Примеры использования Should be deleted as it на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Subparagraph(d) should be deleted, as it adds nothing to the provisions of subparagraph c.
Mr. O'Flaherty suggested that the paragraph should be deleted as it contained examples only.
Article xx should be deleted, as it would create problems of interpretation of the crimes defined in article 5.
He also agreed that the third sentence should be deleted as it referred to specific contexts.
Article 49 should be deleted, as it is not a core issue of the law of State responsibility. Japan.
Article 30(b)(assurances andguarantees of non-repetition) should be deleted as it does not reflect international practice. United States.
In response, it was explained that the substantive law would determine its applicability to the electronic transferable record, andthat therefore the word"corresponding" should be deleted as it could be misleading.
Ms. Chanet said that the reference to the number ofStates parties to the Optional Protocol,"At present, more than two-thirds…", should be deleted, as it dated the general comment.
In that context, article 4, paragraph 3, should be deleted as it contradicted general State practice.
With regard to paragraph 41 of the memorandum by the Secretary-General,the Chairman informed the General Commit-tee that item(d)(United Nations Population Fund) should be deleted as it was already cited under item c.
While it was recalled that paragraph 2 was included to specifically deal with the possibility of issuing an electronic transferable record to bearer,it was stated that paragraph 2 should be deleted as it reiterated the general principle stated in article 1, paragraph 2.
Sub-paragraph(4) should be deleted as it duplicates sub-paragraph(2) and is an internal procedure of the competent authorities.
Mr. Kälin said that in the English version of paragraph 6 the first sentence should be deleted, as it had been in the French and Spanish versions.
The last sentence of paragraph 46 should be deleted as it replicates the same point made in the first sentence of paragraph 47; see A/CN.9/767, para. 49 a.
Moreover, the words“considered to be characterized by civil disturbances by the central authorities” should be deleted, as it expressed the position of the Indian Government.
One view was that it should be deleted as it was too detailed and the matter should be left to each State.
The reference to"technologies" in paragraph 8 of the Chairman's draft conclusions should be deleted, as it exceeded the scope of article III, paragraph 2, of the NPT.
The view is that article 47 should be deleted, as it conflicts with Egyptian law, which provides that it cannot be agreed not to issue a transport document or electronic transport record.
In addition to these areas(see General remarks), the United States would like to draw the attention of the Commission to other provisions, including article 30(b) on assurances and guarantees of non-repetition,which we believe should be deleted as it reflects neither customary international law nor State practice.
A view was also expressed that the article should be deleted as it addressed a nationality issue not directly related to a succession of States.
With respect to subsection A.2(period of effectiveness of registered notice), it was agreed that:(a) the discussion of the mandatory requirement of indicating in the notice its period of effectiveness should be placed in the part of the draft Registry Guide dealing with the required content of a notice; and(b)the discussion of a default period of effectiveness in options B and C should be deleted as it was inconsistent with the Secured Transactions Guide.
Accordingly, the reference to the"primary" responsibility should be deleted as it implied the existence of"secondary" duties, which could lead to unwarranted intervention.
One view was that the note should be deleted as it could be taken as a recommendation to legislators to adopt unnecessary exceptions to the principle in paragraphs 26 and 27 privileged claims, carve-outs, equitable subordination.
Elaborating on his delegation's written comments on the draft articles on State responsibility,he said that draft article 19 served no useful purpose and should be deleted, as it was inappropriate to equate a sovereign State with a common criminal by describing its conduct, however brutal, as“penal”, for it was the penal act of an individual which rendered a State culpable of a penal act.
Similarly, draft article 20, paragraph 2, should be deleted as it just largely restates the general principle of draft article 20, paragraph 1, but with more specificity, while introducing a principle of"fair balance" that is neither sufficiently grounded in existing law and practice, nor desirable as a matter of progressive development.
In paragraph 68, the last sentence should be deleted as it was inconsistent with the Guide which always required the grantor's identifier.
With respect to paragraph 4, it was agreed that it should be deleted as it was inconsistent with recommendation 2, subparagraph(b), of the Secured Transactions Guide, it was unnecessary as it envisaged transactions involving individual secured creditors that were extremely difficult to envisage, and the relevant issues were sufficiently addressed in paragraph 5.
The reference to authorization for advance registration should be deleted as it gave the impression that, contrary to recommendation 67, prior authorization was necessary for advance registration; and.