Примеры использования Party not operating на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5.
The Party said that it was originally classified as a Party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5.
No Party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 has expressed similar concerns.
Singapore had initially been classified as a Party not operating under Article 5 of the Protocol but was subsequently reclassified.
The representative of UNDP explained that the GEF Council had approved assistance for Armenia while it had still been classified as a Party not operating under Article 5.
Ukraine, a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol, was considered under agenda items 7 and 11.
To note that the Russian Federation ratified the Montreal Protocol on 10 October 1988 and is classified as a Party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol;
One of the co-chairs from a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 is unlikely to continue to be a member beyond 2013.
Since then, however, more parties had reported and one case of unexplained deviation had been identified,relating to a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5.
The Russian Federation is a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol and is to be considered under agenda item 7.
Aerospace applications Abbreviations: A5, party operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Montreal Protocol;NA5, party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Montreal Protocol; MDI, metered-dose inhaler.
Kazakhstan was a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 and was not a party to the Copenhagen or Beijing Amendment.
In its response of 8 September 2007 Turkmenistan had advised that"after reclassification[as a Party not operating under Article 5 of the Protocol] we started to gather info about the baseline years of 1995 and 1998.
To note that Azerbaijan ratified the Montreal Protocol, London and Copenhagen Amendments on 21 June 1996, and the Montreal Amendment on 28 September 2000, andis classified as a Party not operating under Article 5 of the Protocol.
The Committee also considered the situation of the Russian Federation, a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5, where it was recorded that its accounting did not cover the full exemption.
Noting that Azerbaijan ratified the Montreal Protocol and the London and Copenhagen Amendments on 21 June 1996 and the Montreal Amendment on 28 September 2000 andis classified as a Party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol.
One draft decision concerned exports of HCFCs to Kazakhstan,the only State classified as a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 that was also a State not party to the Copenhagen, Montreal and Beijing Amendments.
Noting that the Russian Federation is a party to the Copenhagen and Beijing amendments to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer andis classified as a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol.
Noting further that Kazakhstan is classified as a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol and has not been determined by the Meeting of the Parties to be in full compliance with the requirements of paragraph 8 of Article 4 of the Protocol.
A maximum sum of $15,000 has been allocated by the Parties for 2005 to cover the travel costs for an MBTOC co-chair from a Party not operating under Article 5 to three meetings related to critical-use nominations.
To remind Turkmenistan that its classification as a Party not operating under Article 5 for 2003 and 2004 required the Committee to review the Party's compliance status in those years by reference to its commitments contained in decision XI/25;
Noting that Belarus ratified the Montreal Protocol on 22 January 1988, the London Amendment on 10 June 1996 and the Copenhagen, Montreal and Beijing Amendments on 13 March 2007 andis classified as a Party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol.
The representative of the Secretariat explained that Kazakhstan, a Party not operating under Article 5, had committed itself, under its plan of action, to phase out consumption of CFCs and methyl bromide by 2004, and to ban imports of ODS-using equipment by 2003.
In the submission of its report on production and consumption of ozone-depleting-substance data for 2009, the Russian Federation had reported the export of 70.2 metric tonnes of HCFCs to Kazakhstan,which was also a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol.
Noting further that Kazakhstan is classified as a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol and has not been determined by a meeting of the parties to be in full compliance with the requirements of paragraph 8 of Article 4 of the Protocol.
The Panel noted that China had expressed concern that it might not be able to meet its needs for this substance,which it deemed critical, but that no Party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 had expressed similar concerns.
Tajikistan, a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5, also requested the revision of its baseline data for HCFC consumption for 1989 from 6.0 ODPtonnes to 18.7 ODPtonnes based on the outcome of a national survey that had revealed additional CFC consumption for 1989.
Noting that Ukraine ratified the Montreal Protocol on 20 September 1988, the London Amendment on 6 February 1997, the Copenhagen Amendment on 4 April 2002 and the Montreal andBeijing amendments on 4 May 2007 and is classified as a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol.
As a Party not operating under Article 5 of the Protocol, the European Community was required to maintain total phaseout of methyl bromide consumption except for consumption for quarantine and pre-shipment applications or consumption in accordance with critical use exemptions granted by the Parties. .
Noting that Kazakhstan ratified the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer on 26 August 1998, the London Amendment on 26 July 2001 and the Copenhagen and Montreal Amendments on 28 June 2011 andis classified as a party not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol.