Примеры использования Reservations should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
All reservations should be made only through this site.
Egypt, supported by China, expressed the view that reservations should be allowed.
Withdrawal of reservations should occur as early as possible.
Those States that have not done so should ratify the Convention,while those that have made reservations should remove them.
Any reservations should be limited to specific provisions.
Reservations should be considered when a confrontation was inevitable, for example in dealing with individual cases.
However, this does not mean that,as a general rule, reservations should be interpreted restrictively.
All the reservations should be guaranteed by valid credit card.
It was also noted that the Commission in its future work on reservations should consider the matter of the obligations of depositaries.
Hotel: Hotel reservations should be made directly with the Tourism Office in Grenoble. see attached form.
The Russian Federation noted that there were established international legal norms on this issue,including the Vienna Convention, and that reservations should be allowed.
States formulating reservations should provide the Director-General with reasons for the reservations. .
His delegation did not support draft guideline 2.1.8,which would alter the neutral"post office" concept of the depositary enshrined in the Vienna Convention; reservations should be circulated to the parties for whatever action they deemed appropriate.
Other delegations thought that reservations should be very strictly regulated in cases in which they were not authorized by the treaty itself.
The exceptional nature of latereservations must be stressed; his delegation therefore supported the proposal in the Guide to Practice that late reservations should be accepted only if there was unanimous and prior consent on the part of all parties to the treaty.
Such reservations should be considered null and void, as indicated clearly in article 19 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
If there were no such provisions in the treaty in question, reservations should be made in accordance with the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
Such reservations should be considered null and void, as emerged clearly from article 19 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
The view was also expressed that the issue of dispute settlement linked to reservations should be considered in the light of the role that monitoring bodies could play in that area.
Moreover, reservations should only be made and accepted by persons duly authorized to undertake international treaty responsibilities on behalf of the State in question.
Guideline 2.9.10 provided that the guidelines applicable to reactions to reservations should apply, mutatis mutandis, to reactions to conditional interpretative declarations.
In general, such reservations should be considered null and void and would invalidate the consent of a State to be bound by the treaty.
His delegation had repeatedly expressed the view that the legal regime governing reservations should be kept uniform and agreed that there should be no special regime for normative and, in particular, human rights treaties.
Those reservations should be distinguished from general ones which"nullified" any commitment and should be rejected together with reservations relating to jus cogens norms or obligations erga omnes.
It therefore seems reasonable to proceed on the basis of the idea that the procedure for withdrawing reservations should be modelled on the procedure for formulating them, although that may involve some adjustment and fine-tuning where appropriate.
Reservations should be precise, rather than general, and States should take into account the overall effect of a group of reservations, as well as the effect of each reservation on the integrity of the treaty.
States that saw fit to formulate reservations should do so as precisely and narrowly as possible and in accordance with international treaty law.
Such reservations should be withdrawn as a matter of priority, while any other reservations should be formulated as precisely as possible and in such a way as to ensure that none were contrary to international treaty law.
It stresses that reservations should be specific and transparent so that the obligations assumed by the ratifying States are clear.