Примеры использования Obligation breached на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The obligation breached is owed to it individually; or.
Articles 16 and 17 should not require that the obligation breached be binding on the assisting State. Israel.
The obligation breached is owed to the international community as a whole.
The question therefore arose as to how to proceed if the obligation breached was aimed at safeguarding the fundamental interests of every State.
The obligation breached is owed to the international community as a whole.
A State is entitled as an injured State to invoke the responsibility of another State if the obligation breached is owed to.
If only the member State had assumed the obligation breached by the measure taken by the organization, the organization could not be held responsible.
A State is entitled as an injured State to invoke the responsibility of another State as provided in Part Two if the obligation breached is owed.
If only the member State had assumed the obligation breached by the measure taken by the organization, the organization could not be held responsible.
The legal consequences of an internationally wrongful act under this Part do not affect the continued duty of the responsible State to perform the obligation breached.
The obligation breached is owed to a group of States including that State, and is established for the protection of a collective interest;
Under the present draft articles, a State is entitled as an injured State to invoke the responsibility of another State if the obligation breached is owed to.
The wording of paragraph 1 does not imply that the obligation breached should necessarily be owed to a group comprising States and international organizations.
A State or an international organization is entitled as an injured party to invoke the responsibility of another international organization if the obligation breached is owed to.
She welcomed, however,the inclusion in the draft of a provision that the obligation breached must be among the functions of the international organization invoking responsibility.
This restricts the entitlement to make a claim to those international organizations which have the function to safeguard"the interest of the international community underlying the obligation breached.
It is required that"safeguarding the interest of the international community underlying the obligation breached be included among the functions of the international organization invoking responsibility.
Such countermeasures involved suspension of performanceof obligations towards the responsible State"if such obligations correspond to, or are directly connected with, the obligation breached.
Article 49 dealing with"States other than the injured State" entitles such States to invoke responsibility if the obligation breached is owed to a group of States or to the international community as a whole.
A State or an international organization is entitled as an injured State oran injured international organization to invoke the responsibility of another international organization if the obligation breached is owed to.
If we totally rely on the types of obligation breached to determine a State's status either as an injured State or as an interested State, it would be better to have obligations of a similar nature defined in one article.
Moreover, article 48 of those articles permits a State other than the injured State to invoke the responsibility of another State if the obligation breached is owed to the international community as a whole.
In that respect,it should be noted that article 43(b)(ii) provided that if an obligation breached was"of such a character as to affect the enjoyment of the rights or the performance of the obligations of all the States concerned", the State concerned could claim injured status.
Any State other than an injured State is entitled to invoke the responsibility of an international organization in accordance with paragraph 4 if the obligation breached is owed to the international community as a whole.
Some States gave, at least tentatively, an unqualified positive answer,while other States indicated that the organization invoking responsibility had to be given the mandate to protect the general interest underlying the obligation breached.
It concerns the invocation of responsibility of an international organization by a State or another international organization which,although it is owed the obligation breached, cannot be regarded as injured within the meaning of article 42 of the present articles.
Likewise the distinction inprinciple between"injured States"(article 43) and other States with a legal interest in the obligation breached(article 49) received general support, even if the formulation of the articles requires further attention.
Chapter I, article 48,recognizes the right of a State other than the injured State to invoke responsibility of another State that has breached an international obligation if"(b) The obligation breached is owed to the international community as a whole.
The Commission's commentary explaining draft article 46(A/63/10, para. 165)did not appear to include the case where the obligation breached by an international organization was owed to the"international community as a whole", in other words, the case of erga omnes obligations. .
In particular, she believed that countermeasures should not be limited to non-performance of a reciprocal obligation, andthat States should be entitled to suspend the performance of an obligation unrelated to the obligation breached, provided that the principles of reversibility and proportionality were met.