Примеры использования Protection of vmes на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
A range of Conservation measures have been put in place by CCAMLR to address the protection of VMEs.
It was emphasized that ensuring the protection of VMEs should not develop along two different tracks and that all States had a responsibility to implement the resolutions.
A range of Conservation measures have been put in place by CCAMLR to address the protection of VMEs.
Australia indicated that it had provided assistance to CCAMLR in the protection of VMEs and the management of bottom fishing activities in the CCAMLR Convention Area.
The information reported from such encounters would then be scientifically assessed and reviewed by NAFO to determine andadopt any necessary measures for the protection of VMEs.
The regulations would be adapted to national fisheries and aimed at the protection of VMEs from destructive fishing practices.
The information reported from such encounters was then scientifically assessed and reviewed to determine andadopt any necessary measures for the protection of VMEs.
Recent measures adopted in SEAFO to address the protection of VMEs included conservation measure 18/10 on the management of vulnerable deep water habitats and ecosystems.
NAFO reported that resolution 61/105 was a watershed moment in the history of high seas fisheries,as it provided a clear outline for the identification and protection of VMEs.
Following the adoption of resolution 61/105, the European Union adopted Council Regulation(EC) No. 734/2008 on the protection of VMEs in the high seas from the adverse impacts of bottom fishing gears.
In 2008, EC adopted a regulation on the protection of VMEs in the high seas from the adverse impacts of bottom fishing gear, in areas not covered by RFMO/A measures Council Regulation No. 734/2008.
The measure would be binding on all WCPFC members and cooperating non-members andwas expected to have a positive and indirect impact on the sustainable management of fish stocks and the protection of VMEs.
In application of the precautionary approach,it had extended protection of VMEs to surrounding areas, by requiring fishing vessels to move at least five nautical miles from the location of these VMEs. .
In addition, FAO was developing a collection of historical deep-sea fisheries data on the South-East Atlantic, which would serve to support the RFMO andStates in their management of fisheries and protection of VMEs.
The Russian Federation indicated that it had participated actively in the development of measures to regulate deep-sea fisheries and protection of VMEs, within relevant RFMO/As, in accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/105.
Several participants stressed the need for transparency in the actions taken by regional fisheries management organizations and arrangements with respect to conducting impact assessments, identifying VMEs and adopting andimplementing measures to ensure the protection of VMEs.
FFA was of the view that any measures taken for the sustainable use of fish stocks and protection of VMEs should not result in the transfer of a disproportionate burden of conservation action onto developing States.
A number of States(Canada, Cuba, France, Norway, United States) elaborated on their respective frameworks for oceans management, regulation of fisheries andmarine biodiversity with respect to the protection of VMEs from destructive fishing practices.
The European Union reported that theresults of its review of Council Regulation(EC) No. 734/2008 on the protection of VMEs in the high seas from the adverse impacts of bottom fishing gears were published in a report from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council.
The resolution was a watershed moment, as it provided for a road map for the assessment of individual bottom fishing activities,the identification and protection of VMEs, while allowing for responsible fisheries to continue.
The revised interim measures set out the objectives of the sustainable management of fish stocks and the protection of VMEs, and include provisions on geographic scope, management principles, collection of fisheries and scientific information, establishment of a scientific working group, information sharing, and effective control of bottom fishing vessels.
The future RFMO will provide for management of bottom fisheries conducted by vessels operating onthe high seas and sustainable management of fish stocks and protection of VMEs in the high-seas areas of the north-west Pacific Ocean.
Regarding the activities of States,Canada reported that its international governance strategy funded science projects between 2009 and 2011 in support of the identification and protection of VMEs, including the development of guidance and procedures for the identification of VMEs and mapping of VMEs, the development of scientific and technical guidance to identify, describe and assess activities that may have significant adverse impacts on marine biodiversity, and the development of guidance for science-based impact assessments.
More broadly, further efforts are needed to increase cooperation and coordination on data collection and sharing, and for capacity-building andtransfer of appropriate technology to developing States to ensure their participation in deep sea fisheries and the protection of VMEs.
In their contributions,States expressed appreciation for the role of FAO in providing assistance in the management of deep-sea fisheries in the high seas and the protection of VMEs, including through the series of actions outlined in paragraph 89 of the resolution.
The interim measures were to be implemented by participants, in accordance with their laws and regulations, taking into account an ecosystem approach to fisheries management and the precautionary approach, for vessels flying their flag and fishing for non-highly migratory fish species in the high seas of the South Pacific Ocean, in order toachieve the sustainable management of fish stocks and the protection of VMEs of the area.
Some States expressed appreciation for the role of FAO, ordescribed their participation in the work of FAO in the management of deep-sea fisheries in the high seas and the protection of VMEs and in implementing the commitments contained in resolutions 61/105 and 64/72 Canada, Colombia, Denmark, France, New Zealand.
States indicated that the FAO InternationalGuidelines had great importance, as they provided tangible direction to fisheries managers and operators in the protection of VMEs against the effects of fishing, by further detailing key concepts in General Assembly resolution 61/105, such as the definition of"vulnerable marine ecosystem", the components of an"assessment", and examples of mitigation measures.
In paragraph 125 of resolution 64/72, the General Assembly expressed appreciation to FAO for its important work in providing expert technical advice on the management of deep-sea fisheries in areas beyond national jurisdiction and the protection of VMEs from the impacts of fishing and encouraged FAO in its further work in relation to the implementation of the FAO Guidelines.
In paragraph 126 of resolution 64/72, the General Assembly welcomed the FAO programme proposal for deep-sea fisheries in the high seas on ensuring sustainable use of marine resources and protection of VMEs, including the development of support tools and a database on VMEs, and invited States to support the programme so that its elements might be finalized as a matter of priority.