Примеры использования Some countries expressed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Nevertheless, some countries expressed reservations on the use of integrated assessment models.
Most of respondents were inclined to support this recommendation, but some countries expressed reservations or made suggestions on how to implement it.
Some countries expressed their readiness to consider providing financial contributions to the trust funds.
Cooperation was generally felt to be useful, although some countries expressed regret that no confidential information could be supplied in this context.
Some countries expressed their willingness to share their own experience in addition to receiving assistance.
Because of limited participatory process in NAP preparation andstructural changes in some countries, some countries expressed their intention to revise and update the NAPs.
Some countries expressed a willingness to contribute additional troops if financial resources were made available.
However, during this project, the software was presented in all ACP regions and some countries expressed interest in receiving technical assistance from UNCTAD in the area of Market Information Systems MIS.
Some countries expressed their preparedness to make use of their SDRs to support IMF lending to the poorest countries. .
Following prolonged discussion on theprovision of Internet access, with numerous clarifications from the Secretariat, some countries expressed concern about the relatively high financial implications of providing Internet services.
Some countries expressed concern at what they considered to be cases of misuse of the right of access to justice by NGOs Poland.
The threshold of 12 months seemed to be the most widely used andaccepted in the majority of countries, but some countries expressed the need to revisit this definition to consider shorter duration of stay and allow the coverage of more migrants, in particular short-term migrants.
Some countries expressed their concerns about the availability of requested data on a number of MCPFE quantitative indicators at the regional and national levels.
The Committee concluded that while some countries expressed support for such a Convention, there was, at present, no consensus.
Some countries expressed the need for a cautious approach to the review of the adequacy of commitments and decisions on commitments in the light of such review.
In the RID/ADR/ADN Joint Meeting in March 2012 some countries expressed the opinion that substances other than wastes may be carried in vacuum-operated waste tanks according to the existing text of RID/ADR.
Some countries expressed the belief that communications was an integral part of welfare because it was mentioned in the COE Manual in the paragraph in which welfare was explained.
While commending the merits of the recommendations, some countries expressed concern at what they considered to be double standards applied by the Council when imposing sanctions, which, in their view, have undermined sanctions regimes.
Some countries expressed a concern that a decision of an intergovernmental Committee would be legally binding and could potentially affect the tax sovereignty of countries. .
During previous discussions on this issue, some countries expressed that they interpret the text in sub-section 5.3.2.1.1 to already require orange coloured plates on the rear of trailers, even when they are separated from their motor vehicle.
Some countries expressed their concerns about possible duplication with assessments carried out within UNCTAD and by other organizations, and questions were raised about the sources of information that would be used for the assessment.
As far as the follow-up to the review was concerned, some countries expressed the opinion that additional commitments could best be negotiated by an open-ended working group, leaving the subsidiary bodies established by the Convention free to carry out their other important tasks.
Some countries expressed the will to undertake deeper emission cuts, others the need for enhanced actions to implement existing commitments, while others were ready to undertake mitigation actions with the assistance of incentives.
As a result, some countries expressed the desire to pursue the installation of RailTracker directly with UNCTAD on national funding.
Some countries expressed concern about the lack of a national system for the exchange of environmental information between different ministries and noted that some enterprises did not conduct monitoring or may falsify information about emissions Kyrgyzstan.
Some countries expressed the view that technology transfer must be on a voluntary basis and on mutually agreed terms and conditions, and reaffirmed their commitment to working to ensure that countries have access to the technology to mitigate and adapt to climate change and other environmental challenges.
Some countries expressed the view that NCSA is not necessarily the appropriate instrument to address the capacity needs of affected countries in attending to their DLDD issues, and reported that the support of the Global Environment Facility(GEF) for capacity-building at national level is quite limited.
Some countries expressed the view that the Working Group should discuss issuing guidance on the ways in which designated representatives of the United Nations should interact with the wider membership before and after their encounters with external bodies so that the positions of the Assembly could be properly conveyed.
Some countries expressed an interest in following the activities of Parties in other regions, and in developing cooperation with other UNCCD regions, in particular between Annex IV and Annexes I and II in the framework of the Mediterranean area, and between Annex V and Annex II in the context of Central Asia.
Article 1 posed the problem of the right to make a visit,with the representatives of some countries expressing the view that the subcommittee to be established under article 2 should organize missions to States only on invitation, while others maintained that in that case there would be no point in preparing a protocol, the purpose of which was to enable missions to be conducted without invitation.