Примеры использования Some nuclear powers на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Some nuclear Powers still refuse to undertake not to be the first to use such weapons.
However the lack of compliance and commitment by some nuclear Powers undermined the political will of those who wished to meet their obligations.
Some nuclear powers are still expanding their arsenals, and all are currently conducting a qualitative upgrade of their arsenals.
We would like to know what are the real reasons why some nuclear Powers reject the five Ambassadors' proposal even at the risk of falling into these contradictions.
Some nuclear Powers clearly lack the political will required to achieve the objective of eliminating nuclear weapons and prohibiting them for ever.
In its opinion, it was also justified to put on the scale other relevant obligations andefforts undertaken by some nuclear Powers which were beneficial to all non-nuclear-weapon States. 11/.
We were disappointed that some nuclear Powers resumed testing immediately after the conclusion of the Conference.
Some nuclear Powers and their allies continue to include the doctrine of nuclear response against non-nuclear threats in their defence alliances.
Since it is impossible to make reservations tothe Treaty of Tlatelolco, which does not allow them, some nuclear Powers have resorted to the subterfuge of formulating interpretative declarations when signing or ratifying the additional protocols to the Treaty.
However, some nuclear powers limit the nuclear problem to the issue of horizontal non-proliferation, while proceeding with the modernization of their nuclear arsenals.
At a time when those States which have abandoned the nuclear option are being asked to commit to new non-proliferation measures, some nuclear Powers are pressing ahead with programmes to upgrade their nuclear arsenals in order to maintain a"credible" nuclear deterrent capability.
It is evident that some nuclear Powers lack the political will required to achieve the elimination and prohibition of nuclear weapons forever.
Nor can we be oblivious of the fact that some nuclear Powers continue to oppose or at least to be ambivalent about a comprehensive ban on nuclear testing.
Some nuclear Powers have even used such interpretative declarations to reserve for themselves the possibility of using nuclear weapons on grounds which, in their view, constitute legitimate self-defence.
Instead of eliminating nuclear weapons, some nuclear Powers have plans to modernize or develop new kinds or new uses of nuclear weapons or new rationales for them.
Some nuclear Powers have declared that nuclear weapons are to be retained against uncertain threats emanating from unspecified adversaries, including non-nuclear-weapon States.
At the Seventh NPT Review Conference, it became obvious that some nuclear Powers still lack the political will needed to attain the objective of eliminating and prohibiting nuclear weapons once and for all.
Some nuclear Powers say on the one hand that they are committed to the total elimination of nuclear weapons, but on the other hand refuse to address the subject, let alone negotiate it, in the framework of the Conference.
Indeed, we are concerned about the attitude of some nuclear Powers that sub-critical nuclear tests are permissible under the CTBT because there is no nuclear criticality or fission chain reaction.
However, some nuclear Powers believe that further reductions in the stockpiles of the two largest nuclear countries should take place before they join the process of negotiations aimed at reduction and limitation of nuclear weapons.
The discussion must instead focus on the signs that some nuclear Powers might use nuclear weapons with a limited and controllable scope on people made defenceless by poverty, hunger and disease.
Although some nuclear Powers had discontinued nuclear testing and used every precaution in transporting and burying their radioactive wastes, much still needed to be done to neutralize the nuclear danger.
In that regard, his delegation wished to reiterate its deep concern about the fact that some nuclear Powers which had space capability were continuing to block negotiations in the Conference on Disarmament on the formulation of an international instrument to prevent an arms race in outer space.
Some nuclear Powers have put forward the view that in the area of security guarantees, Security Council resolution 984(1995) is sufficient, along with the guarantees derived from the additional protocols to the treaties establishing nuclear-weapon-free zones.
In that connection, his delegation strongly objected to the fact that some nuclear Powers, which were also space Powers, were hindering the possibility of making progress within the framework of the Conference on Disarmament on the negotiation of an international treaty or instrument aimed at preventing an arms race in outer space.
It is clear that some nuclear Powers do not have the political will necessary to attain the goal of the elimination and prohibition of those weapons once and for all.
While a sizeable number of States are covered orare in the process of protecting themselves through nuclear-weapon-free zones and some nuclear Powers have voluntarily granted negative security assurances to various non-nuclear-weapon States, Venezuela considers it necessary for such guarantees to take the form of a legally binding instrument as a result of international agreements to assure non-nuclear-weapon States against the use or threat of nuclear weapons on the basis of the five Ambassadors' proposal.
At the same time, some nuclear Powers continue to support States that are not parties to the Treaty and that have acquired or are exchanging information about acquiring nuclear weapons, in clear contravention of their commitment to work to cause those States to adhere to the Treaty as non-nuclear-weapon States.
Indonesia hoped that some nuclear Powers which had opposed the initiative would now be ready to reconsider their position.
Unilateral declarations by some nuclear Powers, by means of which they have committed themselves not to resort to the use or the threat of the use of nuclear weapons against States which do not have such weapons, have constituted an important step in the right direction- this fact must be stated and welcomed.