Примеры использования Some experts noted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Some experts noted that there was further work that needed to be done.
On employment effects, some experts noted that, in some cases, layoffs are inevitable if the target company was run inefficiently.
Some experts noted that Governments' ability to do so was limited.
Some experts noted the slow transfer of technology and knowledge to developing countries.
Some experts noted that threshold was a subjective concept depending on the context.
Some experts noted that a forest-related instrument may not bind other instruments.
Some experts noted the importance of the guidelines and expressed their general support for their development.
Some experts noted that out-crossing did not in and of itself constitute damage to biological diversity.
Some experts noted the desirability of developing a reporting system to facilitate the process for assessing progress.
Some experts noted the development of new technologies, including in personnel armour, and new training methods.
Some experts noted that the corresponding European Union Directive was still under consideration for amendments.
Some experts noted that national security concerns are genuine and have increased in many countries recently.
Some experts noted that differences in approaches would reflect uncertainty regarding the interpretation of established terms.
Some experts noted that reform had significant social repercussions, as it would displace SMEs and micro players.
Some experts noted that privatization deals often include additional future investment commitments by foreign investors.
Some experts noted the potential for mode 4 trade between developing countries, particularly at the regional level.
Some experts noted that the“first generation” of genetic engineering applications in agriculture was aimed at improving traits involving single genes.
Some experts noted the importance of capacity-building at the national level with regard to the development of measures for the prevention of damage to biological diversity.
Some experts noted that it was important to secure stakeholder involvement, and it was also pointed out that this could be difficult when there were so many processes.
Some experts noted that the concept of damage to biological diversity should reflect the definition of“biological diversity” as contained in Article 2 of the Convention.
Some experts noted that porous borders and limited border control capabilities presented a significant challenge as IEDs were a transnational problem.
Some experts noted that it would be practically difficult to introduce amendments to current international regimes to specifically include damage to biological diversity.
Some experts noted that a convention or protocol might provide access to new funding mechanisms, including more explicit recognition and direct access to funds, such as GEF.
Some experts noted that Article 10A of the Montreal Protocol commits developed country parties to transfer technologies to beneficiary developing countries on fair and most favourable terms.
Some experts noted concern about ozone and airborne particulate matter(PM), while others stressed the importance of including ship and aircraft emissions in calculations.
Some experts noted that the Clean Development Mechanism has so far been the largest climate-related international source of private financing for low carbon technologies in developing countries.
Some experts noted that a possible way to reduce PAH air emissions further would be to address the production and use of creosote and carbolineum under annex I or II to the Protocol.
Some experts noted that FDI flows go to only a small number of developing countries and therefore cannot fully meet the technological needs to address global environmental problems.
Some experts noted that technical cooperation was required for countries signatories to the Lomé Convention as regards the negotiation of a post-Lomé agreement that responded to the development needs of its signatories.
In this context, some experts noted that benefits to the company receiving an incentive should be assessed against the benefits accruing to the host economy, notably through spillover effects.