Примеры использования Significant transboundary harm на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Convention on the Prevention of Significant Transboundary Harm.
Thus, significant transboundary harm must have been caused by the"physical consequences" of activities in question.
Activities not prohibited by international law which involve a risk of causing significant transboundary harm.
The term“significant transboundary harm” was complex and tainted by ambiguity, as discussed in other contexts.
It would go too far, in their view,to require States to provide compensation for all sorts of significant transboundary harm.
Significant transboundary harm resulting over a period of time should thus be subject to the obligation of prevention.
It was going too far to require States to provide compensation for all sorts of significant transboundary harm.
The fourth criterion is that the significant transboundary harm must have been caused by the"physical consequences" of such activities.
The third criterion is that activities covered in these articles must involve a"risk of causing significant transboundary harm.
To say that"liability arises from significant transboundary harm" is to leave open the question of precisely who(or what) is liable.
It is understood that the topic should deal with those activities which have a risk of causing substantial or significant transboundary harm.
It was also noted that article 1 had failed to define the term"significant transboundary harm", which was pivotal to the whole regime.
Article 3 imposes on the State a duty to take all necessary measures to prevent, orto minimize the risk of causing, significant transboundary harm.
The State of origin shall take all appropriate measures to prevent significant transboundary harm or at any event to minimize the risk thereof.
In addition to elaborating a general definition, it would be necessary to draw up a list of activities andmaterials capable of causing significant transboundary harm.
The fourth criterion to delimit the scope of the topic is that the significant transboundary harm must have been caused by the"physical consequences" of activities in question.
The obligation for prevention extends to taking appropriate measures to identify activities creating a risk of causing significant transboundary harm.
These are activities that have a high probability of causing significant transboundary harm or a low probability of causing disastrous transboundary harm. .
Article 1 defined the scope of the draft articles, namely,activities not prohibited by international law which involve a risk of causing significant transboundary harm.
The assessment of whether a given utilization causes, or not, significant transboundary harm is a priority factor for the assessment of the equitable and reasonable nature of such an utilization.
That so-called principle could be used as a pretext to victimize neighbouring States by carrying out activities which caused significant transboundary harm.
As his delegation had suggested previously, the draft articles should cover not only significant transboundary harm but also harm caused in areas outside national jurisdiction.
That so-called principle could be used as a pretext to victimize neighbouring States by carrying out activities which caused significant transboundary harm.
The Commission refers to the duty to cooperatein good faith(article 4) in preventing significant transboundary harm and to seek solutions"based on an equitable balance of interests" article 9.
However, she agreed with those delegations which had pointed out the need for a mechanism for determining whether a particular activity might cause significant transboundary harm.
The duty to prevent significant transboundary harm involves the requirement of assessing whether a particular activity actually has the potential of causing such significant harm. .
He felt that draft article 1- covering activities"which involve a risk of causing significant transboundary harm"- was phrased too abstractly.
Where assessment reveals the risk of causing significant transboundary harm, in accordance with paragraph 1, the State which plans to undertake such activity has the obligation to notify the States which may be affected.
Article 3 states that the State of origin shall take all appropriate measures to prevent significant transboundary harm or at any event to minimize the risk thereof.
In this way, the Convention, just as the other environmental treaties, closely tracks article 3 of the draft articles on prevention of transboundary harm, laying down the general duty of States to prevent significant transboundary harm.