons.
Were it otherwise, State immunity would, in substance and effect, virtually become State impunity, exercisable according to the will of another State.
The decisions to waive immunity in those cases were made because immunity would have impeded the course of justice.
A uniform international legal system governing State immunity would provide clarity and legal certainty, encourage commercial transactions and provide useful guidance to legislators and national courts.
An in-depth review of the distinction between acta jure imperii and acta jure gestionis in the law of State immunity would also be helpful in establishing a list of official acts.
As to draft article 4,it was his delegation's understanding that immunity would apply in respect of acts performed prior to an official's term of office only if the criminal jurisdiction of a third State was to be exercised during the term of office of the official concerned.
Furthermore, the question of reciprocity would arise,since the granting of State immunity would necessarily differ according to the applicable law.
Members of the diplomatic community who enjoyed immunity would not be required to appear in judicial proceedings.
However, once the State concerned has been fully informed and given an appropriate time for reflection(which need not be very long),non-invocation of immunity would usually have to be considered as constituting an implied waiver.
Although it might be inferred from draft article 4(Scope of immunity ratione personae) that such immunity would apply during and after representation of the State or the exercise of State functions, it would be valuable to expressly indicate the norm.
The Executive Secretary to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change shall have the right and the duty to waive the immunity of any member or alternate member in any case where,in his or her opinion, the immunity would impede the course of justice and it can be waived without prejudice to the interests of the operation of this Protocol.
The Executive Secretary of the secretariat shall have the right and the duty to waive the immunity of any individual referred to in paragraph[1] above in any case where,in his or her opinion, the immunity would impede the course of justice and can be waived without prejudice to the interests of the[operation and implementation of[the Kyoto Protocol][this agreement]] operation and implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its related legal instruments.
Accordingly, States should criminalize and penalize corruption(see General Assembly resolution 58/4, article 15), and any existing criminal immunity of corrupt judges and prosecutors should be lifted;they should not be"above the law", as total immunity would only nourish distrust among the public with regard to judges and prosecutors in the justice system.
On the contrary,there was no case to his knowledge that concluded that such immunity would not be extended to officials beyond the troika.
The implication of the court's reasoning is that had they enjoyed immunity, that immunity would have extended to bar the validity of such subpoenas.
Judicial immunity needs to be limited and serve its purpose of protecting the independence of justice operators;total immunity would only nourish distrust among the public towards the justice system as a whole.
The Executive-Secretary shall have the right and the duty to waive the immunity of any individual in any case where,in the Executive-Secretary's opinion, the immunity would impede the course of justice and can be done without prejudice to the implementation of this Protocol.
Accordingly, the Organization will disclose documents and/or information and waive immunity on a case-by-case basis where,in the opinion of the Secretary-General, immunity would impede the course of justice and can be waived without prejudice to the interests of the United Nations.
Accordingly, the Organization will release documents and/or information and waive immunity on a case-by-case basis where,in the opinion of the Secretary-General, immunity would impede the course of justice and can be waived without prejudice to the interests of the United Nations.
Accordingly, the Organization will disclose documents and/or information and waive immunity on a case-by-case basis where,in the opinion of the Secretary-General, immunity would impede the course of justice and can be waived without prejudice to the interests of the United Nations.
Accordingly, the Organization will disclose documents and/or information and waive immunity on a case-by-case basis where,in the opinion of the Secretary-General, immunity would impede the course of justice and can be waived without prejudice to the interests of the United Nations.
Thus, in both cases, the Secretary-General had followed the normal practice of waiving immunity when he determined, according to the merits of a particular case, that immunity would impede the course of justice and that it could be waived without prejudice to the interests of the United Nations.
Consequently, the Executive Director has the right and the duty to waive the immunity of a person represented on any board, panel, group orother institution established by this Protocol in any case where in the opinion of the Executive Director the immunity would impede the course of justice, and it can be waived without prejudice to the purpose for which the immunity is accorded.