Примеры использования Revised submission на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Revised submissions.
It also received a revised submission from Barbados.
Revised submission by Barbados.
Presentation of submissions, including revised submissions and addenda.
In a revised submission dated March 1996, the Claimant increased the total amount claimed to KWD 17,509,354.
Presentation of the submissions, including revised submissions and addenda, made by.
In particular, Barbados noted that it had agreed with the conclusions of the Subcommission in relation to the revised submission.
Russian Federation: revised submission in respect of the Okhotsk Sea.
During the reporting period, five new submissions and one partial revised submission were made.
Consideration of the partial revised submission made by the Russian Federation in respect of the Sea of Okhotsk.
If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
Consideration of the partial revised submission made by the Russian Federation in respect of the Sea of Okhotsk.
On 9 April 2012, the Chairperson of the Subcommission introduced to the Commission the draft recommendations in regard to the revised submission made by Barbados on 25 July 2011.
However, Emperor Xiaojing had a cordial relationship with Cui,who often revised submissions Gao made to Emperor Xiaojing and edicts Emperor Xiaojing issued to Gao Huan and Gao Cheng, to improve the style and content.
Such an assumption would be mistaken in the case of the Brazilian submission, given that the additional material andinformation submitted does not constitute a new or revised submission.
Pursuant to rule 51, paragraph 1, of the rules of procedure, the consideration of the revised submission would be included in the agenda of the twenty-ninth session.
The presentation of the partially revised submission of the Russian Federation to the Commission was made on 16 August by the head of delegation, Denis Gennadyevich Khramov, Deputy Minister of Natural Resources and Environment.
In this connection, the Commission recalled that at its twenty-sixth session,it had decided that revised submissions would be considered on a priority basis, notwithstanding the queue.
The Commission discussed the order in which potential revised submissions would be considered and decided that should any such submission be made to the Commission in the future, it would be considered on a priority basis notwithstanding the queue.
In that connection, the Commission recalled that, at its twenty-sixth session, it had decided that revised submissions would be considered on a priority basis, notwithstanding the queue.
The Commission discussed the order in which potential revised submissions would be considered, and decided that should any such submission be made to the Commission in future, it would be considered on a priority basis notwithstanding the queue.
On 12 February 2014, the Chair of the Subcommission introduced to the Commission the draft recommendations in regard to the partial revised submission made by the Russian Federation in respect of the Sea of Okhotsk on 28 February 2013.
Recalling the decision taken at its twenty-sixth session whereby revised submissions would be considered on a priority basis notwithstanding the queue(CLCS/68, para. 57), the Commission assigned the examination of the submission to the Subcommission referred to in paragraph 34 above.
Notes that the Commission, which examines submissions by way of seven-member subcommissions, already has on its agenda the simultaneous examination of three submissions made by Australia, Brazil and Ireland, andis still to receive and examine a revised submission from the Russian Federation;
Therefore, the Commission decided to inform Barbados that it should make a revised submission with regard to the portion of the outer limits of the continental shelf affected by the issue raised in its letter.
The Commission then continued its meeting in private. On 13 April 2012, following a thorough consideration of the draft recommendations and of the presentation made by the delegation,the Commission adopted by consensus the"Recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in regard to the revised submission made by Barbados on 25 July 2011.
It was added the procuring entity should be the party that decided whether a revised submission was a genuine improvement and whether it wanted the purported improvement concerned.
As noted in the section concerning the analysis of the pertinent provisions of the Convention, it is expected that additional data, information and clarifications provided by the coastal State to the Commission in response to such requests should support, integrate and clarify the particulars of the limits of the continental shelf contained in the submission, andthat they should not amount to a new or revised submission.
With regard to the recommendations in respect of the submission of Brazil, the Commission revisited the matter in the light of a communication from the Government of Brazil dated 15 February 2011,in which it stated its intention to make a revised submission and requested that no summary should be published prior to the conclusion of the examination of that submission. .
In particular, it contains an overview of the work on thesubmissions made by the Russian Federation, in respect of the Okhotsk Sea(revised submission); Uruguay; the Cook Islands, in respect of the Manihiki Plateau; Argentina; Ghana; Iceland, in respect of the Ægir Basin area and the western and southern parts of Reykjanes Ridge; Denmark, in respect of the area north of the Faroe Islands; and Pakistan.