Примеры использования Rules applicable to unilateral на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Part Two. Rules applicable to unilateral acts by which States assume obligations.
Sixth report of the Special Rapporteur on general rules applicable to unilateral acts conclusion of first part.
In relation to the possibility of drafting a provision defining a principle acta sunt servanda,the Special Rapporteur noted that such recognition would constitute a step forward in the codification of the rules applicable to unilateral acts.
Eighth report of the Special Rapporteur on rules applicable to unilateral acts not referred to in the seventh report.
These will be rules applicable to unilateral acts by which States assume unilateral obligations, a concept that to a certain extent describes an international promise, which is understood as having a unilateral character.
Whatever the final product, the Special Rapporteur believed that rules applicable to unilateral acts in general could be established.
Part Two of the draft articles, on rules applicable to unilateral acts by which States assume obligations, is offered for the Commission's consideration on this basis.
While it was not necessary at the current stage to decide on the nature of the first type of statements or on the question whether, for example,they were governed by rules applicable to unilateral legal acts, the concept of reservations would thus be clarified.
If common elements were found in the various categories, then general rules applicable to unilateral acts could be developed as the very substance of the draft articles.
Mr. Lavalle Valdés(Guatemala), speaking on unilateral acts of States, said that, despite an awareness of the difficulties of the topic,he did not share the view that it was not feasible to elaborate general rules applicable to unilateral acts, nor did he feel that the undeniable paucity of information on State practice was an insuperable obstacle.
There was one area where the rules of the law of treaties and the rules applicable to unilateral acts were of necessity divergent, and that was the area of the interpretation of unilateral acts.
A unilateral statement made by a State or an international organization by which that State orthat organization undertakes commitments going beyond the obligations imposed on it by a treaty does not constitute a reservation[and is governed by the rules applicable to unilateral legal acts], even if such a statement is made at the time of the expression by that State or that organization of its consent to be bound by the treaty.
The material assembled on an empirical basis should also include elements making it possible to identify not only the rules applicable to unilateral acts stricto sensu, with a view to the preparation of draft articles accompanied by commentaries, but also the rules which might apply to State conduct producing similar effects.
It was also pointed out that there was one area where the rules of the law of treaties and the rules applicable to unilateral acts were of necessity divergent; that was the area of the interpretation of unilateral acts see also section 4 below.
Secondly, the material assembled on an empirical basis should also include elements making it possible to identify not only the rules applicable to unilateral acts stricto sensu, with a view to the preparation of draft articles accompanied by commentaries, but also the rules that might apply to State conduct producing similar effects.
With regard to particular features of that outline, the view was expressed that its most important part was its chapter IV,entitled“General rules applicable to unilateral legal acts”, particularly section(b), relating to the“effects” of such acts, and sections(d) and(e), on“Conditions of validity” and“Consequences of the invalidity of an international legal act”.
Before attempting to establish rules of interpretation applicable to unilateral acts, reference should be made to the basic criterion distinguishing the way in which unilateral acts are interpreted from the way in which conventional acts are interpreted.
It was too early to consider making a distinction between general rules applicable to all unilateral acts and specific rules applicable to individual categories of such acts.
Seventh report of the Special Rapporteur on specific rules applicable to certain unilateral acts second part.
Thus, in one view,it was too early to consider making a distinction between general rules applicable to all unilateral acts and specific rules applicable to individual categories of such acts.
Chapter III addresses several questions within the framework of the possibility of elaborating common rules applicable to all unilateral acts, regardless of their name, content and legal effects.
In another view, there were certain common aspects relating, in particular, to the validity of international acts, the causes of invalidity andother topics which could be subject of common rules applicable to all unilateral acts.
According to this view,the Commission should confine itself to identifying and setting out rules which were applicable to unilateral acts in general, whatever the transaction might be that they might effect.
But it is also clear, and has been stressed in the Commission,that it is not always possible to establish common rules applicable to all unilateral acts if we conclude that there is, in fact, significant diversity among these acts.
On the same occasion, another representative indicated that despite the controversial nature of the subject-matter,he was convinced that the identification of general rules applicable to all unilateral acts was required to foster the stability and predictability of relations between States.
In the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly,some members were in agreement that the draft articles should be organized around the distinction between general rules applicable to all unilateral acts and specific rules applicable to individual categories of such acts, as had been suggested in the Commission by some members and by the Special Rapporteur himself.
His delegation therefore supported the suggestion that a distinction should be drawn between general rules applicable to all unilateral acts and specific rules applicable to individual categories of unilateral acts.
Moreover, he was not convinced that it would be necessary to divide the topic into general rules applicable to all unilateral acts and specific rules applicable to individual categories of unilateral acts.
His delegation would prefer to see the draft articles divided into two parts,the first devoted to rules common to all unilateral acts and the second addressing the rules applicable to the different categories of unilateral acts.
Some delegations supported point(b),according to which the draft articles could be structured around a distinction between general rules which might be applicable to all unilateral acts and specific rules applicable to individual categories of unilateral acts.