Примеры использования Interests of third states на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It cannot be frustrated by the geopolitical interests of third States.
If they affect the interests of third States, as they do in this case, the international community has even more reason for concern.
The policy of economic blockade against Cuba infringes upon the rights and legitimate interests of third States.
This United States law also damages the interests of third States by inhibiting commercial transactions with Cuba.
Sanctions should be imposed only after all peaceful means had been exhausted andbearing in mind the interests of third States.
When they affect the interests of third States, as is the case here, the international community has even greater reasons to be concerned and to speak out.
The European Union's draft resolution laid the basis for a compromise which reflected the common interests of third States affected by sanctions.
If, as in the present case,they affect the interests of third States, the international community has even greater reason to be concerned and to speak out.
The Court held that the delimitation line follows the equidistance line in a southerly direction until the point beyond which the interests of third States may be affected.
If they affect the interests of third States, as in the case currently under the scrutiny of the General Assembly, the international community has even more reason for concern.
The measures in question often extend extraterritorial application of domestic rules,adversely affecting the interests of third States and their nationals.
Mr. VORSTER(South Africa)said that the interests of third States should be safeguarded in cases when each user of an international watercourse might be significantly affected.
That was partly because it was the Court's consistent practice, in cases involving a maritime delimitation,to stop the delimitation line at any point where it might affect the interests of third States.
Ukraine considered that special attention should be attached to the proposals to mobilize other possibilities in order toprotect the economic interests of third States, especially those which did not require additional funding from the international donor community.
The Charter was not intended to harm the interests of third States, and it provided a mechanism, so far unused by the Council, whereby the Council could consult the States concerned and ascertain their views before deciding to impose sanctions.
The view was expressed that, in many instances, sanctions caused severe damage to the population of a third State with links to the target State andthat the relevant provisions of the Charter were never intended to harm the interests of third States.
A thorough legal analysis must be made of the entire spectrum of compensation and other measures so as toprotect the economic interests of third States, chiefly the developing and least developed countries, and also in order to enhance the effectiveness of the sanctions by encouraging States to respect them.
On that occasion, MERCOSUR and its associate members also affirmed that the application of domestic laws was contrary to the need to promote dialogue and to ensure the fulfilment of the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, andthat it undermined the sovereignty of States and affected the interests of third States.
Regarding the activities of the working group on the implementation of Charter provisions related to assistance to third States, she reiterated that it was important, in the interests of third States, to see the work of the sanctions committees professionalized and conducted in a transparent manner.
Unfortunately, sanctions frequently also inflict large-scale damage on the interests of third States and their peoples whose interests are linked to those of the State on which the sanctions are imposed, as has been the case with regard to Egypt, because of considerations the details of which lie outside the scope of our discussions today.
On that occasion, the States members and associate members of MERCOSUR also affirmed that the application of unilateral coercive measures contradicts the norms of international law,and at the same time affects the interests of third States, raises international tensions and weakens the fight against shared threats.
We should mention here that the aim is not simply to make a theoretical or technical evaluation but to implement Article 50 of theCharter in full and to place the Security Council before its responsibility with regard to non-impairment of the interests of third States and alleviation of the severity of such impairment where it is determined to have occurred.
Since it began in 1988, this mandate has been linked to the defence of the right of self-determination of the peoples of Africa who, set up as independent States after decolonization,had to contend with the illegal actions of mercenaries who, serving the interests of third States or economic groups, devoted themselves to sabotaging their political and economic stability.
The text expresses the need to protect life at sea as a positive obligation andincorporates a reference to the interests of third parties who are not States, as proposed.
However, in adjudicating disputes, the Court was always careful to avoid judgments that would affect the interests or rights of third States-- for example, in determining maritime boundaries-- and a statement to that effect was always included in the reasoning of the judgment.
The intensified extraterritorial nature of this policy, particularly under the administration of President George W. Bush,is also-- to an increasing degree-- harmful to the sovereignty of third States and to the legitimate interests of entities and persons under their jurisdiction.
The States having recourse to measures shall take into account the interests of individuals and of third States, as well as the effect of such measures on the standard of living of the population concerned.
The unilateral embargo against the Republic of Cuba imposed by the United States of America, bypassing the United Nations, is not only an impediment to the Cuba economy butalso an infringement of the rights and legitimate interests of Cuban citizens living in other States and of nationals of third States.
Obviously for every act of aggression there is a victim State; indeed it was the possible disparity between the interests of the victim State and those of third States which Sir Ian Sinclair had noted.
The Court stated that, in accordance with its consistent practice, when drawing a line delimiting the maritime areas between the parties to the main proceedings, that it would, whenever necessary, end the line in question before it reached an area in which the interests of a legal nature of third States might become involved.