Примеры использования Shall not consider any communication на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Committee shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has ascertained that.
The Committee recalled that article 14, paragraph 7(a),of the Convention provides that the Committee shall not consider any communication unless it has ascertained that all available domestic remedies have been exhausted.
The Committee shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has ascertained that… the individual has exhausted all available domestic remedies.
It recalls its reservation under article 5, subparagraph 2(a), of the Optional Protocol,that the Committee shall not consider any communication from an individual when the same matter has already been examined by the European Commission.
In addition, the Committee shall not consider any communication unless it has ascertained that the same matter has not been examined under another procedure of international examination or settlement and that all available domestic remedies have been exhausted art. 5, para. 2.
On 29 December 2007, the State party reiterates thataccording to article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol, the Committee shall not consider any communication from an individual before ascertaining that all available domestic remedies have been exhausted.
The Committee recalls that it shall not consider any communication from an individual under article 22, paragraph 5(a), of the Convention, unless it has ascertained that the same matter has not been, and is not being, examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.
Article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights states that:"The Committee shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has ascertained that the individual has exhausted all available domestic remedies.
In accordance with article 22, paragraph 5(b), of the Convention, the Committee shall not consider any communication unless it has ascertained that the individual has exhausted all available domestic remedies; this rule does not apply where it has been established that the application of the remedies has been unreasonably prolonged, or that it is unlikely to bring effective relief to the alleged victim.
Sweden has entered a declaration with regard to the 1966 Optional Protocol to the ICCPR to the effect that Sweden's understanding is that Article 5,paragraph 2 of the Protocol implies that the Human Rights Committee shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined, or has not been examined, under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.
In other words, the subparagraph must be understood as meaning that the Committee"shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.
As to the author's claim that already at the time of the trial at the Northern Territory Supreme Court on contempt of court he suffered from manic-depressive disorder and was unable properly to understand what was going on(art. 14, para. 1), the Committee recalls thatpursuant to article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol, it shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has ascertained that the individual has exhausted all available domestic remedies.
Pursuant to article 5, paragraph 2(b),of the Optional Protocol, the Committee shall not consider any communication unless it has ascertained that the author has exhausted all available domestic remedies.
The Committee considers that the Spanish version of article 5, paragraph 2(a), of the Optional Protocol,which states that the Committee shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has ascertained that the same matter"has not been examined already"("no ha sido sometido ya" in the Spanish) under another procedure of international investigation or settlement, can result in the Spanish version of this paragraph being interpreted differently from the other language versions.
The Spanish Government accedes to the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the understanding that the provisions of article 5, paragraph 2,of that Protocol mean that the Human Rights Committee shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has ascertained that the same matter has not been or is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.
Under article 5, paragraph 2(a),of the Optional Protocol, the Committee shall not consider any communication when the same matter is being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.
Upon acceding to the Optional Protocol, the State party entered a reservation to the Optional Protocol which reads:"On the understanding that the provisions of article 5,paragraph 2, of the Protocol signify that the Human Rights Committee provided for in article 28 of the said Covenant shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined or has not been examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.
This provision contrasts with the ICCPR OP(art. 5),which states that the Committee shall not consider any communication unless it has been ascertained that"the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.
Norway recognises the competence of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination to receive and considers communications from individuals or groups of individuals within the jurisdiction of Norway in accordance with Article 14,with the reservation that the Committee shall not consider any communication from an individual or group of individuals unless the Committee has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined or has not been examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.
The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka also proceeds on the understanding that the Committee shall not consider any communication from individuals unless it has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined or has not been examined under any other procedure of international investigation or settlement.
The Government of the Italian Republic recognizes that competence on the understanding that the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination shall not consider any communication without ascertaining that the same matter is not being considered or has not already been considered by another international body of investigation or settlement.
The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka also proceeds on the understanding that the Committee shall not consider any communication from individuals unless it has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined or has not been examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.
Upon ratification of the Optional Protocol on 10 December 1987, the State party entered the following reservation:"On the understanding that, further to the provisions of article 5(2) of the Protocol,the Committee provided for in article 28 of the Covenant shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has been ascertained that the same matter has not been examined by the European Commission on Human Rights established by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
The Principality of Liechtenstein recognizes that competence on the understanding that the said Committee shall not consider any communication without ascertaining that the same matter is not being considered or has not already been considered under another international procedure of investigation or settlement.
In cases Nos. 990/2001(Irschik v. Austria), 1002/2001(Wallmann v. Austria) and 1060/2002(Deisl v. Austria), the Committee considered the reservation made by Austria to article 5 ofthe Optional Protocol and according to which"the Committee… shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has been ascertained that the same matter has not been examined by the European Commission on Human Rights established by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
The Committee recalls that, in accordance with article 22,paragraph 5(b), of the Convention, it shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has ascertained that the individual has exhausted all available domestic remedies.
The Committee recalls that,in accordance with article 22, paragraph 5(b), of the Convention, it shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has ascertained that the individual has exhausted all available domestic remedies.
The Government of Malta recognizes this competence on the understanding that the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination shall not consider any communication without ascertaining that the same matter is not being considered or has not already been considered by another international body of investigation or settlement.
The Government of Malta recognizes that competence on the understanding that the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination shall not consider any communication without ascertaining that the same matter is not being considered or has already been considered by another international body of investigation or settlement.”.
In case No. 1086/2002(Weiss v. Austria), the Committee considered the reservation made by Austria to article 5 ofthe Optional Protocol and according to which"the Committee… shall not consider any communication from an individual unless it has been ascertained that the same matter has not been examined by the European Commission on Human Rights established by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.