Примеры использования Steering body noted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Steering Body noted that the monitoring strategy could in principle facilitate inverse modelling.
In the discussion that followed, the Steering Body noted the usefulness of projects like EURODELTA and CITYDELTA.
The Steering Body noted the importance of developing the baseline scenario for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol and urged Parties to collaborate with CIAM and provide the necessary data.
Following a discussion on the topics presented, the Steering Body noted the high quality of the presentations delivered during the workshop, which had been prepared by Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections.
The Steering Body noted that some emissions reported by countries were replaced with estimates by CIAM for modelling purposes.
With regard to the status of emission data reporting(EB. AIR/GE.1/2004/10), the Steering Body noted that timeliness and completeness of submissions had improved over the previous year, though there were still gaps in the time series for many Parties, especially for the 1980s.
The Steering Body noted with appreciation the Parties' plans to implement the EMEP monitoring strategy.
The Steering Body noted that nationally submitted data and expert estimates might both be of value for comparison with measurements.
The Steering Body noted the ongoing work under the EUSAAR project on the development of a standardized method for EC/OC measuring.
The Steering Body noted that the review of the RAINS integrated assessment model indicated it was a scientifically reliable tool for policy advice.
The Steering Body noted that heavy metal and POPs inventories continued to have significant uncertainties, an indication that official estimates were too low.
The Steering Body noted that despite the satisfactory development of the EMEP model over past years, the limitations observed earlier in reproducing the pollution levels were also observed in 2003.
The Steering Body noted that all the status reports relevant for the evaluation of progress in implementation of the workplan for 2013 had been prepared by the EMEP Centres on time and were all available on the EMEP website.
The Steering Body noted that countries that were not Parties to the Protocols were not obliged to participate in the reviews, but were strongly encouraged to do so, with a view to improving the quality of inventories;
The Steering Body noted with appreciation the progress in the modelling work on hemispheric air pollution, invited MSC-W to continue this work and invited the other EMEP centers and the Task Force to collaborate.
The Steering Body noted that there were still considerable uncertainties with PM emission inventories and urged Parties to enhance their efforts to improve the quality of their PM emission reporting.
The Steering Body noted progress in modelling hemispheric air pollution, invited MSC-W to continue this work and invited the Task Force on Measurements and Modelling and the other EMEP centres to collaborate.
The Steering Body noted with concern the pending arrears of Ukraine for the periods 1992- 1994 and 1996- 2001, amounting to a total of US$ 343,657 that were to be covered through the implementation of two projects.
The Steering Body noted that measurements of particulates wereas improving and requested Parties to continue this trend, in particular their efforts in setting up monitoring sites for PM 2.5 and chemical composition.
The Steering Body noted that all the status reports relevant for the evaluation of progress in implementation of the workplan for 2011 had been prepared by the EMEP centres on time and were all available on the EMEP website http://www. emep. int.
At its thirtieth session, the Steering Body noted with concern the lack of information on the implementation of both projects and urged Ukraine to report on progress to the Bureau at its meeting in spring 2007.
The Steering Body noted that the four status reports relevant for the evaluation of progress in implementation of the workplan for 2010 had been prepared by the EMEP centres on time and were all available on the EMEP website http://www. emep. int.
The Steering Body noted with satisfaction that the emission projections for quite a few of the non-EC countries had been updated, but noted also with concern that activity projections for some Parties might be outdated.
At its thirtieth session, the Steering Body noted with concern the lack of information on the implementation of the project and invited Ukraine to complete the project as soon as possible, to discuss the results with MSC-East, and to report to the Bureau at its meeting in spring 2007.
At its thirtieth session, the Steering Body noted with concern the lack of information on the development of the project and invited Ukraine to proceed with the implementation of the project in cooperation with CCC without delay and to report on progress to the Bureau at its meeting in spring 2007.
The Steering Body noted the change of name of the EMEP/CORINAIR Emission Inventory Guidebook into"EMEP/EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook- Technical Guidance to Prepare National Emission Inventories following the LRTAP Convention's Reporting Guidelines and the EU National Emission Ceilings Directive" hereinafter, the Guidebook.
Concerning work on heavy metals, the Steering Body noted with appreciation the good progress made in the monitoring and modelling of heavy metals, noted that there were some improvements to the monitoring and emissions data reported, but stressed that emission data quality, for instance for cadmium and mercury, was the most important limitation for improvingement of model model results.
The Steering Body noted with concern the limited progress made by Ukraine in implementing the two projects through which it was expected to cover its pending arrears for the periods 1992- 1994 and 1996- 2001, amounting to a total of US$ 343,657:(a) the development a national model for environmental impact assessment of heavy metal emissions; and(b) the establishment of an EMEP monitoring station in close cooperation with CCC.
The Steering Body also noted with satisfaction the full implementation of the division of work between the two meteorological centres.
The Steering Body also noted the importance of level 2 and level 3 monitoring data to validate the model;