Примеры использования Public legal entities на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Participation of private and public legal entities.
The private and public legal entities acknowledge that dispute settlement arrangements are open to them;
It is important to note that objects of civil rights withdrawn from circulation can only belong to public legal entities 13, p. 2, 18; 31; 32; 33.
Project participants- private and/or public legal entities authorized by a Party to participate in a CDM or JI project activity;
Guidance as to the necessary characteristics of dispute settlement arrangements for addressing claims by private and public legal entities can be found in a number of international legal instruments.
Parties can authorize private and/or public legal entities to participate in these mechanisms see decisions 3/CMP.1, 9/CMP.1 and 11/CMP.1.
In this decision, the COP/MOP should invite Parties, the CDM Executive Board andthe JISC to ensure implementation of such a decision so that all private and public legal entities authorized to participate in the mechanisms comply with this requirement.
Private and public legal entities are thus directly involved in the implementation of the mechanisms and indirectly in treaty compliance.
Actions taken in response to concerns orissues raised by private or public legal entities with regard to project activities under the clean development mechanism.
All private and public legal entities requesting to be listed as project participants in a particular project activity would have to formally consent to these conditions.
The establishment of procedures for settling disputes, complaints andclaims brought by private and public legal entities is therefore a condition for effectively protecting members serving on constituted bodies and ERTs.
Most private and public legal entities with a grievance will contact the Executive Secretary or the member of the constituted body with details of their complaint and seek some remedy.
The Executive Secretary will continue to improve the support and assistance provided to the constituted bodies and the ERTs, and to respond promptly to concerns andissues raised by private or public legal entities participating in the mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol.
That the private and public legal entities agree that decisions of this dispute settlement arrangements shall be final and binding.
For possible law suits against individuals serving on constituted bodies and ERTs in States that are not Parties to the Kyoto Protocol,the Executive Secretary would still rely upon the declaration made by private and public legal entities concerned to use the dispute settlement arrangements established by the COP/MOP.
The absence of formal procedures for private or public legal entities to bring their concerns and have them addressed increases the risk that such entities will raise complaints, contest decisions or seek redress in national courts.
The scope of the assistance provided by the Executive Secretary will depend on whether the dispute or claim has been filed ina national court or has been made at the headquarters of the secretariat pursuant to the declaration by private and public legal entities participating in the mechanisms under Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Kyoto Protocol, in accordance with the decisions of the COP/MOP.
Such disputes, complaints orclaims may be made by private and public legal entities participating in the mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol, or by other affected legal entities that are not participating in the mechanisms.
It contains a summary of actions taken by the secretariat:(1) to minimize the risks of disputes, complaints and claims against individuals serving on constituted bodies established under the Kyoto Protocol; and(2) in response to concerns orissues raised by private or public legal entities involved in the mechanisms established under the Kyoto Protocol.
This is particularly relevant where determinations infringe the rights of private or public legal entities, and the constituted body failed to take all precautionary measures as required by decisions of the COP/MOP in order to avoid such injury;
Private and public legal entities seeking to participate in the mechanisms pursuant to Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Kyoto Protocol could be required to give their formal consent, for example through a declaration, that any disputes, complaints or claims relating to an application for or participation in projects under the mechanisms must be brought in accordance with decisions of the COP/MOP and be made at the headquarters of the secretariat.
If the disputesettlement arrangements are credible, the creation of the body will be welcomed by most private and public legal entities because it would ensure that errors would be subject to a competent remedial process rather than a protracted dispute in a national court against the unanimous wishes of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol.
The implications for private and public legal entities of the activities of constituted bodies and ERTs, as well as the possible disputes, complaints and claims that could be brought by private and public legal entities against individuals serving on constituted bodies.
To ensure efficiency, the secretariat would need to assign dedicated staff and resources to process and manage the preparations and submission of these declarations,as well as to answer questions from private and public legal entities with respect to the agreement, and report to the COP/MOP, the CDM Executive Board and the JISC on the declarations made and those outstanding.
Formal consent ordeclaration from private and public legal entities that claims will be made at the headquarters of the secretariat and in accordance with decisions of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol.
The constitutionally guaranteed right to compensation by the State in the event of unlawful arrest and arrest and sentencing of innocent persons is spelt out in the 1966 Act on the Legal Responsibility of Officials,article 3 of which reads:“public legal entities shall be liable for damage inflicted by them or by persons acting on their behalf in the course of their official duties”.
That private and public legal entities agree that all disputes, complaints and claims against constituted bodies or individuals serving on constituted bodies or ERTs under the Kyoto Protocol shall be made at the headquarters of the secretariat using the dispute settlement arrangements established by the COP/MOP;
Requests the Executive Secretary to take action, including through his good offices, where practicable, especially in response to concerns orissues raised by private or public legal entities involved in the mechanisms established pursuant to Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Kyoto Protocol, to minimize the risks of disputes, complaints and claims against individuals serving on constituted bodies established under the Kyoto Protocol;
That requires private and public legal entities seeking to participate in the mechanisms pursuant to Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Kyoto Protocol to make a formal consent or declaration in writing that any disputes, complaints or claims against the constituted bodies or individuals serving on constituted bodies or ERTs under the Kyoto Protocol will be made in accordance with decisions of the COP/MOP and at the headquarters of the secretariat;
The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol(CMP), by its decision 9/CMP.2, requested the Executive Secretary to take a number of actions, especially in response to concerns andissues raised by private or public legal entities involved in the mechanisms established under the Kyoto Protocol, to minimize the risks of disputes, complaints and claims against individuals serving on constituted bodies established under the Kyoto Protocol.