Примеры использования Liberalization can на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In the telecommunications sector, privatization and liberalization can greatly strengthen export potential.
Such liberalization can increase the overall propensity to consume and slow down the accumulation of domestic savings.
Nevertheless, the exposure to international trade andcompetition brought about by economic reform and liberalization can be an important source of economic growth, and many success stories show the way.
Liberalization can remove distortions and generate efficiency and welfare gains in the immediate, medium and long terms for all countries.
At the same time,while potential benefits of liberalization can be large, there is no certainty that they will necessarily materialize.
Люди также переводят
Liberalization can remove distortions and generate efficiency and welfare gains in the immediate, medium and long term for all countries.
Taking account of their specific circumstances, liberalization can improve the international competitiveness of developing countries and promote growth.
Liberalization can remove constraints on growth caused by poor macro-management, inefficient public enterprises, high entry costs for private enterprises and restrictions on FDI.
However, civil society organizations have argued that the flexibility of labour that often follows liberalization can lead to the loss of formal contracts, social security and other social benefits.11.
A strategic approach to liberalization can also limit the severity of labour market adjustment and job losses, especially where import-competing industries exhibit high labour intensity.
While liberalization is generally seen as benefiting small and medium-sized enterprises,which tend to be labour-intensive, liberalization can also pose threats to such enterprises by exposing them to competition from large, capital-intensive transnational corporations.
The full benefits of globalization and liberalization can materialize only if women are able to participate effectively in economic, social and political development.
As we have learned in the past few years,even simultaneous democratization and economic liberalization can exact high social costs, while economic hardships can weaken trust in the viability of democratic institutions.
Benefits from expanding trade through trade liberalization can include increased investment, trade-related fiscal revenues, and employment and income growth.
It is logical because these are two relatively homogenous regions(economically, socially,legally) and the liberalization can go pretty fast and painless, unlike cooperation with corrupt countries like Russia, where laws and business customs are completely different.
Privatization/private sector participation and liberalization can offer useful tools to enhance UA, particularly in situations where government financing is scarce.
Although some level of macroeconomic stability and macro-institutional reform is desirable before initiatives for theliberalization of services take place, services liberalization can also be important in solidifying reform, including in non-services sectors, in enhancing the credibility of government policy and in improving the chances that reform will lead to long-lasting macroeconomic stability and growth.
The first of those worries is just old IS again, and while liberalization can lead to the loss of some protected manufacturing, the evidence of deindustrialization, still less of deleterious deindustrialization is not great.
However, when we examine more closely how these diverse conditions are to be delivered by the State,it is clear that hasty liberalization can constrain the State in many ways by leaving it with a much smaller basket of revenues with which to address a vast social agenda and also by opening it to dangers, as recently witnessed.
Pressures for such"policy harmonization" also arise from concerns that globalization and liberalization can lead to the erosion of social welfare programmes, resulting from the increased ability of private enterprises to seek to locate in those jurisdictions where they find the regulatory and fiscal structure less constraining.
Another sector where liberalization could bear fruit very quickly is the area of housing.
Excessive liberalization could lead to dislocation of local firms and farms.
Liberalization could lead to crowding out small stores with potential for severe social impact.
Concern was expressed that liberalization could aggravate balance-of-payments positions for developing countries.
Without addressing the effects of subsidies,further liberalization could expose DCs to unfair competition.
Estimates suggest that, for developing countries alone, liberalization could provide up to US$ 6 trillion in additional income.
While the round could reduce distortion, liberalization could lead to greater vulnerability, particularly for net food-importing developing countries, which require specific support measures to encourage supply response.
While globalization and liberalization could usher in a brighter future, they could also have undesirable effects, especially on countries which had not achieved the desired levels of development.
Liberalization could be seen as a success story when looking at China and India, which had shown that opening markets could serve poverty alleviation.
Financial liberalization could therefore be doubly damaging, causing both increased poverty and the reduced capacity of Governments to ease the suffering of the poor.