Примеры использования Need not address на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Commission need not address each of these many theories in turn.
In the absence of any contrary guidance from the Assembly,the Secretariat assumes that the present report need not address these proposals further.
In light of this conclusion, the Committee need not address the remaining arguments of the State party.
Consequently, the Committee need not address the broader issue of what legislative and administrative measures a State party must take in order to secure that all citizens may meaningfully exercise their right of political participation under article 25 of the Covenant.
In the light of this finding, the Committee need not address any issues that may arise under article 26.
The Committee thus need not address the argument that the petitioner did not also appeal the adverse decisions in certain other cases, though the Committee would note that there is nothing to suggest that the Ministry's decision of lack of standing would have been any different in those cases.
In the light of the conclusions reached above, the Committee need not address the State party's additional arguments against the admissibility of the communication.
The Committee need not address the question of whether the Judicial Committee may consider petitions for special leave to appeal in the absence of a written judgement from the Court of Appeal of Jamaica, because the author's petition, dismissed on 20 February 1991, had in fact been accompanied by said judgement.
However, we dissent in respect of paragraph 5.3 of the Views where the Committee concluded that it need not address the author's other claims related to article 6.
The Committee therefore need not address the issue of the State party's reservation concerning article 26.
It was stated that such an approach would inadvertently result in the conclusion that a State need not address a matter both in the law and in the regulations or other text.
In the light of the foregoing, the Committee need not address the question of whether the State party's reservation regarding article 26 of the Covenant applies in the present case.
While the wording of the decision of 28 October 1992 would not have precluded counsel from introducing them at this stage of the procedure, the Committee, in the circumstances of the case,finds that it need not address the new claims, as domestic remedies before the Canadian courts were not exhausted in respect of them.
In the light of the above, the Committee need not address the other inadmissibility grounds that have been adduced by the State party.
While the author has made an allegation under article 10, paragraph 1, in respect of his treatment the Committee need not address this claim in the light of its finding under article 7 in paragraph 6.2 above.
In the light of this finding, the Committee need not address the question whether the author's conviction also violated his rights under articles 18, paragraph 1, and 19 of the Covenant.
In the light of the above finding of a violation of article 6 of the Covenant,the Committee need not address the authors' remaining claims which all concern the imposition of capital punishment in their case.
In the circumstances, the Committee need not address other admissibility criteria, such as whether the authors have substantiated their claim for purposes of article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
In the light of this conclusion of inadmissibility under article 2 of the Optional Protocol,the Committee need not address other admissibility conditions, including the issue whether the Committee is precluded ratione temporis, from considering some of the author's claims.
In light of the conclusion reached above, the Committee need not address the issue whether the reservation by the State party to article 5, paragraph 2, of the Optional Protocol precludes the examination of the communication by the Committee due to being the same matter that the European Court of Human Rights declared inadmissible on 12 January 2001.
In light of the above finding of a violation of article 6 of the Covenant, the Committee need not address the author's remaining claims under paragraphs 1, 2 and 6 of article 6, which all concern the imposition of capital punishment in this case.
In these circumstances, the Committee need not address the issue of applicability of part(c) of the State party's reservation related to article 26.
In the light of the Committee's foregoing conclusions, the Committee need not address the various remaining arguments on admissibility presented by the author and responded to by the State party.
In view of the commutation of Mr. Graham's death sentence,the Committee need not address counsel's argument that the execution of the death sentence would constitute a violation of article 6 of the Covenant.
As the entire claim has been disallowed on evidentiary grounds,the Panel need not address the issue of whether the loss claimed is a direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait or related to the trade embargo.
In the light of these findings, the Committee need not address the further claim under article 2 alleging a failure of the domestic courts to provide him with an effective remedy for the violations in question.
In the light of the conclusions reached above, the Committee need not address the State party's arguments related to article 5, paragraph 2(a) of the Optional Protocol and the possible application of the State party's reservation to that provision.
Equipment(may be limited to needs not addressed through partnership programmes), including.
In view of this finding under article 19, paragraph 2, of the Covenant,the Committee need not separately address the author's claim under article 9, paragraph 1.
I don't need an address.