Примеры использования Right of submission на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Abuse of the right of submission.
He submits that the communication is not an abuse of the right of submission.
Abuse of the right of submission, preclusion ratione temporis.
Procedural issues: Abuse of right of submission.
Abuse of right of submission; exhaustion of domestic remedies.
Люди также переводят
Procedural issue: Abuse of the right of submission.
Abuse of the right of submission; exhaustion of domestic remedies; substantiation of claim.
Counsel denies that the complaint constitutes an abuse of the right of submission.
Procedural issues: Abuse of right of submission; non-substantiation.
That the communication does not constitute an abuse of the right of submission.
Procedural issues: Abuse of the right of submission, State party's reservation.
Non-exhaustion of domestic remedies;abuse of the right of submission.
Procedural issues: Abuse of the right of submission; non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.
Moreover, the present communication constitutes an abuse of the right of submission.
It considers to be an abuse of the right of submission of such communications;
Procedural issues: Exhaustion of domestic remedies,abuse of right of submission.
In its statement of 11 April 1993,the State party argues that the authors abused the right of submission and that the communication should be declared inadmissible in accordance with article 3 of the Optional Protocol.
In the instant case, the Committee does not consider the three-year delay as an abuse of the right of submission.
Non-exhaustion of domestic remedies;abuse of right of submission; non-substantiation of claims.
Procedural issues: Another international instance of investigation,abuse of the right of submission.
The State party also argues that the complaint discloses an abuse of the right of submission, disputing whether the complainant can be considered to have justifiable interest in having his complaint considered by the Committee.
The Committee takes note of the State party's argument that the author has abused the right of submission of communications.
The State party alleges an abuse of the right of submission of communications, given that the author is attempting to use the Covenant to revisit to a case three years after the enforceable domestic ruling was handed down.
On 26 April 2007, the author commented on the State party's observations anddenies an abuse of the right of submission on her part.
The Committee has noted the State party's argument that the communication should be declared inadmissible as an abuse of the right of submission because of the long delay between the final judicial decision in the case and the submission of the communication to the Committee.
Although it regrets the delay in the submission of the communication,the Committee considers that the author did not abuse the right of submission of communications.
The Committee has noted the State party's argument that the communication should be declared inadmissible as an abuse of the right of submission because of the long delay between the final judicial decision in the case and the submission of the communication to the Committee.
In comparable situations of delay after the exhaustion of domestic remedies, the Committee has found an abuse of the right of submission.
Regarding the issue of delay andthe contention that the authors abused their right of submission, the authors reject the State party's argument.
The State party argues that, by submitting a communication to the Committee before her son had submitted to the Supreme Court a request for a supervisory review,the author has abused her right of submission.