Примеры использования Legitimate struggle of peoples на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
This includes the legitimate struggle of peoples for self-determination.
It also does not reflect the essential distinction between terrorism and the legitimate struggle of peoples for self-determination.
The legitimate struggle of peoples for the right to self-determination cannot be equated with terrorism.
It was important to distinguish terrorism from the legitimate struggle of peoples for self-determination.
It is not fair that the legitimate struggle of peoples to achieve self-determination and independence should be classified as terrorism.
We also believe that we must make a clear distinction between terrorist acts and the legitimate struggle of peoples for self-determination.
However, the legitimate struggle of peoples in defence of their right to independence or self-determination must be distinguished from terrorism.
A comprehensive convention should also draw a clear distinction between terrorism and the legitimate struggle of peoples for self-determination.
Nor should terrorism be confused with the legitimate struggle of peoples under foreign occupation in exercise of their right to self-determination.
At the same time, any definition of terrorism must clearly distinguish between terrorism and the legitimate struggle of peoples for their independence.
The legitimate struggle of peoples for liberation, including armed struggle, was embodied in international law, and must be distinguished clearly from terrorism.
Terrorism must be distinguished from the legitimate struggle of peoples under foreign occupation for self-determination.
Any definition of international terrorism must therefore clearly distinguish between that scourge and the legitimate struggle of peoples for independence.
Any simplistic confusion between terrorism and the legitimate struggle of peoples under colonial domination for their independence must be avoided.
He stressed the importance of reaching agreement on a legal definition of terrorism that distinguished it clearly from the legitimate struggle of peoples against occupation.
His delegation would not compromise on its fundamental belief that the legitimate struggle of peoples under foreign occupation or alien domination did not constitute terrorism.
Other delegations reiterated that a legal definition of terrorism must make an unequivocal distinction between acts of terrorism and the legitimate struggle of peoples for self-determination.
We differentiate between terrorism and the legitimate struggle of peoples against foreign occupation and for self-determination and national liberation, which cannot be considered terrorism.
Any definition must take into account the need to differentiate between terrorism and the legitimate struggle of peoples for their territorial integrity and liberation.
Terrorism should not be equated with the legitimate struggle of peoples under colonial or alien domination and foreign occupation for self-determination and national liberation.
Some delegations underlined the importance of distinguishing between acts of terrorism and the legitimate struggle of peoples in the exercise of their right to self-determination.
Terrorism must not be confused with the legitimate struggle of peoples under foreign or colonial domination or foreign occupation to achieve self-determination and national liberation.
In condemning terrorism, we should also condemn any attempt to blur the distinction between terrorism and the legitimate struggle of peoples under colonial rule or foreign occupation.
It was thus essential to distinguish terrorism from the legitimate struggle of peoples for liberation, a right which should be universally defended through adoption of the necessary measures.
However, it was important to draw a distinction between terrorism,which was a crime punishable by law, and the legitimate struggle of peoples against all forms of foreign occupation.
A distinction must be drawn between terrorism and the legitimate struggle of peoples against colonial domination and foreign occupation, and for the right of self-determination.
We reiterate our support for the prompt convening of an international conference to define terrorism and to distinguish between it and the legitimate struggle of peoples against foreign occupation.
The comprehensive convention should not equate terrorism with the legitimate struggle of peoples for self-determination and self-defence in the face of foreign aggression and occupation.
Several delegations reiterated their views that a comprehensive convention should contain a clear definition of terrorism and distinguish it from the legitimate struggle of peoples against foreign occupation.
Some delegations emphasized that terrorism should not be equated with the legitimate struggle of peoples under colonial or alien domination and foreign occupation for national liberation and self-determination.