Примеры использования Incurred by governments на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Programme expenditure incurred by Governments.
The Panel therefore decided that"the costs incurred by Governments in evacuating citizens from Saudi Arabia and Israel should be compensated on the same basis as those costs incurred by Governments in evacuating persons from Iraq or Kuwait.
Programme expenditure incurred by Governments.
Consequently, the Panel decides that costs incurred by Governments in evacuating their citizens from Iraq or Kuwait during the period of 2 August 1990 to 2 March 1991 should be compensated to the extent they are adequately supported by documentary or other appropriate evidence.
Programme expenditure incurred by Governments.
Although the costs incurred by Governments in the evacuation of other nationals, i.e. citizens of countries different from the evacuating Government, from Iraq or Kuwait are not expressly mentioned in decision 7, the Panel understands that the Governing Council intended that such costs also be considered to be direct losses.
In the Third Report the Panel considered the compensability of claims for costs incurred by Governments in purchasing safety equipment.
Programme expenditure incurred by Governments advances: operating funds provided to Governments. .
Table 2 shows, at the date of finalizationof the Board's report, the audit reports received in respect of expenditure incurred by Governments and NGOs for the last three bienniums.
Audit of programme expenditure incurred by Governments and non-governmental organizations, 1990-1995.
At the date of finalization of the financial statements,audit certificates had not been received in respect of programme expenditure totalling $84.1 million incurred by Governments and non-governmental organizations.
Expenditures on social transfers in kind are incurred by governments and NPISHs and form part of their final consumption expenditures.
With regard to expenses incurred by governments in providing medical services to members of their populations, Iraq argues that there is no basis for awarding compensation for such expenses since this is a basic service which governments provide in general whether there is only one patient or more patients to be treated.
These expenditures relate to reimbursements at standardrates of extra and extraordinary costs incurred by Governments in providing troops to United Nations peace-keeping operations.
Accordingly, the Panel decides that the costs incurred by Governments in evacuating other nationals from Iraq and Kuwait should be compensable on the same basis as those costs incurred by Governments in evacuating their own citizens.
However, the Panel also found that general expenses, such as overtime salaries andtravel costs of staff, incurred by Governments in connection with their evacuation operations should not be awarded.
Consequently, the Panel decides that the costs incurred by Governments in evacuating citizens from Saudi Arabia and Israel should be compensated on the same basis as those costs incurred by Governments in evacuating persons from Iraq or Kuwait.
In the First Report, the Panel determined that, although the Governing Council decision did not expressly refer to costs incurred by Governments in the evacuation of individuals of nationalities other than their own, such costs would be compensable on the same basis as those incurred by Governments in the evacuation of their own nationals. The First Report, para.
For those reasons, the Panel decided that“the costs incurred by Governments in evacuating citizens from Saudi Arabia and Israel should be compensated on the same basis as those costs incurred by Governments in evacuating persons from Iraq or Kuwait”; in contrast, it did not award compensation for costs of evacuating citizens from other countries in the Middle East, including Turkey, Iran, and Syria. Ibid., para. 96; see also, para.
Consequently, the“F1” Panel determined that costs incurred by Governments in evacuating citizens from Saudi Arabia and Israel should be compensated on the same basis as those costs incurred by Governments in evacuating persons from Iraq or Kuwait.
In the Panel's view, the same reasoning applies to expenses incurred by Government officials operating from their home state.
In principle, all project activities and their associated costs, as defined in the Country Programme Action Plan, annual project workplans andproject documents are incurred by government counterpart agencies.
New Zealand stated that it had introduced legislation(Fisheries Act 1996)which enabled the recovery of costs of“conservation services” incurred by government agencies as a result of commercial fishing activities, through the application of a levy on the fishing industry.
This comprised $59 million incurred by government implementing partners, $34 million incurred by international non-governmental organizations and $44 million by local non-governmental organizations.
However, in accordance with the reasoning set out in paragraphs 56 and 57 above,no compensation is recommended for general operational costs incurred by Government departments and officials involved in the evacuation operations since they are not of such an extraordinary nature as to warrant their compensability.
However, in accordance with the reasoning set out in paragraphs 56 and 57 above,compensation is not recommended for general operational costs incurred by Government departments and officials involved in the evacuation operations since they are not of such an extraordinary nature as to warrant their compensability.
The Administrator indicates that, in principle, all project activities and their associated costs, as defined in the Country Programme Action Plan, annual project workplans and project documents,are incurred by government counterpart agencies under the national execution/national implementation modality(NEX/NIM), which implies that all related institutional costs are fully recovered by UNDP, as extrabudgetary resources, through the application of the 7 per cent cost-recovery policy with respect to general management services approved by the Executive Board in its decision 2007/18 ibid., para. 136.
In 2005, UNFPA received NEX audit project reports for expenditure amounting to $86,875,334,representing 77 per cent of the total expenditure incurred on projects executed by Governments and NGOs.
As indicated in section IV above, prior to 16 June 1993 the financing of the administrative and logistic costs of the Force, as well as certain extra andextraordinary costs incurred by troop-contributing Governments, which were borne by the Organization, were dependent entirely on voluntary contributions from Governments. .
Noting that voluntary contributions were insufficient to cover all the costs of the Force,including those incurred by troop-contributing Governments prior to 16 June 1993, and regretting the absence of an adequate response to appeals for voluntary contributions, including that contained in the letter dated 17 May 1994 from the Secretary-General to all Member States.