Примеры использования Same substantive на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Moreover, the State party notes that the same substantive rights are invoked before the Committee.
In this connection, the Committee recalls that the same matter concerns the same authors,the same facts and the same substantive rights.
Like the other draft resolutions before it,this draft resolution shares the same substantive intent of predetermining issues expressly reserved for negotiations.
According to its jurisprudence,"same matter" must be understood as relating to the same author,the same facts and the same substantive rights.
A jurisdiction that wished to adopt the unitary approach could achieve the same substantive results for sellers, financial lessors and institutional lenders through a functional concept of security.
The Committee recalls that the concept of"the same matter" has to be understood as including the same author,the same facts and the same substantive rights.
It is suggested that as long as the same substantive level of remedies is provided to transboundary victims as those made available to the nationals, the requirements of the principle should be treated as fully complied with.
The case before the Commission concerned the same complainant,the same facts, and the same substantive rights as the case before the Committee.
On the face of it, as long as the same substantive level of remedies are available to the nationals as are provided to the transboundary victims, the requirements of the principle appear to have been met.
As to what constitutes“the same matter”, the Committee understands it as relating to the same author,the same facts and the same substantive rights.
The second draft resolution, entitled"The risk of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East", contained in document A/C.1/64/L.4,contains the same substantive text as General Assembly resolution 63/84, but has been technically updated.
As to the question of whether the subject matter of the present communication is the same matter as the one examined by the European Court, the Committee recalls that the same matter concerns the same authors,the same facts and the same substantive rights.
It observes that application No. 8594/04 was submitted to the European Court by the same complainant,is based on the same facts, and relates to the same substantive rights as those invoked in the present communication.
The Committee recalls its jurisprudence that the"same matter" within the meaning of article 5, paragraph 2(a), must be understood as relating to the same author,the same facts and the same substantive rights.
In the case at issue, the application before the European Court was submitted by the same complainant,was based on the same facts and related to the same substantive rights as those invoked in the communication before the Committee.
The Committee recalls that the concept of"the same matter" has to be understood as including the same author,the same facts and the same substantive rights.
It was clear from the available information on the case file that the applications to the European Court of Human Rights concerned the same person and related to the same substantive rights as those invoked in the communication.
The Committee considers that a communication"has been", and"is being examined" by another procedure of international investigation or settlement if the examination by the procedure relates/related to the"same matter" within the meaning of article 22, paragraph 5(a), that must be understood as relating to the same parties,the same facts, and the same substantive rights.
In the present case, the application before the European Court was submitted by the same complainant, was based on the same facts and related,at least in part, to the same substantive rights as those invoked before the Committee.
The Committee considers that a communication has been, and is being, examined by another procedure of international investigation or settlement if the examination by the procedure relates/related to the"same matter" within the meaning of article 22, paragraph 5(a), that must be understood as relating to the same parties,the same facts, and the same substantive rights.
It observes that Application No. 34132/03 was submitted to the European Court by the same complainant, was based on the same facts, andrelated, at least in part, to the same substantive rights as those invoked in the present communication.
In this regard, the Committee recalls its jurisprudence to the effect that, for the purposes of article 5, paragraph 2(a), of the Optional Protocol, the"same matter" should be understood as referring to the same author,the same facts and the same substantive rights.
The Working Group of the Whole considered the list of substantive items contained in the provisional agenda for the fifty-firstsession of the Subcommittee(A/AC.105/C.1/L.332) and recommended that the same substantive items should be considered at the fifty-second session of the Subcommittee.
The Committee recalls that the concept of"the same matter" within the meaning of article 5, paragraph(a), of the Optional Protocol is understood as including the same authors,the same facts and the same substantive rights.
It notes that the case concerns the same individuals as did the case before the European Court of Human Rights andthat they are invoking the same substantive rights before the Committee.
The Committee recalls its jurisprudence that the"same matter" within the meaning of article 5, paragraph 2(a), must be understood as relating to the same author,the same facts and the same substantive rights.
The Committee notes that it is clear from the available information on the case file that the author's applications to the European Court of Human Rights concern the same person and relate to the same substantive rights as those invoked in the present communication.
The Committee recalls its jurisprudence that the"same matter" within the meaning of article 5, paragraph 2(a), must be understood as relating to the same author,the same facts and the same substantive rights.
It concludes from the information on the case file that Application No. 14986/04 submitted to the European Court in 2004 on behalf of the complainant concerned the same person,was based on the same facts, and related to the same substantive rights as those invoked in the present communication.
The Committee recalls its jurisprudence that the"same matter" within the meaning of article 5, paragraph 2(a), must be understood as relating to the same author,the same facts and the same substantive rights.