Примеры использования Proposed framework agreement на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The proposed framework agreement offers what may be the last window of opportunity for years to come.
By protecting existing treaties, such a proviso would attract more potential parties to the proposed framework agreement.
While the discussions on the proposed framework agreement would go on, the settlement plan would not be abandoned, but would be put on hold.
What Morocco has been unable to accomplish by force or through the ballot box might be brought about by implementing the proposed framework agreement.
The proposed framework agreement, if it were put into effect, could make the integration of the Territory of Western Sahara into Morocco an accepted principle.
In their view, by protecting existing treaties,such a proviso would moreover attract more States to become parties to the proposed framework agreement.
The proposed framework agreement is not unlike agreements used to address similar situations elsewhere where a devolution of authority to the inhabitants of a non-self-governing territory is granted with the final status of the territory to be determined by a referendum.
The report specifically recommended an extension of the mandate of MINURSO for five months in order toallow time to initiate negotiations on a proposed framework agreement on the status of Western Sahara.
They called for immediate negotiations on the proposed Framework Agreement on Special and Differential Treatment for developing countries during the course of the present negotiations and reaffirmed that special and differential treatment applies to all developing countries.
On 5 May 2001, my Personal Envoy also met with the Secretary-General of the Frente POLISARIO, Mohamed Abdelaziz, and other members of his party in Tindouf,with whom he reviewed the proposed framework agreement.
The Council was further informed that, on 5 May 2001,the Personal Envoy had presented the proposed framework agreement to Secretary-General Mohamed Abdelaziz of the Frente POLISARIO, who had refused to discuss the proposed document because it did not include independence.
Unfortunately, our observations on the Frente POLISARIO memorandum and Algeria's comments must be limited to the manner in which both of them have failed to meet their international obligations by not addressing the substance of the proposed framework agreement.
He stressed that the proposed framework agreement was not unlike agreements used to address similar situations elsewhere where devolution of authority to the inhabitants of a non-self-governing territory was granted, with the final status to be determined by a referendum.
He also pointed out that the Secretary-General andhis Personal Envoy called upon the parties to engage in constructive consultations on the proposed framework agreement, as it might be the last window of opportunity for years to come.
He stressed that the proposed framework agreement was not unlike agreements used to address similar situations elsewhere where devolution of authority to the inhabitants of a non-self-governing territory was granted with the final status to be determined by a referendum.
For the reasons outlined above, I recommend that the Security Council extend the mandate of MINURSO for five months, until 30 November 2001,to give time to my Personal Envoy to conduct consultations on the proposed framework agreement on the future status of Western Sahara.
It is therefore obvious that the proposed framework agreement, which is silent on the inalienable right of the Saharan people to self-determination, makes a mockery of principles to which the international community is committed, especially the Saharan people's right to freedom of expression through a"free, fair and impartial referendum.
The Secretary-General also recommended the extension of the mandate of the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara(MINURSO)to give his Personal Envoy time to conduct consultations on the proposed framework agreement on the future status of Western Sahara.
Beyond its express provisions, this proposed framework agreement in reality seeks to confer on the occupier the authority of an"administrative power" and unduly opens the door to giving Morocco a putative right to delegate powers it does not have, to the so called"inhabitants of the Territory" of Western Sahara.
President Bouteflika had subsequently addressed letters to the Secretary-General and to his Personal Envoy,along with a memorandum containing Algeria's views on the proposed framework agreement, which were attached to the report of the Secretary-General ibid., annex II, enclosure.
The Council was further informed that, on 5 May 2001,the Personal Envoy had presented the proposed framework agreement to Secretary-General Mohamed Abdelaziz of the Frente POLISARIO, who had indicated that anything other than independence meant integration with Morocco and that he did not want to consider or discuss the framework proposal.
Since they have not agreed, over a period of 10 years, on how to resolve these problems, and made it clear in the above-mentioned consultations that they were not likely to do so,it is logical that the proposed framework agreement would concentrate on an acceptable political solution.
Should the Personal Envoy decide to continue with the discussions about the proposed framework agreement after the five-month period in order to negotiate such changes as would make it acceptable to Morocco, the Frente POLISARIO, Algeria and Mauritania, it would be the Secretary-General's intention to recommend to the Security Council that MINURSO's mandate be extended to permit time for such negotiations.
The Algerian authorities promised to study the document and revert to my Personal Envoy with their comments. On 22 May 2001, President Bouteflika addressed letters to my Personal Envoy and myself,along with a memorandum containing Algeria's comments on the proposed framework agreement see annex II and enclosure.
President Bouteflika had addressed letters to the Secretary-General andto his Personal Envoy along with a memorandum containing Algeria's views on the proposed framework agreement, which were attached to the report of the Secretary-General(ibid., annex II). The Security Council also had the opportunity to review, in the same report, an analysis of that memorandum prepared by the Secretariat ibid., annex III.
Over the next five months, my Personal Envoy will invite Morocco, the Frente POLISARIO, Algeria and Mauritania to engage, as parties, in direct orproximity talks, under his auspices, to discuss the proposed framework agreement and, if possible, to negotiate such changes as would make it acceptable to all of them.
Should the Personal Envoy decide to continue the discussions about the proposed framework agreement after the five-month period in order to negotiate such changes as would make it acceptable to Morocco, the Frente POLISARIO, Algeria and Mauritania, it would be the Secretary-General's intention to recommend to the Security Council that MINURSO's mandate be extended to permit time for such negotiations.
The memorandum recalls Security Council resolutions 1342(2000) and 1349(2001), which expect the parties to work both on resolving the multiple problems relating to the implementation of the settlement plan and on trying to agree on amutually acceptable political solution, and finds that the proposed framework agreement moves substantively away from the approach, which has been endorsed by the two parties and the international community.
The Algerian memorandum makes three points:(a) that the proposed framework agreement favours the notion and, indeed, prepares the ground for eventual integration of Western Sahara with Morocco;(b) that the framework goes against the principle of self-determination; and(c) that the Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General has not followed his mandate, requiring him to work on the"double track", but has focused instead solely on a political solution.
It is therefore my hope and that of my Personal Envoy that Morocco, the Frente POLISARIO, Algeria and Mauritania will agree to meet, as parties, either directly, orthrough proximity talks under the auspices of my Personal Envoy, to discuss with specificity the elements of the proposed framework agreement, which aims at reaching an early, durable and agreed resolution of the conflict over Western Sahara in a way that does not foreclose self-determination, but indeed provides for it.