Примеры использования It is difficult to understand why на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Yet in most cases it is difficult to understand why the malam has chosen a particular figure.
Indexing large-capitalization North American equities has become a standard practice in multi-billion dollar pension funds, and it is difficult to understand why the Fund has not taken advantage of this scheme in the past.
It is difficult to understand why it has not been at least given a chance to bear fruit.
Given the comprehensive anddetailed admissions by FNL, it is difficult to understand why the report uses the conditional mood in detailing the actions of FNL.
It is difficult to understand why the Group came up with falsehoods and misconceived conclusions against Uganda in this way.
At this point in human history andin the history of this body, it is difficult to understand why this forum, in particular, does not have a mechanism for this purpose.
It is difficult to understand why only cases where the terrorist is"an agent or representative of a State" should be covered.
However, noting that there is no majority or when the arbitral tribunal hasitself given authority to the president, then it is difficult to understand why there should be a further power to revise the award, being only procedural in nature, given to the arbitral tribunal.
From that, it is difficult to understand why the left parties have not investigated this or denounced this earlier?
In the light of the foregoing, it is difficult to understand why such inordinate emphasis is being placed on conventional disarmament.
It is difficult to understand why, in the light of similar established facts, the Committee draws different conclusions according to the legal arguments put forward by the parties.
Given this widespread andlong-term ERW problem it is difficult to understand why the mistakes of 1978 and 1982 were repeated in the same small area of Lebanon, to a far greater order of magnitude, in 2006, 28 years later.
It is difficult to understand why official development assistance levels should be declining to historical lows when some of the donor countries are enjoying surpluses.
In such circumstances, it is difficult to understand why the authorities took 10 years to authorize registration of the non-governmental organization International Peace Brigades.
It is difficult to understand why the Sub-Commission should suspend its efforts, rather than assuming a leadership role in relation to other bodies and organs of the international system.
It is difficult to understand why, in view of the logic of the rule change permitting that judge to participate in appeals, the disqualification practice at the Trial Chamber level should continue to be observed.
It is difficult to understand why there is no connection between the political determination expressed here by States, the essential components of the protagonists of international life, and the international financial institutions.
It is difficult to understand why today we must launch donor appeals to deal with the large-scale destruction of houses by a Government that deliberately leaves some 500,000 of its citizens homeless.
In these circumstances, it is difficult to understand why the Government of Israel has not made plans with the Palestinian Authority to avoid a humanitarian disaster in the Palestinian community during the one-month withdrawal period.
Thirdly, it is difficult to understand why the logical framework should ignore Israel's ongoing occupation of parts of southern Lebanon, its continued breaches of Lebanese airspace, and its threat to United Nations forces in southern Lebanon, all of which pose a genuine danger to Lebanon's sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity.
It is difficult to understand why there is so much resistance to the idea of working multilaterally and launching negotiations on nuclear disarmament and the prevention of an arms race in outer space, when both questions are closely linked with current tensions, even if the problems of today's world are only to be seen through the prism of the campaign against international terrorism.
It is difficult to understand why, even though these points were raised by the authors-- and, what is more, were not contested by the State-- the Committee systematically restricts its mandate to find violations of the Covenant, when the authors do not invoke or mention a specific article of the Covenant or-- and this is worse-- even where the authors do so, as here, but in conjunction with other articles of the Covenant and not separately.
It is difficult to understand why the Commission needed four years to finalize its report when the investigations and the trials lasted altogether a maximum of eight weeks(July-August 1992), including the time required to get permission from the Attorney General for special investigative procedures in the case of civilians, confirmations of sentences by the commander of the military zone and finally ratification by the Commander-in-Chief.
It is difficult to understand why the logical framework that is proposed for review should ignore Israel's ongoing occupation of parts of southern Lebanon, its continued breaches of Lebanese airspace and its threat to United Nations forces in southern Lebanon, despite the fact that they all constitute a threat to, and a genuine violation of, Lebanon's sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity and are therefore an ongoing violation by Israel of resolution 1559 2004.
It is difficult to understand why the logical framework, proposed for review, should ignore Israel's ongoing occupation of parts of southern Lebanon, its continued breaches of Lebanese airspace, and its threat to United Nations forces in southern Lebanon, despite the fact that they all constitute a threat to, and a genuine violation of, Lebanon's sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity and are therefore an ongoing violation by Israel of resolution 1559 2004.
It was difficult to understand why the Government had not ratified ILO Convention No. 169.
It was difficult to understand why Macedonian was the only official language of criminal proceedings.
It was difficult to understand why that should be regarded as objectionable.
It was difficult to understand why it was classified merely as a harmful traditional practice.
It was difficult to understand why EU countries, which upheld important human rights principles, were reticent to ratify a fundamental instrument.