Примеры использования Safe area of bihać на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Serb assault on the safe area of Bihać.
The Secretary-General submitted his report(S/1994/1389) to the Council on 1 December 1994,as Bosnian Serb forces continued to operate from within the safe area of Bihać.
From late 1993 to mid-1994, the situation around the safe area of Bihać had been dominated by the conflict between two Bosniac armies.
After Žepa, the Serbs' next target was the safe area of Bihać.
Also pointed out that:"For the second consecutive day the safe area of Bihać is subject to attacks from the air by the aggressor's forces planes that take off from Udbine airport in the UNPA zones in the Republic of Croatia.";
Freed from its internalconflict with the Autonomists, the ARBiH Fifth Corps effected a break-out from the safe area of Bihać on 23 October 1994.
The international community has recently been aghast andscandalized when the United Nations Safe Area of Bihać in neighbouring Bosnia and Herzegovina has been, unchallenged, attacked by Serb insurgents from UNPAs.
A month ago, the aggression was extended because even the rebel Serbs from the United Nations Protected Areas(UNPAs) in Croatia crossed the border of Bosnia and Herzegovina using aircraft, tanks, infantry andall the means available, as they attacked the safe area of Bihać.
I regret to inform you that while both the so-called Krajina andBosnian Serbs attack the"safe area" of Bihać, they have launched new hostilities against two other"safe areas.
The unrelenting offensive and repeated attacks on the United Nations safe area of Bihać, as well as the public announcement made by the Bosnian Serb leadership, including Radovan Karadžić himself, which left no doubts as to their intention to launch immediately an all-out attack and overrun the defence of the aforementioned United Nations safe area; .
An offensive by paramilitary units controlled by the Knin authorities against the United Nations-declared safe area of Bihać is continuing unabated.
The European Council insists on an immediate cease-fire in and around the safe area of Bihać and on the withdrawal of the Bosnian Serb and the Krajina Serb forces from this area, to be followed by a cessation of hostilities throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Calls for a complete cessation of hostilities throughout the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina,including an immediate cease-fire in and around the safe area of Bihać, and demands that the aggressors accept a cease-fire;
The Foreign Ministers note that the assault on the United Nations safe area of Bihać has been carried out with the fuel supply received by the Croatian Serbs as well as military equipment, missile launchers, tanks, military specialists and volunteers from Serbia.
The European Council is alarmed by the renewed intensification of the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina andcondemns the violation of the safe area of Bihać by the Bosnian Serb forces and of the international border by the Krajina Serb forces.
Strongly condemns the latest violation of the status of the safe area of Bihać designated by the United Nations, as well as of the international border of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republic of Croatia by the Pale Serb and the so-called Krajina Serb forces operating from the United Nations Protected Areas within the Republic of Croatia, and all forces which support them;
The overall situation reached a crisis point when Bosnian Serb infantry entered the designated safe area of Bihać to repulse an offensive launched from the Bihać pocket in October by the Bosnian army.
In this connection, it should be recalled that in his latest report to the Security Council(S/1994/1389),the Secretary-General said unequivocally that the Muslims had misused the safe area of Bihać for launching an offensive against the Serbs last October.
Following criticism from a number of national leaders that UNPROFOR had failed to deter attacks on the safe area of Bihać, the Secretariat convened, on 28 November, a meeting of troop-contributing countries to raise the issue of whether they wished to have their forces participate in more robust enforcement action from the air.
On 16 November, the Secretariat instructed UNPROFOR to inform the Bosnian Serbs of the exact delimitation of the safe area of Bihać, and that any attack against that safe area would result in the use of air power.
For example, if the international community- namely UNPROFOR andNATO- fail to stop the ongoing Serbian offensive in the safe area of Bihać, Croatia would be faced with yet another flood of 150,000 to 200,000 refugees, while Bosnia and Herzegovina would lose the equal number of citizens in an area not only located between the two countries, but crucial to their present relations, survival and future existence.
UNPROFOR is bound, in cooperation with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO),to put a stop to offensives against the civilian population in the"safe area" of Bihać and to relieve blocked UNPROFOR units in order for them to resume the mission they had been brought there for.
About 9,500 troops from Croatian Serb"Lika Corps" and other units from sector"Glina" are participating in the offensive, andare attacking the southern part of the safe area of Bihać, blatantly violating the international border between the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
As the fighting escalated, there were increasing calls from NATO and others for a more robust response from UNPROFOR. On 9 September the United Nations Secretariat expressed its concern to UNPROFOR that itmight not be responding sufficiently, within its existing mandate, to Serb military activity around the safe areas of Bihać and Sarajevo.
Following a decision by the Council on 4 June 1993 to ensure full respect for the safe areas of Bihać, Gorazde, Sarajevo, Srebrenica, Tuzla and Žepa, the mandate of UNPROFOR was further enlarged to deter attacks against those safe areas. .
Gravely concerned at the situation throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina and the rapidly deteriorating situation in the safe areas of Sarajevo, Tuzla, Gorazde, Zepa, Srebrenica, andin particular the flagrant and blatant violations of the safe areas of Bihać which has been subject to continued attacks by the Bosnian Serbs and Croatian Serb forces.
Therefore, if the status of Bihać as a safe area becomes threatened, the Republic of Croatia may be compelled to take the necessary measures to secure its status and security.
I wish to reiterate the position of the Croatian Government, expressed on the adoption of Security Council resolution 1004(1995),that the displacement of the population of the Bihać safe area- numbering about 200,000- would be considered a serious threat to the security and stability of the Republic of Croatia.
I also request you to expedite the submission to the Security Council of a report on the stabilization of the situation in and around the Bihać"safe area", and on the implementation of the entire concept of"safe areas.
From the Republic of Croatia, the so-called Krajina Serbs continue their aggression against the Bihać safe area on the sovereign territory of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.