Примеры использования Interreligious communication на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Formal and informal interreligious communication.
Interreligious communication can take place in formal or informal settings.
Appreciating diversity of interreligious communication.
Thematically, interreligious communication can address a multitude of different issues.
The role of the State in promoting interreligious communication.
The potential of interreligious communication for overcoming violence in the name of religion is enormous.
His conclusions andrecommendations with regard to interreligious communication are reflected in section IV.
Interreligious communication harbours an inexhaustible diversity of themes, settings, goals and procedures.
The Special Rapporteur then focuses on the role of the State in promoting interreligious communication.
Intrareligious and interreligious communication must play a crucial role in this continuous endeavour.
Moreover, schools anduniversity campuses are seen as pivotal places where interreligious communication occurs.
Encouraging interreligious communication by publicly expressing their appreciation for well-defined dialogue projects;
In section III, the Special Rapporteur puts a thematic focus on the role of the State in promoting interreligious communication.
Indeed, interreligious communication does not exclusively take place in a framework specifically dedicated to religious issues.
Under freedom of religion or belief,States have an obligation to promote interreligious communication and take active measures in this area.
In other words, interreligious communication does not necessarily need to take place in a framework specifically dedicated to religious issues.
Finally, State institutions, such as public schools,provide a very important venue for both informal and formal interreligious communication.
Interreligious communication and intergroup cooperation have a key function in all agendas to overcome violence in the name of religion.
As mentioned earlier, it would be wrong to see formal and informal interreligious communication as contradictory; rather, they mutually complement each other.
State-sponsored interreligious communication, if conducted in an inappropriate manner, can unfortunately have serious negative side effects.
Besides its instrumental role in the eradication of stereotypes and prejudices,intra- and interreligious communication falls within the scope of freedom of religion or belief.
Hence, when supporting interreligious communication, the State remains under the obligation to always respect the freedom of religion or belief.
Religious intolerance and terrorism were indeed linked, andpreventive activities should be undertaken to promote interreligious communication and prevent misunderstandings, with a view to achieving long-term cooperation.
If not conducted appropriately, interreligious communication could have serious negative side effects for States, if they were perceived to favour one religion or belief, for example.
While many participants of dialogue projects will probably appreciate active State involvement, others might be more sceptical orgenerally favour interreligious communication without the presence of State representatives.
Both approaches-- formal as well as informal interreligious communication-- have their specific advantages and thus should be promoted in conjunction.
By 2016, Russia turned it into a controllable territory with functional state institutions, well-developed social space(healthcare,education, interreligious communication, culture) and high level of security for common citizenry.
As mentioned earlier,the possibility of intra- and interreligious communication itself has the status of a universal human rights claim within the scope of freedom of religion or belief.
The best antidote to hate speech is"more speech", in the sense of nuanced and precise media reporting, self-regulating bodies and a fair representation of religious and other minorities within the media, careful fact-finding in order to dispel myths and check negative gossiping, public statements by civil society organizations,sustainable interreligious communication and clear anti-violence messages sent by religious communities, as elaborated above.
There can be no doubt that activities of intrareligious and interreligious communication in the broadest sense fall within the scope of freedom of religion or belief.