Примеры использования The chamber found на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Chamber found that.
As noted above,following almost one year of investigation, the Chamber found that there was no basis for contempt proceedings against staff members of the Office.
The Chamber found that a number of aggravating factors had been established.
On 13 December 2006,after hearing a total of 39 witnesses over 67 trial days, the Chamber found Athanase Seromba, a Roman Catholic priest, guilty of genocide and extermination as a crime against humanity.
The Chamber found that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain charges of genocide.
On 2 November 2012, the Chamber found that Laurent Gbagbo was fit to take part in the proceedings before the Court.
The Chamber found that the late-disclosed evidence did not give rise to a reasonable probability of a different result.
Thus, in June 2010, the Chamber found it necessary to start imposing time limits upon Karadžić for his cross-examination of each witness.
The Chamber found that placing the asylum seekers at the detention centre is justified if risk of absconding has been detected.
Without prejudice to these achievements, the Chamber found that multiple challenges remained and that Libya continued to face substantial difficulties in exercising its full judicial powers across the entire territory or in areas relevant to the case, being thus"unavailable" within the terms of article 17(3) of the Statute.
The Chamber found that the crimes were the consequence of a coordinated effort supervised by a clear chain of command.
The Chamber found that this unavailability impacted on Libya's ability to carry out the proceedings against Mr. Gaddafi in three material ways.
The Chamber found it necessary to assign amici curiae paid by the Tribunal to one such case in order to secure the rights of the accused.
The Chamber found that the accused might not have a fair trial and could be subject, if convicted, to imprisonment with isolation.
The Chamber found violations of articles 2, 3 and 5 of the European Convention in respect of Colonel Palic, and of articles 3 and 8 of the Convention in respect of his wife.
The Chamber found that it is for the State challenging the admissibility of the case to demonstrate that the case is inadmissible before the Court.
The Chamber found reasonable grounds to believe that he had committed five counts of crimes against humanity and two counts of war crimes in Darfur.
However, the Chamber found that Libya had been granted several opportunities to submit evidence in support of its admissibility challenge, filed on 1 May 2012.
The Chamber found that on the basis of that principle it had to seek to determine, in this case, the boundary that was inherited from the French administration.
The Chamber found that the evidence did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he ever instigated or positively assisted the attackers.
The Chamber found that the case against Mr. Gaddafi was admissible before the Court and reminded Libya of its obligation to surrender the suspect to the Court.
The Chamber found that the applicable sentence to the crimes alleged against Munyakazi, life imprisonment in isolation, precluded the referral of his case.
The Chamber found the central issue in the appeal to be the question of whether the events to which the indictments related formed part of the same transaction.
The Chamber found that it had jurisdiction to entertain the request submitted to it by the Council of the International Seabed Authority and decided to respond to that request, as follows.
The Chamber found that the new versions of those documents produced by El Salvador did not overturn the conclusions arrived at by the Chamber in 1992; on the contrary, they bore them out.
The Chamber found there are reasonable grounds to believe Mr. Ntaganda committed the war crimes of enlisting and conscripting children under fifteen and using them to participate actively in hostilities.
The Chamber found that the judicial appointment process in canton 10, where only members or supporters of the ruling Croat nationalist party have been appointed, prevented minorities from filing claims with the courts.
The Chamber found that Libya had properly substantiated its assertion that the domestic authorities are seeking to clarify, through the concrete and progressive steps outlined above, the following relevant factual aspects.
In making this finding, the Chamber found further corroboration in the testimony of Prosecution Witness GBH, who stated that he pleaded with the Accused to stop the killings but the Accused refused, saying that“it was necessary to continue, look for those or hunt for those who had survived”299.