Примеры использования Referral bench на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Referral Bench granted four transfers and denied one transfer.
The remaining three decisions by the Referral Bench are currently pending appeal.
The Referral Bench has currently disposed of all requests for referral of cases.
The Office of the Prosecutor submits quarterly progress reports to the Tribunal's Referral Bench.
The establishment of a referral bench in response to the prosecution's motions under rule 11 bis.
The decisions on the referral of cases were made by a specially appointed Referral Bench, and, in some cases, appeals were made against them.
So far, the Referral Bench has granted six motions and only three are pending decision.
Of the 22 motions filed since the adoption of the rule on referrals, the Referral Bench has granted nine motions involving 15 Accused.
The rule 11 bis Referral Bench is composed of judges Orie(presiding), Kwon and Parker.
Between 2005 and 2007, eight cases involving thirteen indicted accused were ordered by a special chamber("Referral Bench") to be referred to the competent authorities of three separate national jurisdictions.
The Referral Bench has however refrained from considering this motion until the question of Kovačević's fitness to stand trial has been determined.
The President has also constituted a rule 11 bis Referral Bench comprising Judges Alphonsus Orie, O-gon Kwon and Kevin Parker.
The referral bench denied the request owing to the seniority of the accused and the nature of the crimes committed, therefore not meeting the conditions for transfer set out in Rule 11 bis.
These are currently being considered by the referral bench to determine whether all conditions for transfer have been met.
A Referral Bench composed of Judges Arrey, presiding, Short and Fremr, granted the Prosecutor's application for referral of the case against Jean Uwinkindi to the courts of Rwanda on 28 June 2011.
It is not appropriate to"second guess" whether the Referral Bench will or will not grant any particular pending or future rule 11 bis motion.
Thus far, the International Tribunal has transferred 4 cases involving 8 accused, and6 cases involving 8 accused remain pending at the Referral Bench or Appeals Chamber level.
The decisions on referral of cases were made by a specially appointed Referral Bench, followed by appeals against the referral decisions in some cases.
To date, the Referral Bench has issued decisions to transfer four cases involving eight accused to the national Chamber and a number of other 11 bis transfer motions will be decided in the upcoming months.
The decisions upon referral of cases were made by a specially appointed Referral Bench, followed by appeals against the referral decisions in some cases.
Of the motions filed, the Referral Bench has granted six referrals involving 11 accused. Four referral motions involving five accused are pending.
The Prosecutor moved on 29 November 2004 for referral of the case against Janković to Bosnia and Herzegovina.On 22 July 2005, the Referral Bench granted the transfer of Janković pursuant to rule 11 bis.
In determining whether to refer an indictment, the Referral Bench must consider the gravity of the crimes charged and the level of responsibility of the accused.
In one case involving two accused,the Appeals Chamber overturned the referral of the accused that appealed the referral and directed the Referral Bench to consider whether, in the interests of judicial economy, both cases should be heard by the same judicial body.
The President also assigned a referral Bench under rule 11bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence to decide on the transfer of Michel Bagaragaza to a State, but denied a Defence Motion seeking the assignment of a referral Bench in the case of Édouard Karemera, Mathieu Ngirumpatse and Joseph Nzirorera.
Transfer in four cases(Mejakić et al., Janković, Stanković and the Rasević and Todović cases) has been granted, while transfer in one(the Dragomir Milošević case) has been denied.On 30 June 2005, the Referral Bench granted the Prosecutor's motion to withdraw the request to transfer the indictment against Mile Mrksić et al. to another court.
Under Rule 11 bis,the Prosecution has the authority to request the Referral Bench to revoke its referral order should it determine that such a case is not being conducted in full adherence with human rights norms and due process standards.
After a considerable process of briefing and hearings,on 20 July 2005 the Referral Bench granted the Prosecutor's motion to refer the case to Bosnia and Herzegovina pursuant to rule 11 bis.
On 8 February 2005, the prosecution filed a request with the Referral Bench to refer the case to the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, or to the Republic of Croatia pursuant to rule 11 bis. On 9 June 2005, the Prosecutor moved for withdrawal of its request for referral andon 30 June 2005, the Referral Bench granted the request.
There were no referral decisions during this reporting period; however, the Referral Bench continued to assess the previously referred cases through periodic progress reports submitted by the Prosecutor.