Примеры использования Party not to expel на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Committee asked the State party not to expel the complainant.
The Committee asked the State party not to expel the author and his family while their communication is under consideration.
On 19 August 2010, in application of rule 108, paragraph 1, of its rules of procedure, the Committee asked the State party not to expel the complainant to Sri Lanka while her complaint was being considered.
The Committee asked the State party not to expel the complainant to the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Pursuant to rule 97 of the Committee's rules of procedure, the Committee, acting through its Special Rapporteur on new communications and interim measures,requested the State party not to expel the author while the communication was being examined.
The Committee asked the State party not to expel the complainant to Bangladesh.
While registering the communication on 27 June 2007, and pursuant to rule 108 of its rules of procedures, the Committee, acting through its Special Rapporteur on new communications andinterim measures, requested the State party not to expel the complainant while his case is under consideration.
The Committee requested the State party not to expel the complainants to India.
On 18 November 1997, the Committee, acting through its Special Rapporteur for New Communications, transmitted the communication to the State party for comments andrequested the State party not to expel the author while his communication was under consideration by the Committee.
The Committee asked the State party not to expel the complainant to the Syrian Arab Republic.
On 14 April 1997, the Committee, acting through its Special Rapporteur for New Communications, transmitted the communication to the State party for comments andrequested the State party not to expel the author while his communication was under consideration by the Committee.
On 31 July 2008 the Committee requested the State party not to expel the complainant to Côte d'Ivoire while his complaint was under consideration.
In accordance with rule 108 of its rules of procedure, when the complaint was registered, on 29 November 2010, the Committee, through its Rapporteur on new complaints andinterim measures, requested the State party not to expel the complainant to the Islamic Republic of Iran while his complaint was under consideration.
On 10 January 2002, the Committee, in accordance with rule 108 of its rules of procedure,requested the State party not to expel the complainant, pending the consideration of his case by the Committee. On 11 March 2002, the State party informed the Committee that this request would be complied with.
On 4 September 2009, pursuant to rule 97 of the Committee's rules of procedure, the Committee, acting through its Special Rapporteur on new communications andinterim measures requested the State party not to expel the author and his family while the communication was being examined.
Under rule 108, paragraph 1, of the Committee's rules of procedure, the Committee requested the State party, not to expel the complainants to Turkey while their complaint was under consideration by the Committee.
At the same time the Committee, acting in accordance with rule 108, paragraph 1, of its rules of procedure,requested the State party not to expel the complainants to Syria while their complaint was under consideration.
At the same time, acting under rule 108, paragraph 9, of its rules of procedure,the Committee requested the State party not to expel the petitioner to Algeria while his communication was being considered.
At the same time, acting under rule 108 of its rules of procedure,it requested the State party not to expel the complainant to Mexico while his complaint was being considered.
At the same time, acting under rule 108 of its rules of procedure,the Committee requested the State party not to expel the complainant to Sri Lanka while his complaint was being considered.
At the same time, acting under rule 108 of its rules of procedure,the Committee requested the State party not to expel the complainant to Honduras while his complaint was being considered.
On 24 March 2010, under former rule 108, paragraph 1, of the Committee's rules of procedure, the Committee requested the State party not to expel the complainant to Ethiopia while his complaint was under consideration by the Committee.
Under rule 108, paragraph 1, of the Committee's rules of procedure(CAT/C/3/Rev.4),the Committee requested the State party not to expel the complainant to Bangladesh while his complaint was under consideration by the Committee.
On 14 February 1996, the Committee, acting through its Rapporteur for New Communications,requested the State party not to expel or deport the author to Sudan while his communication was under consideration by the Committee.
At the same time, acting under rule 108, paragraph 9, of its rules of procedure, the Committee requested the State party not to expel the petitioner to the Islamic Republic of Iran while his communication was being considered.
On 22 November 1996, the Committee acting through its Special Rapporteur for New Communications,requested the State party not to expel or deport Z to the then Zaire while her communication was under consideration by the Committee.
On 28 October 2011, in application of rule 114, paragraph 1, of its rules of procedure, the Committee asked the State party not to expel K.N., F.W. and their children to the Islamic Republic of Iran while the complaint was being considered.
On 16 April 2008 under rule 108, paragraph 1,of the Committee's rules of procedure(CAT/C/3/Rev.4), the Committee requested the State party not to expel the complainant to Bangladesh while his complaint was under consideration by the Committee.
On 22 August 1995, the Committee, through its Special Rapporteur, transmitted the communication to the State party for comments andrequested the State party not to expel the author while her communication was under consideration by the Committee.
On 10 February 1995, the Committee, through its Special Rapporteur, transmitted the communication to the State party for comments andrequested the State party not to expel the author while his communication was under consideration by the Committee.