Примеры использования Party also submits на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The State party also submits that the author has failed to exhaust domestic remedies.
The State party also submits that the author failed to appeal the prosecutorial decree of 10 October 2001.
The State party also submits that the author had lodged an application with the European Court of Human Rights.
The State party also submits that in Kazakhstan, ratified international treaties have priority over domestic legislation.
The State party also submits that the author could have sought a humanitarian and compassionate assessment of his case.
The State party also submits that the Board's doubts about the complainant's arrest and mistreatment in 1995 are well-founded.
The State party also submits that only the issue of equalization of pensions has been settled so far in conjunction with the divorce.
The State party also submits that Mr. Kovalev had not exhausted domestic remedies, as required under the Optional Protocol.
The State party also submits that objective evidence does not corroborate the complainant's allegations with regard to the human right situation in India.
The State party also submits that a large part of the author's comments discuss the relationship between international law and Australia's domestic law.
The State party also submits that the complainant has failed to exhaust the domestic remedies available and that he has not diligently pursued the availed remedies.
The State party also submits that the authors are not precluded from bringing the statute of Civil Alternative in line with the requirements of the law and reapplying for registration.
The State party also submits that, in 2010, the complainant entered into correspondence with the European Court of Human Rights in connection with his detention in the Tolyatti temporary confinement ward.
The State party also submits that three of the extradited persons were convicted and given punishments that do not include imprisonment; the criminal case against one of them was closed based on an amnesty.
The State party also submits that the communication violates the spirit of the Convention because her claims are not relevant to the definition of discrimination against women as contained in article 1 of the Convention.
The State party also submits that the complainant's case was reviewed under the PRRA programme, which is founded in Canada's domestic and international commitments to the principle of non-refoulement.
The State party also submits that, in June 2008, when the authors were under a temporary judicial stay of removal and made a new application, their application could not be processed without the payment of fees.
The State party also submits that employers who employ persons with disabilities are obliged to guarantee security and health protection and a barrier-free working environment which must be accessible and useable without external assistance.
The State party also submits that, after the Public Prosecutor dropped the charges against Mustafa Goekce, Şahide Goekce would have been free to bring an action, known as"associated prosecution"(Subsidiaranklage), against her husband.
The State party also submits that, in view of their limited resources, the Ethiopian authorities are focusing their attention on individuals whose activities go beyond the"usual behaviour," or who exercise a particular function or activity that could pose a threat to the Ethiopian regime.
The State party also submits that its Criminal Code as amended prohibits acts of torture committed by officials, such as peace officers, public officers or persons acting at the instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of such persons.
The State party also submits that chapter 12, section 1, of the Act was adopted to ensure compliance with article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides a stronger protection against refoulement than article 3 of the Convention against Torture.
The State party also submits that the testimony of the author's father did not corroborate her claim that her contacts with her family had been restricted by her husband, while the testimony of her children showed that they were not afraid of their father, thus indicating that he had not abused them.
The State party also submits that Mr. Umarov will be allowed to meet with his lawyers if he personally files a written request to the administration of the colony, in accordance with article 10 of the Criminal Correctional Code of Uzbekistan and that the rights of convicts, including Mr. Umarov's, are ensured in accordance with the existing legislation.
The State party also submits a copy of its response to the Committee on the Rights of the Child, in which it submits that re-instating access now, on the basis of the Committee's Views alone, which were adopted without any knowledge of the views of the child or her adoptive parents may be in contravention of article 3(1) and 12(2) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
On 8 October 2013, the State party also submitted its observations on the merits.
The Party also submitted a draft of the proposed components of the legislation to the Secretariat for comment.
Furthermore, the State party also submitted that it assessed and rejected"the author's argument that the State party recognizes only political persecution against men" para. 6.4.
The party also submitted a copy of its 2010 HCFC survey report prepared with the assistance of the United Nations Environment Programme.
Thirty-three Parties also submitted their standard electronic format(SEF) tables for the period from 1 January to 31 December 2008 in 2009.