Примеры использования Memorialization processes на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Memorialization processes.
Panel discussion on history teaching and memorialization processes.
When should memorialization processes start and for how long should they continue?
National experiences in the area of history teaching and memorialization processes.
Memorialization processes should be centred on the victims and designed to empower them;
Mr. De Greiff pointed out the gap between theory andpractice in the area of history teaching and memorialization processes.
The rising trend of memorialization processes today makes discussing these issues both urgent and necessary.
Hence, artists, especially those commissioned to work on monuments,may be significant actors in memorialization processes.
Memorialization processes are emotional by definition, while the aim of history teaching should be critical thinking.
Civil and political rights are the human rights mostly referred to in the development of transitional justice policies and memorialization processes.
Some memorialization processes do promote a plurality of narratives within the same monument or history museum.
Finally, the panellists encouraged the Human Rights Council to continue to address the issue of history teaching and memorialization processes in its future work.
Some delegations mentioned that memorialization processes could result in deeper social problems if not carried out adequately.
Delegates expressed their appreciation for the organization of the panel discussion, which represented a favourable context for sharing experiences andgood practices in the area of history teaching and memorialization processes.
Memorialization processes that only identify one group as victims while obliterating serious crimes committed against other parties in the conflict are of concern.
States and other stakeholders should refrain from using memorialization processes to further their own political agendas and ensure that memorial policies contribute to, in particular.
Memorialization processes can promote a culture of democratic engagement by stimulating discussion regarding the representation of the past and contemporary challenges of exclusion and violence.
In any event, when State authorities are unwilling to initiate memorialization processes, such processes do nonetheless commence, initiated by civil society or victims, but also by conflicting parties.
In memorialization processes, some actors may use the battlefield of memory to further their own agendas, imposing definitions of perpetrators and heroes and establishing categories of victims.
However, they should neither engage in norsupport policies of denial that prevent the construction of memorials or memorialization processes, nor should they build, support or finance works that may incite violence.
Ensure the transparency of memorialization processes and promote civil society participation at all stages, including in the decision-making process leading to the memorials.
This is the case of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, where curators consciously seek to be facilitators of memory rather than repositories of memorabilia,allowing memorialization processes to take place, including through cultural expressions and spiritual rituals.
The goals assigned to memorialization processes are thus multi-faceted and, regardless of diversity in form and shape, memorials have both private/reflective and public/educative purposes.
She noted that education policies relating to history teaching failed to acknowledge cultural diversity andthe multiplicity of historical narratives between and within communities, and that memorialization processes could constitute an obstacle to reconciliation, paving the way for revenge in the future.
In the report, the Special Rapporteur addresses memorialization processes of the events of the past in post-conflict and divided societies, with a specific focus on memorials and museums of history/memory.
Such issues may be particularly controversial in societies which have seen international or internal conflicts; post-colonial societies, including those which have experienced slavery; societies challenged by divisions based on ethnic, national or linguistic backgrounds, religion or political ideology; and societies in which indigenous peoples, minorities orother groups have been excluded from the memorialization processes.
It is crucial that memorialization processes do not function as empty rhetoric commemorating the dead, while losing sight of the reasons and the context for past tragedies and obscuring contemporary challenges.
The Special Rapporteur recommends that States adopt legislation setting out guidelines regarding memorialization processes, in accordance with international standards and taking into consideration the conclusion and recommendations above.
While memorialization processes mark the recognition of victims, the will to ensure reparation for mass or grave violations of human rights and non-recurrence, they can also amount to memorial tyrannies.
With regards to the conditions andrecommendations for successful memorialization processes and history teaching activities, it was observed that freedom of expression, including freedom of the press, were regrettably not guaranteed in some countries.