Примеры использования Reparation may на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The ensuing claim to reparation may therefore be limited.
This reparation may take the form of restitution, compensation or satisfaction, either singly or in combination.
Lastly, in clause 6 the previous draft states that reparation may be claimed by“groups of persons connected” with the victim.
Such reparation may be sought before a national court or an international body.
Is without prejudice to any right of recourse that the entity providing reparation may have against the other responsible entities.
The right to reparation may be exercised collectively within the context of appropriate bilateral or inter-State procedures.
The right to access to justice, together with the right to a remedy and reparation may also constitute a domestic means of ensuring the right to the truth.
The required full reparation may take the form of restitution, compensation and satisfaction either singly or in combination.
Are without prejudice to any right of recourse that the State orinternational organization providing reparation may have against the other responsible States or international organizations.
Reparation may take the form of monetary compensation for economically quantifiable damage as well as for non-material damage, depending on the circumstances of the case.
However, South Africa noted that a sentencing legislative framework was under consideration,which provided that reparation may be imposed for any offence and must be considered in every case, while the damage suffered could be physical, psychological or other.
Reparation may be claimed by the direct victims and, where appropriate, the immediate family, dependants or other persons having a special relationship to the direct victims.
The second and third points made in article 47 on State responsibility are generally applicable also to the case that one of the responsible entities is an international organization: the injured party is not entitled"to recover, by way of compensation,more than the damage it has suffered"; the entity that provided reparation may have a right of recourse against the other responsible entities.
What victims perceive as adequate reparation may differ from case to case and depends on the particular suffering, and on the individual sense of justice.
Reparation may be claimed individually and where appropriate collectively, by the direct victims, the immediate family, dependants or other persons or groups of persons connected with the direct victims.
Reparation may include restitution from the offender ordered in the criminal court, aid from victim compensation programmes administered by the State and damages ordered to be paid in civil proceedings.
Reparation may be claimed individually and where appropriate collectively, by the direct victims of violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, the immediate family, dependants or other persons or groups of persons closely connected with the direct victims.
Reparation may be obtained only if the unlawful decision is annulled by an authority competent to annul such decisions on the basis of any of the extraordinary channels of appeal motion for reopening the case; second appeal; review of the decision in administrative procedure, i.e. not in the ordinary appellate procedure.
The fact that reparation may apply also to moral damages by international organizations finds confirmation in practice, especially in judgements by administrative tribunals, for instance in the judgement given by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal on 17 November 2000 in Robbins v. The Secretary-General of the United Nations, or in arbitral awards, such as that of 4 May 2000 in Boulois v. UNESCO.
The Special Rapporteur adds that reparations may be claimed by the direct victims and, where appropriate, the immediate family dependents or other persons having a special relationship to the direct victim.
He further suggested to insert in the subheading"Reparations may take any one…", after the word"Reparations", the words"shall be provided in accordance with the law of the State concerned.
Reparations may take any one or more of the forms mentioned below, which are not exhaustive, viz.
The Working Group welcomes the growing recognition in international human rights law that reparations may be awarded on both an individual and a collective basis.
Women's access to meaningful reparations may depend more on the procedural hurdles they may encounter than on the content of reparation measures.
Reparations may include a range of measures such as: rehabilitation; restitution; compensation; guarantees of non-recurrence and other symbolic measures such as apologies, memorials and commemorations.
The prolonged delay in delivering justice and providing reparations may further adversely affect public confidence in the rule of law.
We are of the opinion that full reparation might be excluded in case of material[financial] reparation if such a reparation would lead to an excessive burden for the responsible State.
United Nations experience demonstrates that reparations may facilitate reconciliation and confidence in the State, and thus lead to a more stable and durable peace in post-conflict societies.
Despite the fact that it is made clear in the preliminary remark to paragraphs 12 et seq. of the basic principles and guidelines that reparations may take any one or more of the forms mentioned, the list as a whole creates the impression that such instruments or measures usually have to be provided cumulatively.
Depending on the specific circumstances of each case, reparations may take the form of restitutio in integrum(restitution of the assets pillaged or stolen), monetary compensation, rehabilitation, including medical and psychological care as well as legal and social services, satisfaction, including a public apology with acknowledgement of the facts and acceptance of responsibility or guarantees of non-repetition.