Примеры использования Support of that view на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In support of that view, it was suggested that paragraph(5) should remain, as drafted, in its current location.
One view was that the application of chapter V should only supplement the substantive law provisions of the draft Convention andthus apply only to the transactions falling within the ambit of the draft Convention as defined in chapter I. In support of that view, it was stated that, from a legislative policy point of view, it would not be appropriate to attempt, in essence, to prepare a mini private international law convention within a substantive law convention.
In support of that view, it was pointed out that the term"undeliverable" would likely be interpreted narrowly in any event.
In support of that view, it was observed that an exclusion in draft article 4 was preferable for reasons of simplicity and predictability.
In support of that view, it was stated that it was useful to clarify who the participants of a preparatory conference might be.
In support of that view, it was stated that in many legal systems unincorporated businesses fell into the category of individuals.
In support of that view, it was said that it was important to recall that the subject matter of the provision was nonlocalized damage to the goods.
In support of that view, it was stated that a place-of-incorporation approach would result in reference being made to a single and easily determinable jurisdiction.
In support of that view, it was observed that the application of the law of a single and easily determinable jurisdiction would enhance certainty.
In support of that view, it was said that the assignee should be entitled to all payment rights the assignor had been entitled to under the original contract.
In support of that view, it was stated that digital signatures were so well known and widely used that they deserved to be given priority.
In support of that view, the point was made that the language of the revised proposal was such as not to allow for flexibility in the Committee's carrying out of its work.
In support of that view, it was noted that if substantive consolidation included only insolvent members of a group, few assets would be available for consolidation.
In support of that view, it was also stated that the provisions would otherwise lead to unfair or unequal treatment and negatively restrict freedom of opportunities and participation;
In support of that view, it was recalled that draft article 12 was based on the policy decision that acknowledgement procedures should be used at the discretion of the originator.
In support of that view, it was explained that parties involved in arbitral proceedings were becoming increasingly concerned over the absence of any rules in respect of confidentiality.
In support of that view, the Inspectors draw attention to Council decision 1979/68 of 3 August 1979, in which the Council decided to keep under review the implementation of the relationship agreements.
In support of that view, it was stated that attempts at unification and harmonization of the subject which had been previously undertaken at a regional or international level, had had limited success.
In support of that view, it was observed that further explanation was required in the Guide in respect of article 1 to clarify the circumstances in which a conciliation could be deemed to exist.
In support of that view, it was also suggested that consideration should be given to drawing up rules for the Special Committee that would regulate its work and that would be agreeable to all States.
In support of that view, it was stated that the time of signing of a data message was not the focus of draft article 3 and the inclusion of such a reference was likely to lead to uncertainty.
In support of that view, it was said that the arbitral tribunal would be best placed to police matters of confidential and sensitive information that might be contained in the notice of arbitration.
In support of that view, it was observed that the current text reflected the discussion in the Working Group and was consistent with the approach taken in the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration.
In support of that view, it was also noted that decisions of the Meeting of States Parties, such as those contained in document SPLOS/72, SPLOS/183 and SPLOS/201, related to the implementation of the Convention.
In support of that view, it was stated that the proviso could even be counterproductive, because it could give the wrong impression that there were two different degrees of party autonomy, a higher and a lesser one.
In support of that view, it was stated that incorporation by reference was of particular importance to EDI in view of the need to abbreviate messages for reasons of economy or to use codes for reasons of machine-processability.
In support of that view, it was further suggested that all four subjects reflected in paragraph 298 of the 2001 report merited the attention of the Special Committee, and therefore should be considered for inclusion in the agenda.
In support of that view, it was explained that the proposed change would highlight evolution in procurement practices since 1994, in particular that the procuring entity was expected to obtain the best and not necessarily the cheapest solution.
In support of that view, it was stated that the draft article merely provided an industry-specific version of article 13 of the Model Law and might create uncertainty as to the possible interplay of the two provisions.
In support of that view, it was stated that there might be difficulties with ascertaining what constituted a procedure functionally equivalent to the return of the instrument in the case of the issuance of the undertaking in non-paper form.