Примеры использования Proposed scale на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Two countries asked for more time to consider the proposed scale.
In establishing the proposed scale, the Committee had duly taken into consideration General Assembly decision 47/456.
He hoped that the Fifth Committee would be able to endorse the proposed scale.
The Assembly considered the proposed scales of assessment for the contributions of members to the administrative budget of the Authority as recommended by the Council ISBA/4/A/L.7.
However, Mexico had chosen not to block Committee consensus in the recommendation on the proposed scale to the Board.
The proposed scale would adjust automatically to altered economic situations and would continue to take into account the needs of Member States with low per capita income.
Mr. Hanson-Hall(Ghana), speaking on behalf of the Group of 77 and China,said that the proposed scale was based on the principle of capacity to pay.
Ninety-four countries were positive about the indicative scale and 87 of them pledged orpaid close to or above the proposed scale.
The highest point of the proposed scale, GS-7/XII, is 61,144 euros or 82,963 United States dollars at the October 2013 exchange rate of 0.737 euros per United States dollar.
The burden must therefore be distributed among all Members in a just andequitable manner and the proposed scale, unfortunately, did not meet those two criteria.
In preparing the 12 proposed scales, it had decided to use the PAREs or other rates used in calculating the current contributions of States for which rates other than MERs had been used.
Yet the total share of the scale of assessment of the permanent members of the Security Council would fall well below 40 per cent in the proposed scale for 1998-2000.
Decides to accept the Council's recommendations and approves the proposed scale of contributions as modified to reflect the increase in the number of member States, as foreseen in resolution 404(XIII);
Since the last scale of assessments,the Syrian economy had by no means improved sufficiently to justify the increase contained in any of the proposed scales.
The changes proposed by the Committee on Contributions to the methodology which had been used in calculating the proposed scale of assessments for the next three years were a positive step.
In the context of developing a proposed scale for consideration by the SBI, an issue has arisen covering the shares of those Parties which have hitherto been fixed, namely the United States of America and those with a minimum contribution of 0.001 per cent.
Regrettably, the Committee had been unable to reach a wide consensus on the issue of exchange rates; however,the data used in preparing the 12 proposed scales had been the most updated and reliable available.
The national income data used in the preparation of the proposed scale had been provided to the United Nations Statistical Office by Member States and non-member States.
The Committee also recommended that the application of General Assembly resolution 48/223 B, paragraph 2,should be limited to developing countries which currently benefited from the scheme of limits but whose rates in the proposed scale would increase.
The use of information dating back to the period 1993-1998 in calculating the proposed scale caused distortions, since any country's economic situation could change in five years as a result of economic difficulties, natural disasters or man-made problems.
The Executive Director was requested to notify all member States of the proposed indicative scale of contributions and all countries were urged to inform UNEP whether ornot they would use the proposed scale or choose another basis for their contributions.
The Executive Director was requested to notify all Member States of the proposed scale and all countries were urged to inform UNEP whether ornot they would use the proposed scale or choose another basis for their contributions.
The proposed scale of assessments seemed to reflect the capacity to pay of Member States rather better than earlier scales and met, at least in part, the concerns of a number of developing countries and of Central and Eastern European countries with economies in transition.
During the discussions that had taken place, his delegation, in a spirit of compromise,had accepted a number of the points that had been incorporated into the proposed scale; a consensus could only be achieved if all States were willing to relinquish some of their interests in order to solve a global problem.
Conclusion is made, that the use of proposed scale of desirability by Harrington makes possible to estimate degree of efficiency of the process of professional training, as well as opens the possibility to not limiting of quantity and quality of input parameters for assessment of professional competence.
Although section D of the draft resolution envisaged the possibility of reviewing the scale for the years 1999-2000,it was his delegation's understanding that the General Assembly was to adopt the proposed scale, which his delegation had accepted as a package for three years, based on the parameters set forth in section A, paragraph 1, of the draft resolution.
Although the proposed scale of assessments did not fully ensure equity and fairness among Member States, in a spirit of consensus and despite severe financial and economic difficulties in Japan, his delegation would not block a consensus on draft resolution A/C.5/52/L.17.
Approves the proposed scale of contributions for 2016-2017 as modified to reflect the changes in membership and that in the budget, as foreseen in resolution 404(XIII), and which represents 0.0% annual growth in individual country contributions with respect to 2015, except when required by technical changes in the class situation of individual country cases;
The Committee took note of the proposed scale of contributions for 2016-2017 as modified to reflect the changes in membership and that in the budget, as foreseen in resolution 404(XIII), and which represents 0.0% annual growth in individual country contributions with respect to 2015, except when required by technical changes in the class situation of individual country cases.
Recommends the General Assembly to adopt the proposed scale of contributions for 2010-2011 as modified to reflect the increase in the number of Member States and that in the budget, as foreseen in resolution 404(XIII), and which represents zero nominal growth in individual country contributions with respect to 2009, except when required by technical changes in the class situation of individual country cases;