Примеры использования Not to be bound на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Right of the author of a valid reservation not to be bound by the treaty without the benefit of its reservation.
Specifically, it argued that article 9(2)required that the parties expressly agree not to be bound by customary usage.
A Declarations not to be bound by Part II(Formation of Contracts, arts. 14-24) or Part III Sale of Goods, arts. 25-88.
It had been the practice in Sierra Leone for incoming Governments not to be bound by commitments undertaken by previous Governments.
Therefore, Japan has reserved the right not to be bound by the provision“in particular by the progressive introduction of free education” as stipulated in article 13, paragraph 2(b) and(c), of the Covenant.
Люди также переводят
Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2,the author of the invalid reservation may express at any time its intention not to be bound by the treaty without the benefit of the reservation.
For this and other reasons,Japan reserves the right not to be bound by the provision"in particular by the progressive introduction of free education" as stipulated in Article 13.2(b) and(c) of the Covenant.
I would therefore take this opportunity to announce that while in principle we remain committed to the Lomé Peace agreement,we reserve the right not to be bound by all its provisions.
It was important for the Secretary-General of UNCTAD to be autonomous and not to be bound by political considerations in carrying out analytical research.
Russia claims not to be bound by any of its previous obligations and commitments in respect of Ukraine, including the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, on the grounds that it does not regard the new Government in Ukraine as legitimate.
Paragraph 3 provided that a State could express"at any time" its intention not to be bound by a treaty if its reservations were considered invalid.
Due to the prohibition of the labour dispute action referred to in Article 8, which is not consistent with the relevant acts and regulations of Japan,Japan reserves the right not to be bound by the said provisions.
During a situation of internal unrest, one party to the conflict claims not to be bound by the obligations contracted by the State against which it is fighting.
The Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples had recommended that the Government should be required to provide a written explanation of any decision not to be bound by the Tribunal's recommendations.
For this and other reasons,Japan reserves the right not to be bound by the provision"in particular by the progressive introduction of free education" as stipulated in Article 13.2(b) and(c) of the Covenant.
Paragraph 3 goes even further in softening the strength of the presumption by providing that the author of an invalid reservation"may express at any time its intention not to be bound by the treaty without the benefit of the reservation.
While States should have the right to express their intention not to be bound by a treaty without the benefit of a reservation that was compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty, they should not have that right if the reservation was invalid.
In applying the provisions of paragraph(d) of Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, andCultural Rights, Japan reserves the right not to be bound by"remuneration for public holidays" referred to in the said provisions.
In his delegation's view,the intention not to be bound by a treaty should be expressed in immediate connection with the reservation. If it was not, then the reserving State or organization should be bound by the treaty without the benefit of its reservation.
A State may consider that the reservation affects other treaty provisions and accordingly,decide not to be bound not only by the provision objecting to the reservation, but also by these other provisions.
Our withdrawal from these instruments might be another pretext for the forces hostile to us to isolate and stifle the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, but for our part,it will be rather convenient not to be bound by these instruments.
However, further thought should be given to where to place the greater stress,whether on the State's desire not to be bound by the treaty without the benefit of its reservation or on its intent to become a party to the treaty.
Concerning the legal consequences of invalid reservations, the 1969 and 1986 Vienna Conventions reflected a compromise between the desirability of maintaining in force all provisions of a treaty not affected by the reservation andthe right of the objecting State not to be bound by a reservation against its will.
Uncertainty was also introduced by new paragraph 4,which allowed the reserving State to express its wish not to be bound by the treaty after a treaty monitoring body had assessed the invalidity of a given reservation.
Japan thus reserves the right not to be bound by the provision of subparagraph(d) of paragraph 1 of Article 8, except in relation to the sectors in which the right referred to in the said provision is accorded in accordance with the laws and regulations of Japan at the time of ratification of said Covenant by the Government of Japan.
The newly added paragraph 3 of guideline 4.5.3,which stipulated that the author of the invalid reservation might express at any time its intention not to be bound by the treaty without the benefit of the reservation, went too far in protecting the author's interests.
Allowing the author of a reservation to express its intention not to be bound by the treaty at any time would pose a considerable risk to the stability of treaty relations, since the other parties would never be sure whether or not the reserving State or organization had become a party.
In applying the provisions of sub-paragraphs(b) and(c) of paragraph 2 of Article 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, andCultural Rights, Japan reserves the right not to be bound by"in particular by the progressive introduction of free education" referred to in the said provisions.
Japan reserves the right not to be bound by the provisions of subparagraph(d) of paragraph 1 of article 8 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, except in relation to the sectors in which the right referred to in the said provisions is accorded in accordance with the laws and regulations of Japan at the time of ratification of the Covenant by the Government of Japan.
Furthermore, paragraph 3 of guideline 4.5.3,by stating that the reserving State could express at any time its intention not to be bound by the treaty without the benefit of the reservation, introduced legal uncertainty, as it was not clear when that intention would produce its effects.