Примеры использования Modularization project на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Lack of sufficient planning for the modularization project.
Governance of the modularization project needs to function more robustly.
Costs for materials and testing in the modularization project;
At the end of June 2013, the modularization project completed the third year of its five-year implementation.
Lack of a single point of accountability for the modularization project.
The intention was to integrate the modularization project into the new supply chain pillar.
The Department was proceeding on schedule with the development of phase one of the modularization project.
The intention was to integrate the modularization project into the new supply chain pillar.
Establish an action plan for the expeditious finalization of the statement of work to avoid further slippage in the implementation of the modularization project.
The Administration has also improved the governance of the modularization project, but we continued to note some deficiencies in project management.
Cases where the envisaged benefits of project implementation were not well justified, in particular,the envisaged savings of $6.8 million through the implementation of the modularization project.
Also, the Department of Field Support is revising the governance structure of the modularization project and expects it to be completed during the first quarter of 2013.
An 18-month delay in the modularization project attributed to delays in finalizing the statement of work for enabling capacity and the associated procurement strategy;
We consider that the Administration needs to further clarify thevision for each pillar, enhance the governance of the modularization project and establish a benefits management strategy for the global field support strategy.
We also consider some critical risks to be missing, for example,the risk of delay in development of statements of work for modularization is not included in the risk framework despite its having led to an 18-month delay in the modularization project.
The Board of Auditors noted that, according to the modularization project's five-year, plan issued in December 2011, the development of a statement of work for enabling capacity was based on service packages.
The Board also noted deficiencies in relation to the Global Service Centre Steering Committee,Regional Service Centre Steering Committee and the governance frameworks for the Transportation and Movements Integrated Control Centre and modularization project.
The Administration revised the governance structure of the modularization project, as previously recommended by the Board, to include twoproject sponsors Director of the Logistics Support Division and Director of the Global Service Centre.
Other governance structures include the Regional Service Centre Steering Committee and the Global Service Centre Steering Committee andthe project governance structure for the Transportation and Movements Integrated Control Centre and modularization project.
In July 2012 two project managers were nominated to oversee execution of the modularization project together, indicating that there was no project manager responsible and accountable for managing the project from April to July 2012.
The modularization project had been delayed by 10 months at the time of audit owing to(i) the lack of a senior responsible owner for the project who is ultimately accountable for its success and benefits delivery; and(ii) delays in finalization of the project's statement of work.
The Committee also observes that the Board of Auditors noted delays in implementation of modularization projects owing to deficiencies in project planning and monitoring of project progress against the timeline of the modularization programme see A/67/5 Vol.
Ineffective functioning of project governance mechanisms was noted at both the Headquarters and pillar levels, such as the Global Field Support Strategy Steering Committee and Client Board,the Global Service Centre Steering Committee and governance of the modularization project.
Improve coordination across the modularization project, especially between the Global Service Centre, the Logistics Support Division of the Department of Field Support and the Procurement Division; andstrengthen the functioning of the revised modularization project governance;
Improve the functioning of the Global Field Support Strategy Steering Committee, the Client Board and the Global Service Centre Steering Committee to ensure more transparent and effective decision-making; and review andrevise the current governance structure of the modularization project to establish single-point accountability for the project's success and benefits delivery;
The responsibility of the design,review and implementation of the modularization project rests with the Global Service Centre. The end-state vision and key performance indicators to be achieved by 30 June 2015 have been formulated, and the review of the pilot modules and the composition of the strategic deployment stocks has been completed.
The Administration agreed with the Board's recommendation that it(a) ensure that the Global Field Support Strategy Steering Committee and Client Board and the Global Service Centre Steering Committee need to consider how they function to improve the transparency and effectiveness of decision-making; and(b) review andrevise the current governance structure of the modularization project to ensure single accountability for the project's success and the timely delivery of the envisaged benefits.
The Board noted that the modularization project has two project sponsors Director of the Logistics Support Division in the Department of Field Support and Director of the Global Service Centre and two project managers one at the Logistics Support Division responsible for development of the statement of work and the other at the Global Service Centre responsible for designing of modules.
To make the working process more convenient, we moved towards project modularization.
For a significant and complex project such as modularization, we would expect detailed and rigorous planning prior to the project starting, but this has not been the case.