Примеры использования Its submission dated на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In its submission dated 16 January 1992, the State party challenges the Committee's admissibility decision.
In its submission dated July 1997, the Claimant asserted a claim for interest in the amount of KWD 53,595.
In its submission, dated 24 September 1991, the State party argues that the communication is inadmissible.
In its submission, dated 12 December 1994, the State party argues that the legislation in question is not discriminatory.
In its submission, dated 14 January 1992, the State party denies that the Covenant was violated in the author's case.
In its submission dated 29 July 1997, Greenpeace indicated that it was concerned by the slow pace of ratification of the 1995 Fish Stocks Agreement.
In its submission dated 3 January 2013, the State party informed the Committee of the measures adopted to give effect to the Committee's Views.
In its submission, dated 20 May 1998, concerning the merits of the case, the State party reiterates its request that the complaint should be declared inadmissible.
In its submission dated 16 February 1993, the State party maintains that the communication is inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.
In its submission dated 30 May 1996, the State party contends that the communication should be declared inadmissible on account of abuse of the right of submission. .
In its submission dated 22 June 1999, the State party contests the admissibility of this communication on the basis of article 3 and article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
In its submission, dated 22 January 1996, the State party acknowledges that X has exhausted domestic remedies, and does not raise any objections to the admissibility of the communication.
In its submission dated 2 May 2000, the State party contends that the Swedish Immigration Board and the Aliens Appeal Board have ensured a thorough investigation of the author's case.
In its submission dated 20 December 2011, the State party first considers that the author's allegations under articles 7, 18 and 19 are inadmissible due to the failure to exhaust domestic remedies.
In its submission dated September 2001, the State party comments on the new claims of the author arising from the court proceedings with regard to the author's removal from the Roll of Legal Practitioners.
In its submission dated 14 May 1993, the State party elaborates on the extradition process in general, on the Canada-United States extradition relationship and on the specifics of the present case.
In its submission dated 29 July 1997, the United States of America indicated that it was pleased to have played a substantial role in the successful negotiation of the 1995 Fish Stocks Agreement.
In its submission dated 21 January 1997, the Claimant advised that, as of 31 December 1996, the total amount owed to it under the 1989 Contract had reached USD 871,277,316 as a result of the further accrual of interest.
In its submission dated 9 September 1999, the Claimant advised that, as of 31 August 1999, the total amount owed to it under the 1989 Contract had reached USD 1,005,187,846 as a result of the further accrual of interest.
In its submission dated 28 May 1998, Colombia stated that it supported resolution 46/215 and also informed the Secretary-General that it had no vessels flying its flag that were engaged in this type of fishery.
In its submission dated 26 October 1992(received only after the Committee declared the communication admissible), the State party argues that the communication is inadmissible because of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.
In its submission dated 18 August 1997, the Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna welcomed the adoption of the 1995 Fish Stocks Agreement and would take into account relevant international obligations.
In its submission dated 15 October 2007, the State party reiterates the facts as presented by the author and submits that the author's father's guilt was established on the basis of evidence that was obtained during the investigation process and corroborated during the court proceedings.
In its submission dated 27 June 1997, Latvia informed the Secretary-General that all the fishing vessels flying the Latvian flag were required to observe all orders and regulations and therefore none of them used any type of pelagic drift-nets for high seas fishing.
In its submission dated 7 June 2007, Bangladesh had responded that, although attempts would be made to implement the recommendations, it was difficult to quantify at that time the size of any additional CFC phase-out that might be realized through those actions.
In its submission dated 13 March 2012, the State party accepts that a violation of article 14, paragraph 5 of the Covenant occurred in the author's case, in that the author did not have his conviction and sentence reviewed by a higher tribunal as those terms are understood in the Covenant.
In its submission dated 15 March 2013, the State party made additional comments in which it maintained its position that the author's complaints regarding the alleged violations of articles 14(paras. 1 and 2), 15 and 23(a),(b) and(c) are incompatible with the Covenant and are unsubstantiated.
In its submission dated 22 July 1997, the European Union(EU) reported that it and all its member States had signed the 1995 Fish Stocks Agreement by the deadline of 4 December 1996, and that the possibility of its Council taking a decision on the ratification of the Agreement by EU was currently being discussed.
In its submission dated 11 February 1992, the State party argues that the author's claim that he was forced to sign an incriminating statement should be deemed inadmissible, since it pertains to facts and evidence, which are generally for the appellate courts of States parties to evaluate, and not for the Committee.
In its submission dated 7 June 2007, Bangladesh had responded that, although attempts would be made to implement the recommendations, it was difficult to quantify at that time the size of any additional CFC phase-out that might be realized because the Party had only recently begun doing so through its national phase-out plan.