Примеры использования Ozonedepleting substances data на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In correspondence dated 13 November 2006, Malta had submitted its outstanding 2005 ozonedepleting substances data.
The Party had subsequently submitted its ozonedepleting substances data for 2006, reporting consumption of zero ODP-tonnes of CFCs, consistent with its commitment contained in decision XVII/26.
In correspondence dated 27 February 2007, Uzbekistan had submitted its outstanding 2005 ozonedepleting substances data.
By the time of the current meeting the Islamic Republic of Iran had submitted its ozonedepleting substances data for 2007, reporting consumption of zero ODPtonnes of carbon tetrachloride.
In later correspondence dated 6 March 2007, Venezuela had submitted its outstanding 2005 ozonedepleting substances data.
In correspondence dated 27 March 2007, Côte d'Ivoire had submitted its outstanding 2005 ozonedepleting substances data, which indicated that the Party was in compliance with the Protocol's control measures in 2005.
The Democratic Republic of the Congo had therefore been included as one of the Parties listed in the draft block recommendation on Parties that were the subject of a decision of the Meeting of the Parties to limit their consumption or production of particular ozone-depleting substances in 2006 to levels specified in those decisions buthad not reported their ozonedepleting substances data for the year 2006.
Recommendation 36/37 had urged Pakistan to submit its 2005 ozonedepleting substances data by 30 September 2006.
The three Parties had subsequently submitted their ozonedepleting substances data for 2006 to the Secretariat, confirming their implementation of their obligations in relation to the control measures of the Montreal Protocol for that year.
By the time of the current meeting, however, the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya had not submitted its ozonedepleting substances data for 2006.
By the time of the current meeting Bosnia andHerzegovina had submitted its ozonedepleting substances data for 2006, reporting CFC consumption of 32.6 ODP-tonnes and zero consumption of methyl bromide and methyl chloroform.
Recommendation 36/6 had urged Bolivia to submit to the Secretariat by 30 September 2006 its ozonedepleting substances data for the year 2005.
By the time of the current meeting the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya had submitted its ozonedepleting substances data for 2007, reporting consumption of 57.50 ODP-tonnes of CFCs, 291.50 ODP-tonnes of halons and 67.60 ODPtonnes of methyl bromide.
The Committee therefore agreed to note with appreciation that Tuvalu, United Arab Emirates and Vanuatu, in accordance with decision XIX/25 and recommendation 40/2,had reported their ozonedepleting substances data for the year 2006 in accordance with Article 7 of the Montreal Protocol.
Solomon Islands andTonga have since submitted their ozonedepleting substances data for 2007 to the Secretariat, confirming their implementation of their obligations in relation to the control measures of the Montreal Protocol for that year.
Recalling the data report contained in documents UNEP/OzL. Pro/18/9 UNEP/OzL. Pro/ImpCom/37/2 andAdd.1, the Committee agreed to include in the draft decision contained in section P of annex I to the present report those Parties that had not submitted their ozonedepleting substances data for 2005 in accordance with Article 7 of the Montreal Protocol prior to the adoption of the draft decision by the Eighteenth Meeting of the Parties.
In subsequent correspondence dated 12 October 2006 the Party had submitted revised ozonedepleting substances data for 2005, indicating that it had consumed zero ODPtonnes of carbon tetrachloride and methyl chloroform, placing it in compliance with the Protocol's control measures for those substances in 2005.
The Committee therefore agreed to forward for consideration by the Twenty-Second Meeting of the Parties the draft decision contained in section B of annex I to the present report, which would among other things record andnote with appreciation the number of parties that had reported ozonedepleting substances data for the year 2009 and list the parties that were in non-compliance with their data-reporting obligations under the Montreal Protocol.
The Implementation Committee at its thirty-seventh meeting had reviewed the 2005 ozonedepleting substances data report of Bolivia, which indicated consumption by the Party of 0.11 ODPtonnes of the Annex B, group II, controlled substance(carbon tetrachloride) in 2005.
The Committee therefore agreed to forward for consideration by the Twenty-Third Meeting of the Parties the draft decision contained in section A of annex I to the present report, which would among other things record andnote with appreciation the number of parties that had reported ozonedepleting substances data for the year 2010 and list the parties that were in non-compliance with their data-reporting obligations under the Montreal Protocol.
By the time of the current meeting, the Federated States of Micronesia had submitted its ozonedepleting substances data for the year 2005, reporting CFC consumption of 0.380 ODP-tonnes, in advance of its commitment contained in decision XVII/32 and returning the Party to compliance with its CFC phaseout obligations under the Protocol.
The Committee therefore agreed to note with appreciation that,in the light of the guidance provided by the Eighteenth Meeting of the Parties that the Secretariat should report and review ozonedepleting substances data submitted by the Parties to one decimal place only, it was confirmed that China was in compliance with the Protocol's control measures in 2004.
By the time of the current meeting, the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya had submitted its 2005 ozonedepleting substances data, reporting CFC consumption of 252.000 ODP-tonnes, halon consumption of 714.500 ODP-tonnes and methyl bromide consumption of 96.000 ODP-tonnes, which were consistent with the Party's commitments contained in decisions XV/36 and XVII/37 and, in the case of CFCs, in advance of its commitment contained in decision XV/36.
By the time of the current meeting, however, the Party had submitted its outstanding data for the year 2004,as well as its ozonedepleting substances data for the year 2005, which showed it to be in compliance with the control measures of the Protocol in both years.
Recommendation 36/8 had urged Botswana to submit to the Secretariat no later than 30 September 2006 its ozonedepleting substance data for the year 2005.
By recommendation 40/2 the Committee had requested the Party to submit its outstanding ozonedepleting substance data for 2006 in accordance with Article 7 of the Montreal Protocol.
Recommendation 36/21 had urged Honduras to submit its 2005 its ozonedepleting substance data by 30 September 2006.
Noting with concern, however, that Saudi Arabia has not yet reported its ozonedepleting substance data for 2008.
Recommendation 36/31 had noted that the Party had not submitted its ozonedepleting substance data for the year 2004 in accordance with decision XVII/20 and had requested the Party to do so by 16 August 2006.
The Committee therefore agreed to note with appreciation that Tuvalu had reported its ozonedepleting substance data for 2003 and 2004, in accordance with recommendation 34/44, and that the Party was in compliance with the Protocol's control measures in those years.