Примеры использования It was hard to understand на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It was hard to understand him, though.
Women accounted for only 14 per cent of members in local government bodies, and it was hard to understand why their number was so low.
It was hard to understand him the first time, because we did not conduct joint training.
Additionally, while the Committee had decided to replace the MER by the PARE in a number specific cases, it was hard to understand why that could not also be done in the case of the countries of Latin America.
It was hard to understand why Australia had inquired about minority rights for Turkish citizens of Kurdish origin.
One example of a temporary special measure was a decision by the University of Malawi to reserve 30 per cent of its places for women, but it was hard to understand why that figure had been set at 30 per cent rather than 50 per cent.
It was hard to understand why the Unit had been singled out since it was not the only oversight body that had not proposed any reduction.
The overall cost was not unreasonable for a deployed force of 120,000 troops, commented a third speaker,though the scale of assessments was skewed and it was hard to understand why so many battalions were needed for what were largely monitoring and observation missions.
It was hard to understand why five years had elapsed before the authorities had taken effective measures, despite the attention which Amnesty International had focused on the case year after year.
If the intention behind the secretariat's proposals was to give less weight to seniority andlay more emphasis on levels of responsibility, it was hard to understand why the current oversized scale, which had many more steps than the scales of other international organizations such as OECD and the European Union, had been left untouched.
It was hard to understand my role in extractive industries transparency until I heard of the gender sensitive value chain(Extracting Equality) at the Publish What You Pay workshop.
While resources must be used efficiently, it was hard to understand how new challenges could be met with a regular budget that did not increase.
It was hard to understand why the Secretariat could not present a full budget for UNMIT until mid-February 2007, given that the United Nations had been present in the country for over seven years.
While resources must be used efficiently, it was hard to understand how new challenges could be met with a regular budget that did not cover the priorities set by Member States.
It was hard to understand how the United Nations could be a party to statements which deliberately ignored the pronouncements of its own judicial body, as endorsed by the General Assembly.
Given the different bases for those figures, it was hard to understand the rationale for the suggestion that career posts should comprise 75 per cent of regular budget posts.
It was hard to understand otherwise why it continued to harass Gibraltar and why its subjective feeling that Gibraltar was part of its territory could overrule the right of Gibraltarians to choose for themselves.
If prevention was better than cure, it was hard to understand how failure to perform a duty that had not resulted in an effect could give rise to an actionable cause.
It was hard to understand how democratic nations founded on the principle of human rights and fundamental freedoms could remain passive in the face of the suffering inflicted upon Palestinian and Syrian populations by Israeli occupation forces and settlers.
In view of the functions listed in paragraph 5.68, it was hard to understand why the Office of the United Nations Special Coordinator in the Occupied Territories(UNSCO) was included under section 5.
However, it was hard to understand how the Secretary-General could assert in paragraph 10 that, where price was not the only determinant, the reading out of price information for requests for proposals caused delays in the procurement process.
The same representative stressed that since the proposed international criminal tribunal would be judging individuals andnot States, it was hard to understand what role might be played in such cases by an organ which was empowered under the Charter to consider and decide on questions having to do with the behaviour of States as such, but not with the acts of individuals, particularly when the problems being dealt with did not affect international peace and security.
It was hard to understand why some members of that Committee did not want to fulfil their obligations and define an approach for identifying cases where MERs should be replaced with PAREs, despite the explicit instructions given by the General Assembly in its resolution 64/248.
Given Greece's direct responsibility for those events, it was hard to understand how that country's representative could make accusations against Turkey such as those contained in his statement, which had been full of distortions and half-truths.
Consequently, it was hard to understand under what circumstances any objection could be raised to the principles of the Charter or how they could be deemed incompatible with a system that sought to uphold the primacy of the law and to guarantee and protect the fundamental rights of all individuals.
Since both types of judges undertake the same kind of work for the United Nations it was hard to understand why the immunities enjoyed by the judges of the Dispute Tribunal under section 18 of the General Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations differed so markedly from those of the judges of the Appeals Tribunal under section 22.
Ms. Gnacadja said that it was hard to understand why legal reform was taking so long and why the report was silent on the matter, since the Government-- armed with constitutional proclamation of equality and in view of the precedence of international treaties-- was in a good position to change the laws.
Furthermore, it was hard to understand how, less than two months after the Secretary-General's introduction of the proposed programme budget for the biennium 2010-2011, which contained a provision for special political missions of about $829 million, the estimated requirement for those missions for 2010-2011 had increased to almost $1,200 million.
It is hard to understand how the Church could exist without a head or a ruler.
Nevertheless, sometimes it is hard to understand: when exactly a product fully satisfies its requirements?